Hey, just came from the studio and I´m really happy with the unit. I only had time to compare it with the Langevin 5116b, my NEVE clone 1272, a strange moded Pultec RIAA box and a soundcraft GHOST mixr for reference...
Well, at least for piano recordings with TELEFUNKEN ELA-M 251 Tube mic and Yamaha Grand Piano, that´s what we´ve found...
We started with the Ghost, and it really SUCK... Donkey balls. Nothing else to say about it. :? It´s like playing piano in a cardpaper box, if you know what I mean :wink: ... It really SUCKS!!!
Then to the NEVE clone with OEP inputs and LynxAudio outputs. Well it performed 100 times better than the Ghost thing. Much more open sound, more attach, more clean high end, yet not bright. Very musical overall, with nice and big bass also.
Then the four channel Pultec MB1 box you see in this thread...
The OEP channels with the original MB1 circuit performed 10 times better than the NEVE, in this source, with this mic, and this situation... I´m finding out I´m a tube guy after all this DIY :grin:. The whole piano was bigger, with a very pleasant sound. It´s more smooth yet with lot´s of attack and fast response. It´s all much more "together". The harmonics interact better. It just seems more tight...The chords in the mids interacts better with the bass and the bass interacts better with the highs. The final result is much more interesting to my ears than the NEVE clone preamp.
The other channels, with a different circuit was close, but not so good. It sounds really close, but overall, the sound is just a little more messed up. The highs are also not that beaultifull. The input transformers are the BOGEN black ones and he circuit is also a two triodes of a 12ax7 for voltage gain and a parallel 12au7 cathode follower at the output. Still much better han the NEVE clone. I think I got this scheme here in the forum as a Peavey micpreamp MOD, by Bluebird, if I reacll right. It does sounds good, but original MB1 circuit sounded better this time.
I´m using all polypropylene caps in this bogen transformers channels, and in the MB1/OEP channels, I´m using old film and foil polyester at the interstage and oil and paper (bypassed with 100pF micas) at the output.
He had another tube preamp there. It was an original Pultec RIAA preamp, with the big beauty K241D input transformer at the input, like the original Pultec MB1. It was modified by an old Engener here, and it has a transformerless output stage. It´s probably a whyte cathode follower after the original MB1 circuit, but I cannot say for sure. I don´t know the circuit inside this box. Well, it´s not worth talking about this one. Both my channels just clearly blows it away
. We were just not impressed with it. Better than the Ghost, for sure, but not at all what I would expect from a preamp with a PEERLESS K241D at the input. :? I liked my NEVE clone better than this one. Can´t say why, as I´m using OEP transformer in the NEVE :?: . But anyway, I bought this strange Pultecbox home, so I´ll check what´s up with this thing... Oh, and it had tube rectifiers, but so did my first MB1 clone, and it sounds great.
Then to the langevin Tube 5116b, with regulated SolidState PSU. Well, I must say that my new MB1 channels of my four channel box gets very very close to this. Even with OEP and EDCOR transformers... But the Langevin, with a push pull circuit and all those Western trafos sounded a little better. The sound wasn´t very very diferent overall, but there is a quality, an openess in the highs that my preamps didn´t show. It has more space and clearness in the highs.
Tomorrow I´ll try my old MB1 with UTC at the input and Lynx Audio at the output against my new box. I´ll also try the UA 610 and maybe, if we have the time, a SolidState Langevin box and the cheap $50.00 dual NTP preamp...
I´ll post more if this kind of review interests you.