djwig
Member
Hi folks,
now a new attempt to repost my question about the 1540s.
i measured it with a scope and found out some strange results.
look at the pdf file (i used some resistors as described on the lundahl page for asymmetric inputs). the source resistance was adjusted to 600ohms.
lundahl link:
http://www.lundahl.se/pdfs/datash/1540.pdf
my results:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/messungen%20trans.pdf
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
another thing:
there may be a improvement i want to discuss here reguarding in leaving out a transistor in the output stage (one in the darlington stage is cut out as described here:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/kickout_transistor_komplett.JPG ).
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
measuring it gave a much higher cut off frequency
any comments?
and at the end: some pictures of my work so far:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0003.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0004.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0006.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0009.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0010.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_00112.jpg
(sorry, 500k per picture)
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
hope it works
greetings
Jan
now a new attempt to repost my question about the 1540s.
i measured it with a scope and found out some strange results.
look at the pdf file (i used some resistors as described on the lundahl page for asymmetric inputs). the source resistance was adjusted to 600ohms.
lundahl link:
http://www.lundahl.se/pdfs/datash/1540.pdf
my results:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/messungen%20trans.pdf
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
another thing:
there may be a improvement i want to discuss here reguarding in leaving out a transistor in the output stage (one in the darlington stage is cut out as described here:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/kickout_transistor_komplett.JPG ).
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
measuring it gave a much higher cut off frequency
any comments?
and at the end: some pictures of my work so far:
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0003.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0004.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0006.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0009.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_0010.jpg
http://djwig03.100free.com/upload/IMG_00112.jpg
(sorry, 500k per picture)
(maybe you have to cut paste it into a new browser window).
hope it works
greetings
Jan