How does this shielding work? (magnetic tape head)

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

wtmnmf

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
380
Location
Berkeley,CA USA
This page http://www.manquen.net/audio/docs/Ampex%20ATR-100%20Reproduce%20Head%20Construction.htm has a deconstructed Ampex repro head.  The shielding between the windings is made of a sandwich of copper and mu-metal.  How does having nine thin laminations of mu-metal improve the shielding over one thick layer?  Why two metals?  The laminations are not obviously coated in a way that would provide for some spatial separation, which I can intuit would have an effect.  Also, the mu-metal laminations do not vary in thickness, so I don't think that an analog to acoustic loss through changing materials applies here.

Anyone have a clue?

 

Attachments

  • image020.jpg
    image020.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 47
i believe that the copper is for the electrostatic shielding, that is, the E field, or the Electric Field, the mu metal is then for the magnetic fields,

laminating the mu metal is better for shielding,

exact mechanism for this is beyond my knowledge, i would suspect that the molecules in one chunk of mu metal would induce their effects on the transformer more than many layers, the  gap formed by the non ferrous  copper in between the mu metal also helps to keep the bad fields from the good fields, kind of like adding leakage inductance to a transformer,

ok, here is some stuff of the wiki leaks website,  ;D

"The high permeability of mu-metal provides a low reluctance path for magnetic flux, leading to its major use, in magnetic shields against static or slowly varying magnetic fields. Magnetic shielding made with high permeability alloys like mu-metal works not by blocking magnetic fields but by providing a path for the magnetic field lines around the shielded area. So the best shape for shields is a closed container surrounding the shielded space. The effectiveness of mu-metal shielding decreases with the alloy's permeability, which drops off at both low field strengths and, due to saturation, at high field strengths. So mu-metal shields are often made of several enclosures one inside the other, each of which successively reduces the field inside it. RF magnetic fields above about 100 kHz can be shielded by Faraday shields, ordinary conductive metal sheets or screens which are used to shield against electric fields..."

ok, so the copper is for high freq mag fields because the mu metal cuts out at a fairly low frequency,
and maybe electrical fields at the same time,

the explanation of laminated could be better, i imagine it increases the freq response of the normally sluggish mu metal, one solid chunk of mu would probably have a very low freq response due to eddy currents, so laminating is just like transformer laminations, less lossy especially at higher freqs.

Ferromagnetism by Bozorth is the source for this stuff >

"Described as THE classic text on magnetism, FERROMAGNETISM covers the basics of magnetics, as well as in-depth coverage of magnetic materials. IEEE Press has now brought this important cornerstone of magnetics research back into print. Recognized for its breadth of coverage, this book includes information on magnetic phenomenon and theories, magnetic materials, basic magnetization and domain theory, as well as many fundamental expressions, and useful technical data on many materials."

more>

"What is the difference between RF and Magnetic shielding?

Radio frequency (or RF) shielding is required when it is necessary to block high frequency - 100 kilohertz and above - interference fields. These shields typically use copper, aluminum, galvanized steel, or conductive rubber, plastic or paints. These materials work at high frequencies by means of their high conductivity, and little or no magnetic permeability. Magnetic shields use their high permeability to attract magnetic fields and divert the magnetic energy through themselves. With proper construction, magnetic shielding alloys have the ability to function as broadband shields, shielding both rf and magnetic interference fields.

What is the difference between DC and AC fields?

DC fields are non-varying, or perhaps slowly changing. A DC field might be from the Earth, a permanent magnet, or a coil carrying direct current. AC magnetic fields oscillate in direction at a frequency. The most common AC magnetic fields are 60 Hertz fields emitted by electric power equipment. These are typically referred to as EMI or electro-magnetic interference.

What are the frequency ranges of electromagnetic interference?

EMI (electro magnetic interference) can be roughly classified by the frequency of the interfering signal. Although some users may consider differing break points, approximate ranges are:

Microwave (MW) 300 MHz - 300 Ghz
Radiofrequency (RF) 300 Hz - 300 MHz
Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) 30 Hz - 300 Hz

The ELF range includes the 60 Hertz power line frequency commonly used in the United States and many countries. In other countries and regions, the power line frequency is 50 Hertz.

