recnsci
Well-known member
Hi all
my two cents:
Input 5532 pair form what Walt Jung calls balanced line receiver using
push-pull feedback. Advantage over simplest design (like GSSL input) is
balanced input impedance. Dissadvantage is high CMRR dependance on
passive component matching (like with GSSL too).
What I find as interesting part is C42 R61 combo. It reminds me of
circuit seen here:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/3171
Basically, this provides AC coupling with small (read super nice poly)
caps=> no electros in signal path. This variation seems to be adaptation
of that topology to balanced reciever. So lower 5532 opamp provides
both balanced Zin and small poly AC coupling for both inputs.
First 052 seem to servo only DC offset "provided" by upper half of 5532
(that is DC caused by Vos and Ios). DC ofset caused by lower 5532 will run wild and free.
Second block is variable gain differential amp. Second 052 will servo out
any DC caused by lower 5532 in input stage and DC caused by 5534.
Using diff amp (built around 5534) for second stage will increase CMRR
(it's like dual stage CM rejection), thus reducing need for fancy ultra
matched resistor pairs in input stage.
Using linear law VR2 not only provides advantages chrissugar mentioned
but gives better resolution around 0dB gain which some (like me) may
prefer(like with cut/boost controll in a.p.i 560 graphic EQ).
VR3 should be CMRR trim. Question is why this configuration .
I have probably made mistakes in analysis so append every
sentence with IMO (and corection is most wellcome)
chiirz
urosh
my two cents:
Input 5532 pair form what Walt Jung calls balanced line receiver using
push-pull feedback. Advantage over simplest design (like GSSL input) is
balanced input impedance. Dissadvantage is high CMRR dependance on
passive component matching (like with GSSL too).
What I find as interesting part is C42 R61 combo. It reminds me of
circuit seen here:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/3171
Basically, this provides AC coupling with small (read super nice poly)
caps=> no electros in signal path. This variation seems to be adaptation
of that topology to balanced reciever. So lower 5532 opamp provides
both balanced Zin and small poly AC coupling for both inputs.
First 052 seem to servo only DC offset "provided" by upper half of 5532
(that is DC caused by Vos and Ios). DC ofset caused by lower 5532 will run wild and free.
Second block is variable gain differential amp. Second 052 will servo out
any DC caused by lower 5532 in input stage and DC caused by 5534.
Using diff amp (built around 5534) for second stage will increase CMRR
(it's like dual stage CM rejection), thus reducing need for fancy ultra
matched resistor pairs in input stage.
Using linear law VR2 not only provides advantages chrissugar mentioned
but gives better resolution around 0dB gain which some (like me) may
prefer(like with cut/boost controll in a.p.i 560 graphic EQ).
VR3 should be CMRR trim. Question is why this configuration .
I have probably made mistakes in analysis so append every
sentence with IMO (and corection is most wellcome)
chiirz
urosh