The Detroit plane incident

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

pstamler

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
1,509
Location
St. Louis, MO, USA
Hi folks:

I'm the chair of the Hospitality Committee at my synagogue, and I just got done making up the schedule for who's going to bring after-service snacks for the next six months.

So I sent out the schedule, then read my e-mail -- and discovered that the son of one of the people on my crew was on the plane from Amsterdam to Detroit where the terrorist bombing was thwarted. He's written a remarkably compassionate and humane account of the events at:

http://tinyurl.com/yj5v9mj

It's a pretty amazing story.

Peace,
Paul
 
Statistically flying is still very safe.

With the number of people being killed every week by terrorists, and from the pursuit of terrorists around the world, we should be grateful for our good fortune in dodging this bullet. It certainly wasn't from diligent preventive effort on our part.

On a related note, Sen Lieberman, just warned about the security situation in Yemen.. We just released a half dozen Gitmo alumni to them, with dozens more of the almost 100 Yemeni's remaining, cued up for release.

For those not paying attention, the Saudi's just lost 75+ soldiers fighting Yemen rebels along their common border.

Yemen is not exactly a new problem area. Every one of the Yemeni's convicted for the USS Cole bombing in 2000 have been released or escaped from prison. It doesn't take much imagination to guess what will come of releasing around one hundred detainees there.

While we can push them off our plate, and close this one chapter, their story isn't finished.

Of course I could be wrong.. we'll find out...

JR
 
How far away are we from having devices / sniffer dogs etc.in general use (I believe they have a type of scanner that finds them, but they're in short supply - apparently) that can detect this type of explosive? Another liquid ban means misery for flyers.

When I was in the US last year (SEA) the customs guy told me I couldn't leave the airport with my toothpaste, yet it'd been through several scanners en-route. Why on earth was that?

Justin
 
It won't really matter if we let terrorists lawyer-up and scat-sing all over our judiciary system.
They will watch us fighting the last battle by having passengers sit in straight-jackets through the flight and installing halal bidets in federal prisons, and work on bigger and better ways to kill innocents.
Just like Clinton and Carter, but there's just more than three years left of this political hack and his hackees.
Mike
PS: read the story tonight. . .
 
JohnRoberts said:
It doesn't take much imagination to guess what will come of releasing around one hundred detainees there.

100 Gitmo detainees who, if they weren't 'Death to America', USA hating terrorists when they were captured, will certainly be now!
 
Mike, those bastards eat better than you do.  You only WISH you had halal goat served to you by our country's finest.
Your comment is not worthy of those soldiers spitting dip on your lawn (or apartment door).
Happy New Year!
Mike
 
I don't remember disrespecting any servicemen, you have me confused with somebody else.

I'm just making the point that locking people up for years in legal limbo and (allegedly) torturing them is a good way to breed future terrorists, to give them propaganda recruiting points against us, and doesn't really benefit us in any way. Confessions or evidence extracted via tortured is worse than useless. I could probably get a terrorist to confess to the assasination of JFK if I waterboarded them long enough.

(I have to clarify that when I refer to terrorists in this post I mean people like the guy who tried to blow up an airliner a few days ago, not insurgents in Iraq and Afganistan)

Nobody wants a true terrorist to walk free if they have attempted to murder hundreds of people. But if we can't provide evidence that stands up in a court of law, what are we achieving? If you were accused of attempted murder, you would sure as hell want to have the chance to prove yourself innocent. Thats what due process is for.

We don't do it because we believe the guy didn't do it.

We allow the legal system to do what it has to because we know from past history that one time in umpteen an innocent man gets jailed or put to death for it. Case in point: today a British citizen was put to death in China for carrying drugs into the country (China). People who knew him say he was suffering from mental illness, and was duped into carrying a bag that wasn't his. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8433704.stm

If a US citizen was put to death in China for alleged terrorism charges, I bet you would be the first to say he hadn't had the full legal process he was entitled to. These things work both ways.

I also feel that elevating terrorists to some superhuman boogieman status is just giving them what they want. They want fear. They want disruption. Why hand it to them? Surely these people are just unhinged wannabe criminals, and rather inept ones at that. The guy had explosive underwear and bought a one-way ticket with cash and had no baggage. How was he not picked up as suspicious? I'm more worried about how the screening process failed here than whether the legal system is 'too good for him'.

Happy new year to you too. May it be free of fear.

-Mike C


 
Mike, you have no understanding of these people, and that is EXACTLY what they are exploiting.  You will be butchered while you are bending over backwards to kiss you butt for these anti-humans.  Carter and Clinton made the same mistakes to our detriment.
A court of law for these fiends?  A total joke as it has been and will be proven yet again thanks to B-HO and his homie E-Hold.
Disregarding the farce that the trials will be, how many more terrorist-licking lawyers a la the dis-barred Lynn Stewart are waiting to aid and abet these scoundrels?
You will die reading these guys Miranda or escorting them to appeals hearings.  Wake up and smell the BO.
Mike
 
I don't doubt that some very small percentage of detainees were not hardened combatants. The circumstances surrounding how many of these were captured, is such that rival war lords may have fingered their competition for selfish purposes. Some were just outsiders (like the Chinese Ubzeks) they wanted to get rid of, but let's not forget that many of these lesser threats have already been released by the "evil" former administration. The presumption of innocence doesn't extend to folks engaged in warfare on the battlefield.

