translating speech in ear system??

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

3nity

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
3,637
Location
MTL, CANADA
Anyone with a clue for this? i need at least 2 x 4 channels one is for french and the other is for english.

anyone has a clue??
 
Curse you Brad... you beat me to it! :evil:

Babel_Fish_diagram.jpg


:twisted:

Keef
 
[quote author="SSLtech"]Curse you Brad... you beat me to it! :evil:
:twisted:
Keef[/quote]

But you found the better graphic!

I do love that series, however low-budg and lame the special effects.

3nity, maybe you could be a bit more specific. You make it sound as if you DO want a Babel Fish, as I understand your post to describe something that is an artificial intelligence wet dream, given current day state-of-the-art.
 
Okay....i need a wireless in ear monitoring for translating purposes.
something putting out 2 different channels and each channel with at least 4 ear monitors!
got it? :roll:
 
Guys, he's not talking about the device itself doing the translating. It looks like he's talking about a multi-out monitor, basically, that a translator would be using so others could hear him/her. Am I close?
 
Its so hard to understand? or what?
I'm looking for a listening equipement! something like in ear monitoring but merely for translating purposes.

But i think i just shouldn't posted here! :thumb:
 
A universal translator would be pretty damn cool, though.

If the speech of any language can be decomposed into a series of functions, it might be possible to translate the inputs of functions from one language to the output functions of another. That's a pretty big if, though.

fsubn(x) => gsubn(x)

Sorry, I've been spending too much time in math class.
 
3nity,

Try http://www.listentech.com/products/nav_portablefm.php

They have a few systems on that page.

I use it in my church with great success.

Also Telex/Bosch has some that are very good, but more expensive.
 
[quote author="Consul"]A universal translator would be pretty damn cool, though.

If the speech of any language can be decomposed into a series of functions, it might be possible to translate the inputs of functions from one language to the output functions of another. That's a pretty big if, though.

fsubn(x) => gsubn(x)

Sorry, I've been spending too much time in math class.[/quote]

That would be one Smooth Operator :grin:

SMOOTH OPERATOR*


"(Cha cha cha cha...)

You're a smooth operator (uh huh)
You're a cool sweet potato (oh, yeah)

Kiss me, baby
Don't make me wait
Hug me, honey
Don't you hesitate

Take my heart and
Don't give it back
(Cha cha cha cha...)
I like it like that

You're a smooth operator (uh huh)
You're a gone alligator (oh, yeah)

Ooh, tell me, baby
Whatcha gonna do
You got me sighing
Wishing for you

But I'm here to tell you
One natural fact
(Cha cha cha cha...)
I like it like that

You've got me yearning
Burning with desire
You set my heart
And soul on fire

You drive me wild
You make me shout
Have mercy, Mr. Percy
Now cut that out

You're a smooth operator (uh huh)
Woo, you're the end of
Butter greater (oh, yeah)

When you kiss me, baby
My toenails curl
And I'm so glad
Just to be your girl

I'd be happy
In a one room shack
(Cha cha cha cha...)
Mmm, I like it like that
I like it like that

(Cha cha cha cha...)

I like it, I like it
I like it..."


(apologies to Bob Elliot & Ray Goulding and their "song-sayer" character, Natalie Attired, and her accompanist Eddie on snare drum [: yeah!])

* after Sarah Vaughan's version

EDIT: CJ, you don't have to say it. I know. And I'm OK with it :razz:
 
Have you been drinking, Brad? :razz:

And here I was, thinking I was off my rocker for suggesting language can be decomposed into sets of functions. :green:

Though I have been listening to old Bruce Haack and Michael Iceberg recordings. Maybe I am going crazy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top