The radio frequency range is quite broad, and includes some lower frequencies that can be effectively shielded by magnetic shielding alloys and constructions. At the highest frequencies, shield techniques include much greater need for tight seams and space-filling conductive gaskets at joints.

drink Ovaltine for rocket power.  :p
 
wtmnmf said:
How does having nine thin laminations of mu-metal improve the shielding over one thick layer?
The surface of the lams is not perfectly plane, there are many microscopic asperities that provide another transition boundary.
Why two metals?
Because every time a flux meets a boundary with different permittivity, it creates a deflection of the flux. You know, like the fishbowl effect, that makes things appear closer, but also makes things disappear if they are at a significant angle.
Also, the mu-metal laminations do not vary in thickness, so I don't think that an analog to acoustic loss through changing materials applies here.
yes it does, because the major factor is the varying permittivity - in fact copper is like air in this regard (but much better at keeping the mumetal lams separated).
 
at first blush, i'm surprised that the lamination process would not impart significant deformities into the layers of mu metal shielding- thus disturbing the grain orientation and decreasing its effectiveness.  am i out of bounds here?
 
grantlack said:
at first blush, i'm surprised that the lamination process would not impart significant deformities into the layers of mu metal shielding- thus disturbing the grain orientation and decreasing its effectiveness.  am i out of bounds here?
Magnetic grain orientation is always done during the lamination process, followed by cutting then thermal treatment. The resulting laminations must be assembled without mechanical stress.
 
These links may be useful
Main Site https://www.advancemag.com
How to use the engineering kit (thin sheets)https://www.advancemag.com/howtouse.htm
Shield Design (some math )https://www.advancemag.com/ShieldDesign.htm

While the site is a bit hard to navigate, they have quite a bit of information on magnetic shielding, and on the use of layers. I quote a fragment of their "How to use" which is in reference to the "Engineering kit" they sell below which has some information on layering, and the notion of using different permeability materials in a sequence.

One other advantage to thin layers is that deformation of mu-metal makes it less effective (and so it is usually heat treat after forming) but the actual deformation of the material around a given radius is far less in forming a foil than in forming a thicker piece.


Thickness and number of layers can be determined by ordinary trial and error procedure, or a formula to follow may be requested from the manufacturer. Begin by using a single layer and then adding layers until the desired shielding effect is achieved. When using multiple layers in steady fields and at low frequencies, the low permeability layer should be closest to the field source. This tends to increase the flux density shielding capabilities. The low permeability layer diverts the major portion of the field, permitting the high permeability layer or layers to operate in a lower reluctance mode.
 
bruce0 said:
Thickness and number of layers can be determined by ordinary trial and error procedure, or a formula to follow may be requested from the manufacturer. Begin by using a single layer and then adding layers until the desired shielding effect is achieved. When using multiple layers in steady fields and at low frequencies, the low permeability layer should be closest to the field source. This tends to increase the flux density shielding capabilities. The low permeability layer diverts the major portion of the field, permitting the high permeability layer or layers to operate in a lower reluctance mode.
That's because, in the case of a high induction source, such as a transformer, or motor, the closest material may be saturated (the lower permeability material has a higher saturation induction). In that case, it is not uncommon to use silicon steel as the closest shield.
Not a real concern for magnetic heads.
 
Looks like this is the explaination for the copper layers:
****************
From Richard D. Vance, President Ad-Vance Magnetics:

ELECTROSTATICS

Since ferromagnetic shielding alloys are reasonably conductive, proper grounding of an electromagnetic shield can usually provide an adequete electric-field shield at low frequencies.  Grounding is not necessary to obtain magnetic shielding, but it's good practice.  At increased frequencies, skin effect becomes a dominant factor, and the conductivity of the shield material should be greater than that of permeable alloys.  For good conductivity, materials like aluminum or copper are needed.  One way of combining magnetic and electrostatic capabilities in a single-layer shield is to copperplate the magnetic shield with sufficient copper to satisfy skin-effect requirements.


*******************
I'm still a bit puzzled by the mutilayered Mu-metal part.  I'm guessing that a few things are at work.  First, the material is not available in the desired (overall) thickness as a standard product.  Second, there is an advantage to layering that is said to be complex to calculate, but real.  Third, unlike foil, heavier-gauge material requires heat treatment after fabrication.  So it is not that surprising that it's a multilayer construction.

