IDC (Insulation Displacement Connectors) were developed to provide a QUICKER way to terminate than crimping. Many previous posts refer to the prsctice of crimping and soldering to achieve best electrical conductivity. If you count yourself in this group I would recommend avoiding IDC.
BTW, all the connector manufacturers make all the different types. Molex and AMP (now TYCO) are the two biggest connector manufacturers and both have what are referred to here as 'Molex' and 'AMP' connectors. Correct nomenclature is crimp pins or IDC (or IDT) style termination.
Look closely at an IDC connector. The metal device to terminate the wires is captive in the connector housing. You place your wire on the plastic holder above the terminator and use a special tool to push the wire into the terminator. The insulation of the wire is 'displaced' and connection made. A better way to describe this last action is that the termination is cut by the terminator which then contacts the wire.
If I had a good pic I'd show this, but bear with my description. IF the wire gauge AND the insulation gauge (that is, the diameter of the stranded or solid conductor and the diameter of the insulation) EXACTLY matches the size of the wire holder and the terminator, the contact/cutter on the connector should touch the strands of wire without cutting any strands. You are probably seeing the flaw in this style of termination. If you do not match wire gauge and connector precisely, or use the incorrect tool, or terminate slightly crooked, you risk cutting strands of wire, which reduces the effectiveness of the termination.
IDC is great on non-critical connections, certainly not power, where there are a LOT of connections to make. IT is designed for high rate production assembly and is simply not as reliable as crimping. And there is no way it is going to match criimping and soldering. Nothing will.