>
I'm in PA ...I don't think our buildings out here would survive a quake either.
Might. Depends.
I'm in Maine and planning a building.
We have 1 and 2 scale quakes every few years, nobody notices. In the last 100 years, earthquakes in Maine have caused one chimney collapse and one rock-fall in the park. The park is all rocks piled up, they sometimes fall for no reason. Old-time chimneys were sometimes dodgy from the start.
So I am not required to consider seismic stresses.
I am of course required to brace for wind. Design-max wind on my neck of land is 5%-10% higher than where you are, no large difference in MOST of the US.
Wind and quake are not the same thing: wind is by outside area and seismic is by the load inside. But it turns out, for reasonable residential and light commercial buildings, the wind stresses are not very different from seismic stresses in many-many areas of Calif. In fact I am desiging for wind force which works out like 0.2-0.4 times design roof-floor load, in many seismic zones I would design for 0.2 quake-factor. So the big sticks/panels that take wind will also take quake.
If I were designing heavy-storage loft or an empty atrium, the design forces would not be near-equal wind/quake. In a high-seismic zone (silt-mud near fault) quake would dominate. In Florida, wind dominates by far.
But mostly, _IF_ the structure is good for wind (many are dubious), it will take the kind of quakes that happen in "small/rare quake" zones.
FWIW: while my building could shake-down or blow-away, what REALLY kills buildings around here seems to be tired trucks. Couple times a year a
truck plows into a house. While obviously rare, this is far more often than the reported shake/blow failures.