The strange thing is this; they chose nine layers of .002 inch material which, due to irregularities, stack-up .02 inches high.  That results in shielding which is about nine times better than a single layer, maybe a little more...  But if they had been willing to accept .024 inches, they could have made it a sandwich with two layers of Mu-metal, seperated by a .02 inch insulator, resulting in 40 times the attenuation of a single layer!  And I'm also guessing that the .02 inch insulator could be reduced a little while retaining most of the benefit, maybe even tweeked by tuning the dialectric constant for more efficiency than is standard for the rule of thumb.


I'm encouraged enough to think that it's not entirely crazy to think about building some heads though  :)

I think that some modern tecniques might even make a better head.  For instance, laser cutting the gap after assembly.
 
This table shows the perm of different thicknesses of mu metal,

as you can see, the thin stuff does better, especially at higher gauss levels.

when mu metal is exposed to an external magnetic field, the molecules are aligned in such a way as to cancel the magnetic field. it takes energy to keep a magnetic field going, so the lams are absorbing energy. a solid piece of mu metal would not generate as much magnetic cancellation as many thin layers, and thus, not absorb as much magnetic energy, which means this energy reaches into the sensitive recording head.

so the higher the perm, the easier the molecules are aligned by the external field, and thus, more energy is absorbed.

u means perm, thus the name mu metal,

AC MAGNETIC PROPERTIES, 60 Hz
Minimum Limits
Thickness
in.          mm µ 40 G µ 200 G µ 2000 G
0.0251 0.635 35,000 40,000 55,000
0.0141 0.356 55,000 65,000 95,000
0.0061 0.152 65,000 85,000 135,000
0.0022 0.051 70,000 90,000 220,000

here is some more weird stuff,

"Why is CO-NETIC AA alloy offered in both Perfection Annealed and Stress Annealed types?

CO-NETIC AA alloy always requires a special annealing process to develop its full magnetic properties. If fabrication involves severe drawing, forming or welding operations, the properties of the alloy will be adversely affected, and annealing must be done after the manufacturing operations are complete. For such applications, CO-NETIC AA alloy Stress Annealed is offered. It has better formability characteristics and costs less.

If the application does not involve severe drawing, forming or welding, then CO-NETIC AA alloy Perfection Annealed may be used, and the final annealing step may be avoided. This is because CO-NETIC AA alloy Perfection Annealed has been fully annealed before shipment and is ready to perform as a magnetic shield. CO-NETIC AA alloy Perfection Annealed has a large, open grain structure and must not be used when the shield fabrication involves severe drawing, forming or welding. CO-NETIC AA alloy Perfection Annealed is an economical choice for flat shields and some formed shields. Please contact us for help in determining which material is best for your specific application. All CO-NETIC AA alloy foil is Perfection Annealed.

Does cutting the alloy destroy its properties?

This concern about the magnetic shielding alloys arises because they do have a sensitivity to mechanical shock - bending, forming, even severe flexing may give some reduction in the alloy's magnetic permeability. Modern, vacuum-refined alloys have a lower sensitivity to shock, and normally withstand regular handling without significant loss of properties. Cutting by shearing, EDM, waterjet, photo-chemical etching, or blanking dies typically only affects that portion of the alloy immediately adjacent to the edge, and the shield will exhibit normal shielding performance. If the alloy had already received its final magnetic anneal, re-annealing should not be necessary.

Why must MuMetal® alloy be final annealed to develop magnetic shielding performance?

To obtain optimum magnetic properties, annealing MuMetal® alloy following fabrication is essential. This should be done in a furnace that allows for careful control of the annealing temperature and cooling rate. Optimum properties are reached in a pure hydrogen atmosphere.

What effect does heating the magnetic material have on its magnetic shielding properties?

