dmp
Well-known member
donald fagen
joe cocker
Miles Davis, Bitches Brew
joe cocker
Miles Davis, Bitches Brew
ruckus328 said:and don't forget "Thrust"
Yes, as Greg said,living sounds said:It would be nice not to discuss politics, I guess... 8)
Kingston said:ruckus328 said:and don't forget "Thrust"
haha! yeah that's one of the biggest tabus around here, also the greatest case of double standards on the forum.
ruckus328 said:Kingston said:ruckus328 said:and don't forget "Thrust"
haha! yeah that's one of the biggest tabus around here, also the greatest case of double standards on the forum.
Ha. Well, hopefully not to derail the thread too much, but...... Yes, "thrust" has been a matter of much controversy. Here's the bottom line, most here are probably not even aware, but just to kill this issue:
The patent for the circuitry (US Patent #5,170,437) has expired as of Oct 2010. I have writen confirmation from the US patent office on this matter, and all of my inquiries are on file actually. It actually may have expired as early as 2007, depending on which law it fell under, but the patent office didn't dig that deep into the matter, only to confirm that whether you look at the 17 years from issue or 20 years from file date, either way Oct 2010 was the worst case expiration date.
So no matter what issues might have arisen in the past or how bogus the patent was to begin with they are all moot points now. The name "thust" itself is actively trademarked by API, so use of that name on any sort of design or clone would be illegal, (and don't call it "tilt" either, that's a trademark of tonelux), but use of the circuit itself is fair game.
that's what the ™ is forbuildafriend said:it seems to me like they are trying to copyright terminology.
buildafriend said:Hahaha. Is thrust a technical term? It would make me laugh if they tried to take something like "intensity" under their belt. I mean really.. it seems to me like they are trying to copyright terminology.
Kingston said:buildafriend said:Hahaha. Is thrust a technical term? It would make me laugh if they tried to take something like "intensity" under their belt. I mean really.. it seems to me like they are trying to copyright terminology.
well at least thrust (when in conjunction with sidechains) was their idea in the first place. It's more worrying when common generic terms like "tilt", "monster" or "scrolls" are trademarked. It's not like tilt-shift filters are their original idea, or that scrolls can only mean scrolls in some specific game and not in their original meaning.
I for one wouldn't give a rats ass with trademarks like that. Let them try the old cease and desists bullying. Because that one always works so well. Or gives such favorable publicity.
JohnRoberts said:When did they first come up with that...? I put a tilt control (more like a hi cut or low cut with only a little other band boost) in the side chain of a noise gate back in the late '80s/early 90's, but the product never made it into full production (for Peavey's AMR division) I did show it at trade shows tho. The tilt I did was some one pot wonder based on a bastardized Baxandall tone control, but it worked well to improve sensitivity of noise gate side chain to help it ignore HF or LF leakage.
Enter your email address to join: