Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2011, 01:41:45 AM »
My drivers finally arrived... so tomorrow I am going to work on mine! They will be a nice dark cherry red... and seriously considering calling them DaveTones :-)
Where did you order your drivers from?


Rob Flinn

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #41 on: October 29, 2011, 12:24:16 PM »
Here's a pic of my Auraclones that I just finished.
regards Rob

DaveP

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2011, 06:07:13 PM »
Hi Rob,

They look the part, do you like how they sound?

best
DaveP
Soundcloud: Delayed Action.

Rob Flinn

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2011, 07:35:51 PM »
Dave to be honest, I literally had just screwed the drivers in when I took the pic & I haven't put anything through them yet.  Hopefully will find some time tomorow.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2016, 03:09:20 PM by Rob Flinn »
regards Rob

buildafriend

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #44 on: October 29, 2011, 08:31:15 PM »
Man! If I would have seen this two weeks ago I could have saved myself 100 bucks. I heard the Auratone 5C original drivers were basically the same as the Bose 901 consumer speakers (except they use one driver, not a billion).

erikb1971

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #45 on: October 30, 2011, 07:21:46 AM »
My drivers finally arrived... so tomorrow I am going to work on mine! They will be a nice dark cherry red... and seriously considering calling them DaveTones :-)
Where did you order your drivers from?

I used the drivers selected by Dave: http://www.maplin.co.uk/Media/PDFs/L69AW.pdf
But since they do not ship to Europe, I had a problem. Fortunately I have a friend who's boyfriend lives in Edinburgh, and as it turned out, he frequently visits what she calls "the boring shop", which is Maplin. So with a little detour.. I got them!
We are getting way past relatively easy

erikb1971

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #46 on: October 31, 2011, 11:54:39 PM »
Here's to Dave!

If Dave is ok with it, I'll put the .ai and .eps files in the gmail account...

Cheers
We are getting way past relatively easy

DaveP

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #47 on: November 01, 2011, 05:16:37 AM »
Stunned but no problem

best
DaveP
Soundcloud: Delayed Action.

erikb1971

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #48 on: November 01, 2011, 05:19:11 AM »
stunned in a good or a bad way?
We are getting way past relatively easy

DaveP

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #49 on: November 01, 2011, 06:02:01 AM »
In an unexpected way, a good surprise

thanks
DaveP
Soundcloud: Delayed Action.


erikb1971

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #50 on: February 02, 2012, 04:04:19 PM »
Finally got my davetones working in the right chain:

RME digiface - Marian Adcon - Mackie BIG Knob - Sure Electronics TA2024 2 * 15watt board - Davetones!

The last three items of that chain on the pic:


Got all of it from ebay: big knob 100 EURO, ampboard 12 EURO (http://www.sureelectronics.net/goods.php?id=1580), davetones DIY 25 EURO

Dirt cheap but surprisingly nice sounding monitoring chain!

Thanks again Dave... here's to you!

Erik
We are getting way past relatively easy

DaveP

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #51 on: February 02, 2012, 05:06:55 PM »
Well done Erik,

The spirit of DIY is alive and kicking!

best

DaveP
Soundcloud: Delayed Action.

Moe

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #52 on: February 07, 2012, 04:15:30 AM »
Maybe this could be a speaker substitude?

http://www.goldwoodsound.com/Woofers4_files/GW2054Sgraphs.pdf

Although the lower mids are a little flatter than the Maplin one!

erikb1971

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #53 on: February 16, 2012, 02:55:44 AM »
Dave, how cool is this: your thread mentioned in the Feb 2012 issue of Sound on Sound, in the article on the Behringer Auratones!

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb12/articles/behringer-c5a-c50a.htm

From the alternatives section:

"Those interested in that (DIY) option should check out this interesting DIY project: http://www.groupdiy.com/index.php?topic=43086.0"

To all those SOS readers: welcome, and build this project, it is fun, easy and very rewarding!

Erik
We are getting way past relatively easy

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #54 on: March 06, 2012, 11:20:20 AM »
Hi there guys!
Excellent works indeed!

I would like to ask you if its just simpler to use a non magnetic shield speaker.
The idea is that LCD are no longer used as monitors.

Also can any of you guys post pics of the inside?

Many thanks!
Costas

Rob Flinn

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #55 on: March 06, 2012, 12:05:54 PM »
Hi there guys!
Excellent works indeed!

I would like to ask you if its just simpler to use a non magnetic shield speaker.
The idea is that LCD are no longer used as monitors.

Also can any of you guys post pics of the inside?

Many thanks!
Costas

I don't think that it is simpler whether you use a shielded or non sheilded driver.  You just buy the drivers, there is no extra work required either way.
regards Rob

gemini86

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #56 on: March 06, 2012, 12:56:27 PM »
And just to clarify, I believe you meant to say crt, not lcd.
- Rodney

"...you better call Kenny Loggins, 'cause you're in the danger zone."

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #57 on: March 11, 2012, 06:56:55 PM »

I don't think that it is simpler whether you use a shielded or non sheilded driver.  You just buy the drivers, there is no extra work required either way.

I thought there would be a greater variety in non-shielded drivers that much the needed response.

And just to clarify, I believe you meant to say crt, not lcd.

Yes right!


Rob Flinn

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #58 on: March 11, 2012, 08:18:01 PM »

I don't think that it is simpler whether you use a shielded or non sheilded driver.  You just buy the drivers, there is no extra work required either way.

I thought there would be a greater variety in non-shielded drivers that much the needed response.

The thing is you don't use Auratones/clones because you want great fidelity, they are used to give you an idea of what it's going to sound like on some very ordinary, not particularly good speakers.  So "much needed frequency response" isn't a too big issue here.
regards Rob

Re: Auratone DIY
« Reply #59 on: March 12, 2012, 09:32:20 AM »
The thing is you don't use Auratones/clones because you want great fidelity, they are used to give you an idea of what it's going to sound like on some very ordinary, not particularly good speakers.  So "much needed frequency response" isn't a too big issue here.

I can understand that as well as getting rid of the crossover area of a 2way monitor!
I saw your Auraclones and they look fantastic! Which drivers did you use?

The original Auratone had a very steep/tight time domain response (~20ms).
Shouldnt that be accounted as well?
Or is it that with most drivers frequency transients across the 100-10000Hz, die out fast?

Cheers
Costas




 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
34 Replies
8793 Views
Last post October 16, 2006, 12:01:24 PM
by kato
6 Replies
6281 Views
Last post August 03, 2007, 03:14:50 PM
by OlympicPhil
5 Replies
2474 Views
Last post September 04, 2007, 09:16:31 PM
by walter
1 Replies
2744 Views
Last post February 16, 2012, 03:23:42 AM
by Kingston