Can we call it "ParaGraphic" ?

.....typical while looking for a "thing" .....for shure you found something "else" ......  ;D

and this "else" is a stuff like this :
http://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ADR_E950_eq.jpg

if i'm not wrong some other manufacturer made similar stuff ....

it will be a today  Diy project ?
(really "captured"  by those unconventional faders !)

r.

Orban did something similar

There is a lomo eq with similar functionality too I believe!

r2d2 said:

.....typical while looking for a "thing" .....for shure you found something "else" ......  ;D

and this "else" is a stuff like this :
http://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ADR_E950_eq.jpg

if i'm not wrong some other manufacturer made similar stuff ....

it will be a today  Diy project ?
(really "captured"  by those unconventional faders !)

r.

Click to expand...

It's actually full parametric....

A few decades ago I played around with the concept of mounting two mono frequency slide pots horizontally, with the boost/cut  pot mounted between the two sliders vertically. A rotary pot at the slider of the boost cut pot could tweak the Q.  This carried the "graphic" concept of WYSIWYG even further. Center frequency was varied by sliding the boost/cut pot left/right. I was going to display the Q graphically with a knob that had wings that expanded out or retracted to indicate wider/narrower bandwidth.

This would have been "cute" with overlapping frequency bands..I never did figure out an effective front faceplate to cover up the works.. perhaps some overlapping dark panels.

Just another example of design mental masturbation...  (we don't have to build every single idea we have.). 

JR

JohnRoberts said:

...
(we don't have to build every single idea we have.). 

JR

Click to expand...

Good lord, I recover my breath!  ;D

JS