Another interesting data point, some are drawing a connection between this recent terrorist attack and some former GITMO alumni (in Yemen). Also, while unsuccessful in crashing the plane, I don't accept the administration's spin that A) this was an isolated individual, B) the system worked,  or C) it was Bush's fault. Napolitano, has since, eaten her words, and Obama's silence has been followed by progressively harder statements. Who knows where he will end up on this, but he has a lot of political capital invested in closing Gitmo. I just worry, at what cost to us and world? They have had almost a year to improve upon the homeland security system they inherited and evidence suggests they have moved the needle the other way. 

Yes, Bush released the two Yemeni implicated with this attack from GITMO, but they were released to the Saudis for an experimental rehabilitation program. It was the former administration's judgement that you can't just release these guys, while the "war" is still going on, and expect them to not return to the fight. The Saudi rehabilitation program was one possible way to close GITMO without paying a price in future repeat attacks.

The Saudi program apparently didn't work, and as I mentioned they are already engaged with the Yemen rebels (?) in open warfare along their border region. I would rather release the 100 odd Yemenis to the Saudis (if they'll take them) since I expect them to handle them with the proper treatment they deserve. Releasing them to Yemen is a bad joke. We'll hear from those folks again. 

People can argue with the political correctness of calling this a war, but we have enemies at war with us (the west). If we ignore that reality, it makes their efforts that much more effective. This is just common sense, which appears to be lacking in our current administration and some fraction of our population. I consider it wishful thinking that we can just talk nice with Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, etc and magically resolve these issues. The new excuse for appeasing Iran is to prevent civil war. Come on, that regime needs a good douche. I am not a proponent of us unilaterally practicing regime change, but we should be more openly supportive to the students there. Obama's most recent statement was better than his previous strong support for the regime, but IMO we should do more.

We are strong, and our system will survive this recent mismanagement, as it has other episodes of weak or misguided leadership. The public is watching this play out in slow motion and drawing their own conclusions.. At some point this administration needs to acknowledge their approach isn't working and adjust, or not.. If they don't adjust, we will adjust them out of office in 2010/2012.

JR
 
Weren't most gitmos simply scooped up from Afghanistan? I mean, to me there's an enormous difference between joining the taliban there and plotting to blow a plane up here. The latter are a threat to our security, I don't know about the former. Anyway, I think everyone deserves a trial, of course this is troublesome when you don't have any evidence but rather simly buy them by the truckload. Wanting them tortured to death (or what you meant by the saudis knowing how to deal with them) sounds rather sick to me.
 
Svart said:
Another take on the situation:

http://www.socialsecurityinstitute.com/blog_post/show/413

Come on, we all have better things to do that debunk anti war conspiracy theorys, but letting my fingers do the walking -

Demuren said the bombing suspect possessed a Nigerian Machine Readable Passport (MRP) issued on September 15, 2005 to expire on September 14, 2010 and the passport number is A3921640.

According to the information from the passport, Abdul-mutallab has multiple entry US Visa issued in London, UK on June 16, 2008 to expire June 12, 2010.

The NCAA Director-General (Dr Harold Demuren) said the suspect presented himself for immigration clearance with his Nigerian passport and the passport was scanned into Passenger Registration System, "confirming that passenger went through normal standard security screening procedure."

"Thereafter, he passed through aviation security system comprising of walk through metal detector and the baggage X-ray screening machine. Passenger proceeded to the boarding gate where he went through secondary screening as confirmed by KLM airline security officials. 

I think Sen a Lieberman is one of the more honorable and credible senators from that select group.  To suggest this is some manufactured event to generate public support for "more" military activity in the region is insane. Did he also conspire to hijack some more ships off Sudan? 

The bomber has recently reported interest in studying Sharia law... This seems to be a more common thread for bad behavior than socio-economic status. I don't understand the attraction myself, but there's is lots I don't understand about lots of people.

Happy new year and don't believe crap you hear on the internet.. Including from me  :'( ...  It's not that hard to find more information.

JR
 
eskimo said:
Weren't most gitmos simply scooped up from Afghanistan? I mean, to me there's an enormous difference between joining the taliban there and plotting to blow a plane up here. The latter are a threat to our security, I don't know about the former. Anyway, I think everyone deserves a trial, of course this is troublesome when you don't have any evidence but rather simly buy them by the truckload. Wanting them tortured to death (or what you meant by the saudis knowing how to deal with them) sounds rather sick to me.
What you think I think is mildly insulting.. but I will live.  For what possible reason would released detainees be tortured, after all these years incarcerated? Just for the sport? Killing them might be more efficient than than waiting for them to attack again, but that is not very sporting  either.