CO-NETIC and NETIC magnetic shielding alloys have a positive coefficient of permeability with respect to temperature. This is a quick way of saying that the permeability increases as temperature increases. This occurs until operating temperature nears the Curie temperature, defined as the temperature where permeability goes to 1 and the alloy becomes magnetically transparent. The Curie temperatures are between 850°F (454°C) and 840°F (449°C) for CO-NETIC, NETIC and MuMetal. At operating temperatures above the Curie temperature, the shield will not provide any attenuation of the magnetic field. Rolloff of permeability begins as operating temperature nears (within 25°F) the Curie temperature listed, so a safety factor for allowable operating temperature should be used.

Note: Temporary temperature excursions above curie temperature do not degrade the alloys. Shielding function is restored when the temperature again falls below Curie point.

What effect does cryogenically cooling the magnetic material have on its magnetic shielding properties?

CONETIC AA alloy is affected by operation at low temperatures. The saturation induction (which determines maximum field) remains unaffected, but the permeability decreases as the temperature drops, because of reduced molecular mobility. "

so the bottom line on all this, is molecular mobility.

the thinner the lam, the more mobility, because the molecules on the edge of the lam can spin easier since they are not crashing into an adjacent molecule. so the more flat sides you have for a given thickness of steel, the easier it is for the molecules to move.

i would venture to guess that the molecules on the outside of the lam are spinning more than the inner molecules, somewhat of a skin effect for lams.

think of a big crowd of people bunched together, if you asked them to turn left, then right, the people on the outside of the crowd would have an easier time turning than the poor slobs stuck in the middle. same thing for molecules trapped inside an alloy.

this ties in with hysteresis and eddy currents, permeability, frequency response,

but remember, the easier the molecule move for a given field, the easier the metal saturates.

but external mag fields are hopefully not so strong that they saturate your shield.
 
From the 1948 Masters Thesis of S.A. Sherwin:

"A laminated structure is necessary to hold eddy currents to a minimum at the high frequencies involved, particularly in erasing and biasing."

He is talking about Mu-metal in the construction of the pole pieces, so it's not exactly the same problem.  I'm not sure in what way eddy currents would have a detrimental effect on shielding.

Never the less, this may be the issue that forces the use of many layers vs two layers separated by a relatively large insulator.  I'll have to see if I can find some data or equations relevant to this question.
 
less eddy currents means that the mu metal will shield higher frequency mag fields,

Ferromagnetism

Bozorth

anybody have a usenet account?  :p

some more goop to wade through, heavier this time,

"There are a number of crystalline materials that exhibit ferromagnetism (or ferrimagnetism). The table on the right lists a representative selection of them here, along with their Curie temperatures, the temperature above which they cease to exhibit spontaneous magnetization (see below).

Ferromagnetic metal alloys whose constituents are not themselves ferromagnetic in their pure forms are called Heusler alloys, named after Fritz Heusler.

One can also make amorphous (non-crystalline) ferromagnetic metallic alloys by very rapid quenching (cooling) of a liquid alloy. These have the advantage that their properties are nearly isotropic (not aligned along a crystal axis); this results in low coercivity, low hysteresis loss, high permeability, and high electrical resistivity. A typical such material is a transition metal-metalloid alloy, made from about 80% transition metal (usually Fe, Co, or Ni) and a metalloid component (B, C, Si, P, or Al) that lowers the melting point.

A relatively new class of exceptionally strong ferromagnetic materials are the rare-earth magnets. They contain lanthanide elements that are known for their ability to carry large magnetic moments in well-localized f-orbitals.


Physical origin

The property of ferromagnetism is due to the direct influence of two effects from quantum mechanics: spin and the Pauli exclusion principle.

The spin of an electron, combined with its orbital angular momentum, results in a magnetic dipole moment and creates a magnetic field. (The classical analogue of quantum-mechanical spin is a spinning ball of charge, but the quantum version has distinct differences, such as the fact that it has discrete up/down states that are not described by a vector; similarly for "orbital" motion, whose classical analogue is a current loop.) In many materials (specifically, those with a filled electron shell), however, the total dipole moment of all the electrons is zero (i.e., the spins are in up/down pairs). Only atoms with partially filled shells (i.e., unpaired spins) can experience a net magnetic moment in the absence of an external field. A ferromagnetic material has many such electrons, and if they are aligned they create a measurable macroscopic field.

