In line BNC 10x attenuator

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

bjoneson

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
170
Location
Oakland, IA
Maybe this is a silly question, but here goes...

I'm trying to measure the output of a power amp for clipping level, and am using a dual banana plug adapter to go BNC straight into my Tektronix 434 scope.

The issue is, the max scale is 10V / div. Obviously, could use a 10x probe, but it's a little less convenient.

Do they make such a thing as an in-line 10x attenuator for straight BNC connections?

 
If you want 10X it's actually 9M resistor and you could select a cap to stuff in parallel for best HF response on one particular scope or add the trim circuit which is probably a PIA for you, unless you have a fixed 10X donor probe, to take the BNC from.

I guess this is the more reasonable one for audio use, instead of the trim cap you could select a fixed one for your scope.
jd0xE.jpg


This is a nice one if you get a donor probe, one which has the trim on the BNC, not on the probe.
oscilloscope-probe-schematic-01.gif


This is in case you get serious into HF and you need to start from scratch.
Scope-Schematic-1.jpg


JS
 
joaquins said:
If you want 10X it's actually 9M resistor and you could select a cap to stuff in parallel for best HF response on one particular scope or add the trim circuit which is probably a PIA for you, unless you have a fixed 10X donor probe, to take the BNC from.

I guess this is the more reasonable one for audio use, instead of the trim cap you could select a fixed one for your scope.
jd0xE.jpg


This is a nice one if you get a donor probe, one which has the trim on the BNC, not on the probe.
oscilloscope-probe-schematic-01.gif


This is in case you get serious into HF and you need to start from scratch.
Scope-Schematic-1.jpg


JS
Would it not be more simpler just to get a new scope probe that is x1/x10 switchable?  Does everything for you.

Mike

 
madswitcher said:
Would it not be more simpler just to get a new scope probe that is x1/x10 switchable?  Does everything for you.

Mike

  Usually fixed X10 probes are better than switchable, if you are working up to a few MHz it's fine and practical the switchable ones, of course. Not having the switch means having the 9M resistor physically closer to the tip, so less capacitance loading the DUT and more control over the resulting filter, as usual the 9M needs a cap in parallel, and at some point compensation trimming is needed, but now you can do that at the other end of the probe, and as there isn't a switch anymore the filter can be much more elaborated and precise. Switchable probes are a compromise, and generally speaking using X1 probes is a compromise, for bandwidth and safety, and should only be used when the 10X more gain are required to measure very low level signals (and limited bandwidth).

  In this case bjoneson didn't need a probe but banana plugs, I suggested just to add a resistor inside of one and in the case to need extra bandwidth add the proper compensation, and then the various approaches depending on the expected results, just adding the resistors would seriously compromise even for audio range, ~1M impedance of the 9M-1M devider and just 20pF means -3dB @9kHz, and depending on the wire it's likely to have more than 20pF combined with the scope's input capacitance.

JS
 
joaquins said:
  Usually fixed X10 probes are better than switchable, if you are working up to a few MHz it's fine and practical the switchable ones, of course.

For standard audio work, the switchable probes are just fine. Hell, they're fine with my 200 MHz analog bandwidth TDS2024. For high-frequency work, the 3" ground wire is more of a problem than the switchable attenuation. (The DPO3034 on my desk at work does not have switchable probes.)
 
Andy Peters said:
For standard audio work, the switchable probes are just fine. Hell, they're fine with my 200 MHz analog bandwidth TDS2024. For high-frequency work, the 3" ground wire is more of a problem than the switchable attenuation. (The DPO3034 on my desk at work does not have switchable probes.)

  Is very common to see very cheap switchable, not so much expensive ones and the other way around with fixed. I'm aware there are very good switchable ones.
  My point was, banana, 10X, just add a 9M resistor inside the terminal, that without any compensation is really bad HF response even for audio, so a cap in parallel, selected for the specific scope and setup or with a compensation trim. It makes no sense at all to make a switchable banana plug!

JS
 

Latest posts

Back
Top