Just to clear up what I meant by my comment, is that the Saudis, being neighbors of yemen, and actively engaged with them in fighting along their border, will not underestimate the threat these people could pose. Likewise, they should be better equipped that westerners to separate the bad asses, from the wannabees, and act accordingly. No, not torture and dismemberment...  Re-education, but not in the North Korean sense of reeducation. Rehabilitation that actually works, not that I know how to do that.. But definitely not wide scale catch and release, like turning them over to yemen would be. Some of these people are still potentially dangerous. If they have all been radicalized by their detention as some here suggest, then they all are dangerous. 

========
I believe some of them may have been collected from Pakistan too, but came from several different countries originally..  The center of Alkeida activity is in the vague border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan. But many different radical groups gravitate to that region for training and education. These days with the Pakistan military cleaning up their north, and more attention from us in Afghanistan, it looks like Yemen is becoming a new destination for wannabees. While the Pakistani's did just detain 5 or 6 US citizens who showed their wannabee ass by trying to hook up with terrorists in Pakistan (without their parents permission).

The individuals harvested by paying a bounty are only a fraction of the people who entered GITMO. The lesser threats have been released already, when possible. A number of countries don't want their people back, or like in the case of China, they won't promise not to mistreat them upon repatriation.

--------------
I have little love for the Saudis. Their years of appeasing the more radical elements among themselves, who have been teaching hate and jihad in Saudi funded madrassas' (religious schools) there and around the world, have created a ticking time bomb fueling this whole mess.

To repeat, the Saudis are who operated the detainee rehabilitation experiment. They also have their own home grown candidates to re-school. The fact that this apparently failed (for at least some), doesn't detract from the reality that they are the world experts on attempting to find humane ways to deal with these combatants, "and' that does not create a future risk threat to all of us.

It is both common practice and common sense to hold combatants (without habeous corpus) until hostilities cease. If anybody thinks this is over, I will respectfully (but not with much respect) disagree. Unilaterally declaring that there is no terror war, does not seem to have been adequate. I hope we don't surrender.  ::)
--------
The UK has made some movements toward establishing Sharia courts, under the mechanism of civil arbitration tribunals. I hope they know what they are doing. I would be nervous about that.

Please think for yourselves, but at least try to get a little better informed. This has been playing out for years. It is remarkable that a failed act here generates such a disproportionate response in the press compared to all the people dying every day by terrorist hands around the world, but for those who still don't quite get it, this was all about taking the fight to them where they are, so they can't take it here.

This is all within their ability to stop in an instant, just stop blowing up innocent civilians in sundry countries.  Maybe that should be their new year's resolution.  8)

JR




 
the problem is that it's also within our power to stop blowing them up too.  Such is the circle of life, we blow them up, they get mad and blow us up.  Then we get mad and blow more shit up and they get madder and blow stuff up, etc.

Everyone thinks they are right and the other person is wrong.

What can we do about that?  That's where the solution lies.
 
John, my apologies, I read in loads into "expect them to handle them with the proper treatment they deserve" thinking you were aiming at their pretty midieval ways of punishment. My bad.
 
eskimo said:
John, my apologies, I read in loads into "expect them to handle them with the proper treatment they deserve" thinking you were aiming at their pretty midieval ways of punishment. My bad.

If you study of behavior of the radicals it is their ideas of justice that are medieval... cutting off hands, stoning people to death, murdering female children or relatives who disgrace the family, killing all infidels just for not believing in the same faith, etc.

It is not uncommon for the western forces to stand down on their high holy days, while they attack on christmas. go figure.

I do have some preconceived notions about how many of these people found their way into detention, but across hundreds of individuals I suspect there is plenty of variation.

JR


 
Svart said:
the problem is that it's also within our power to stop blowing them up too.  Such is the circle of life, we blow them up, they get mad and blow us up.  Then we get mad and blow more shit up and they get madder and blow stuff up, etc.

Everyone thinks they are right and the other person is wrong.

What can we do about that?  That's where the solution lies.

IMO it is not remotely that simple, but you are not alone in that and sundry other equally questionable rationalizations or theories.

I doubt my repeating what seems so obvious to me, will make much difference. So I won't waste your time and mine.

I have been following this closely for several years, and this is anything but simple. 

Have a happy new year. 

JR


 
I was actually trying to spur on some more discussion actually John, devils advocate, if you will.

Nothing is ever simple, on the outside.  From the inside, it's as simple as just not doing something.  Think of it in simpler terms, a schoolyard fight maybe.  Two people don't like each other, usually because of something "said to someone else" about one of the people.  Usually it turns out to be stupid embellishment through hearsay from person to person to person. 

The underlying problems, envy and frustration can't really be solved by anyone other than the person who feels these things, which is why talking and working things out is important.  You just can't get to that point when tit for tat attacks keep happening.  Look at Palestine and Israel..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top