These permanent dipoles (often called simply "spins" even though they also generally include orbital angular momentum) tend to align in parallel to an external magnetic field, an effect called paramagnetism. (A related but much weaker effect is diamagnetism, due to the orbital motion induced by an external field, resulting in a dipole moment opposite to the applied field.) Ferromagnetism involves an additional phenomenon, however: the dipoles tend to align spontaneously, without any applied field. This is a purely quantum-mechanical effect.

According to classical electromagnetism, two nearby magnetic dipoles will tend to align in opposite directions (which would create an antiferromagnetic material). In a ferromagnet, however, they tend to align in the same direction because of the Pauli principle: two electrons with the same spin cannot also have the same "position", which effectively reduces the energy of their electrostatic interaction compared to electrons with opposite spin. (Mathematically, this is expressed more precisely in terms of the spin-statistics theorem: because electrons are fermions with half-integer spin, their wave functions are antisymmetric under interchange of particle positions. This can be seen in, for example, the Hartree-Fock approximation to lead to a reduction in the electrostatic potential energy.) This difference in energy is called the exchange energy.

At long distances (after many thousands of ions), the exchange energy advantage is overtaken by the classical tendency of dipoles to anti-align. This is why, in an equilibriated (non-magnetized) ferromagnetic material, the dipoles in the whole material are not aligned. Rather, they organize into magnetic domains (also known as Weiss domains) that are aligned (magnetized) at short range, but at long range adjacent domains are anti-aligned. The transition between two domains, where the magnetization flips, is called a domain wall (i.e., a Bloch/Néel wall, depending upon whether the magnetization rotates parallel/perpendicular to the domain interface) and is a gradual transition on the atomic scale (covering a distance of about 300 ions for iron).

Thus, an ordinary piece of iron generally has little or no net magnetic moment. However, if it is placed in a strong enough external magnetic field, the domains will re-orient in parallel with that field, and will remain re-oriented when the field is turned off, thus creating a "permanent" magnet. This magnetization as a function of the external field is described by a hysteresis curve. Although this state of aligned domains is not a minimal-energy configuration, it is extremely stable and has been observed to persist for millions of years in seafloor magnetite aligned by the Earth's magnetic field (whose poles can thereby be seen to flip at long intervals). The net magnetization can be destroyed by heating and then cooling (annealing) the material without an external field, however.

As the temperature increases, thermal oscillation, or entropy, competes with the ferromagnetic tendency for dipoles to align. When the temperature rises beyond a certain point, called the Curie temperature, there is a second-order phase transition and the system can no longer maintain a spontaneous magnetization, although it still responds paramagnetically to an external field. Below that temperature, there is a spontaneous symmetry breaking and random domains form (in the absence of an external field). The Curie temperature itself is a critical point, where the magnetic susceptibility is theoretically infinite and, although there is no net magnetization, domain-like spin correlations fluctuate at all lengthscales.

The study of ferromagnetic phase transitions, especially via the simplified Ising spin model, had an important impact on the development of statistical physics. There, it was first clearly shown that mean field theory approaches failed to predict the correct behavior at the critical point (which was found to fall under a universality class that includes many other systems, such as liquid-gas transitions), and had to be replaced by renormalization group theory.
Unusual ferromagnetism

In 2004, it was reported that a certain allotrope of carbon, carbon nanofoam, exhibited ferromagnetism. The effect dissipates after a few hours at room temperature, but lasts longer at low temperatures. The material is also a semiconductor. It is thought that other similarly-formed materials, such as isoelectronic compounds of boron and nitrogen, may also be ferromagnetic. The alloy ZnZr2 is also ferromagnetic below 28.5 K. "



say what? :eek: ???

 
CJ said:
less eddy currents means that the mu metal will shield higher frequency mag fields,

But is it necessary...?

I'm gonna have to get a feel for the physical dimensions and how they relate to frequency dependent effects.

Many references use squirrely terms like 'high frequency' that are context and epoch sensitive.  20 Kcps (Khz for you young 'uns) was considered HF in the early days of magnetic recording.  Then came HF AC bias which was an order of magnitude higher.  Now we are many orders of magnitude higher than that for data recording.

I am enjoying researching this branch of magnetics because it's so well defined in terms of the design goals.  That is as opposed to, for instance, transformer design, which encompasses a much broader application set.  That means that when I search for documentation I tend to find stuff that is well focused on the particulars of magnetic tape recording.

