So the downside to the case forming the return wire from one side of the ribbon is the mic body is suceptable to interference by touch , maybe seperating the return from case/ground would be a good idea . Not sure how feasible that is , it may well have been a cost cutting/ constructional decision and might require extra insulation where the magnet assembly is mounted to the frame . It seems almost certain if the ribbon was feeding the transformer in a balanced fashion and not with one side connected to case , it would provide much better rejection of external noise .
As you can see the lower end of the ribbon is insulated from the frame , the top end isnt ,
If your having it re-ribboned anyway you could arrange the same insulation at the top of the motor , although drilling and cuting the frame would be required , the geometry of the magnets is held by the threaded bar at the top , so it shouldnt make any difference structurally .
Of course these are valuable mics and any destructive mods ,even if it gives better useabillity and lower noise might detract from the re-sale value .
What do you think Doug ? the frame provides the lowest possible resistance path to the transformer ,but a mic thats buzzes when touched is not what you want under any circumstances .
Did they cut a corner on the construction , surely if this mic is mounted on a metal stand the whole apparatus turns into an aerial when touched .