abbey road d enfer said:
I wonder what was the idea with the hinged panel; if it was meant to minimize reflection on the perspex, I can think of several lighter solutions... The rest makes perfect sense.
As to the "Bass screen" I wonder what kind of LF efficiency is given by low-density foam sandwiched in hessian... The comment about them not used anymore seems to corroborate.
Hey Abbey,
The hinged panel says 'timber frame, covered both sides with cloth' so I suppose it depends on how thick a frame and what type of timber the frame is made of in defining the weight. Dunno what these are? I would say you're right anyway in that it was meant to minimise reflections off the perspex.
Yep, can't see how the "Bass Screen" would screen much bass at all given the thickness that's shown. The BBC standard low frequency 2 ft square absorbers not shown or used at AR, are around 6" thick, open backed and work quite well for the relatively low cost to build. Abbey Road 1, 2, & 3 certainly has the extra bit of floorspace to spare for something more along those lines so, don't get it?
However, I'm certain I've seen pictures of the shown "Bass Screens" around guitar amps in Beatles and Pink Floyd sessions and have certainly seen the larger screens used in sessions from the late '60's onwards.
Earlier photos from Norman Smith or even earlier from Malcolm Addey sessions tend not to show screens as much. The desired balance of everything being done in the room by *knowing* the room and then *using* the room. I assume they accommodated and adjusted as necessary any bleed, and took advantage of null areas in mic pickup if/when ribbons (*edit: or U48 in fig 8 ) were used.
And then everyone started wanting dry sounds so they could manipulate after the fact or, horror, overdub their part again since they had more than 2 tracks to play with
Cheers mate.
P.S. Yes I remember AK being in almost every decently equipped studio I was in during the '80's.