A funny story that I came across about the beginnings of magnetic tape production in the US:
The US captured some used tape from the Nazis, and Roosevelt recorded a speech on some of it which was to be broadcast to the Germans.  Seems they failed to adequately erase the voice of Hitler from the previous recording, which caused some confusion amongst the Germans, who heard Roosevelt's speech interspersed with the voice of Hitler!  That was quite an embarrassment for the US military, who ordered the creation of an American magnetic recording tape manufacturing facility.  In short order, this became Ampex. 
 
CJ said:
less eddy currents means that the mu metal will shield higher frequency mag fields,

Ferromagnetism

Bozorth

anybody have a usenet account?  :p

some more goop to wade through, heavier this time,

{snip goop}

Thanks for the thesis! I've bookmarked it for the time when my son inevitably asks, "Magnets! How the fuck do they work?"

-a
 
here are some numbers for the quantatative types,>

What is field attenuation?

This is also known as the shielding factor (S) and is a ratio of the magnetic field strength outside of the magnetic shield (Ha) and the resultant field on the inside of the shield ie Ha/Hi (no units) or S = 20 x log(Ha/Hi) (Db). There are various formula based on the permeability of the material, the shape and size of the shield and the material thickness. In most cases these formulae are only approximate and are for DC fields only.


For a closed shielding can :

S = 4/3 X (Mu x d/D) where Mu : The permeability(relative)

d : material thickness

D : Shielding Diameter

For a long hollow cylinder in a magnetic transverse field :

S = Mu x d/D

For a cubic shielding box :

S = 4/5 X (Mu x d/a)

a : box side length.

In the case of multiple layer shields with air gaps provided by insulating spacers the shielding factors of the individual shields are multiplied together resulting in excellent shielding factors.

For a double layer shield :

S= S1 x ((S2 x (2 x change in diameter /diameter) )

field being re-routed>
 

Attachments

  • Magnetic-Field-Flow.jpg
    Magnetic-Field-Flow.jpg
    77.1 KB · Views: 8
if ya like thinking about magnetic fields, 

pretty much off topic, except having to do with magnetism.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2011/10/levitating-disc-stays-locked-in-3d-space.html
 
wtmnmf said:
A funny story that I came across about the beginnings of magnetic tape production in the US:
The US captured some used tape from the Nazis, and Roosevelt recorded a speech on some of it which was to be broadcast to the Germans.  Seems they failed to adequately erase the voice of Hitler from the previous recording, which caused some confusion amongst the Germans, who heard Roosevelt's speech interspersed with the voice of Hitler!  That was quite an embarrassment for the US military, who ordered the creation of an American magnetic recording tape manufacturing facility.  In short order, this became Ampex.

I have heard a different version of that story. The Americans and the British are cruising through Germany on their way to Berlin. The Russians are pounding in from the east. Each army scoured through the rubble for technology to send back home before the other guys found it. How do you think we got to the moon? With von Braun and hundreds of V2 rockets shipped back to the US. In the 1930's, the Germans had it going on in terms of technology. They had many things (not exactly sure what all of them are) which were vastly superior to anything we (Americans) had. Including magnetic tape recorders and playback machines. These were kind of consumer items over there at that time. Many well-to-do families had tape players. Well, along came the Americans and an officer (Major Jack Mullin) found one or more of these tape recorders and shipped it back home. Ampex was founded from those machines. I don't know anything about the poorly erased Hitler voice business. Maybe it's true. Maybe it's not. I don't know.

"Near the end of the war, while serving in the U.S. Army Signal Corps, Major Jack Mullin was assigned to investigate German radio and electronics experiments. He discovered the Magnetophons with AC biasing on a trip to Radio Frankfurt which gave much better fidelity than shellac records. Mullin acquired two Magnetophon recorders along with 50 reels of BASF Type L tape and brought them to America where he produced modified versions. He demonstrated them May 16, 1946, to the Institute of Radio Engineers in San Francisco." (Continue reading here = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampex) Jack Mullin founded Ampex.

CJ - Nice treatise as usual. Thanks for your generous sharing. Dana Walcott.
 
Back
Top