So recently to entertain myself I've been watching some youtube on Graham Hancock and John Anthony West, both men with a TON of experience in Egyptology and the pyramids....as well as some videos about Göbeklitepe and several other sites there in Turkey...
Basically there is very compelling evidence of a very advanced culture PRIOR to what all my history teachers and most modern scholarship suggest...
For instance if you simply goggle "When were th epyramids of Giza built" you will get the MAJORITY of hits saying between 2550-2490 BC...and if you follow the standard model of human development in Gobekli Tepe you will be told that the people of that era were "hunter gatherers"...and did not have advanced technology of any kind...but the evidence clearly on the ground indicates a much older society with very advanced technologies BEFORE these dates and an inclination to date things based on archeological timelines developed in the 1950's and strongly adhered to with no chance of questioning them.
I believe in science, I believe the majority of scholars but it seems to me that there are some obvious bias in the scientific community where long held beliefs are not allowed to be questioned...
For instance the great pyramid of egypt takes up about 13 acres and is almost perfectly aligned (true north not simply magnetic north) NESW within half a degree...not only that but if you take its height and width it is an exact representation of the dimensions of the earth (on a scale of 1/43,200) in fact if you measure the height of the pyramid and multiply by 43,200 you get the polar radius of the earth, then if you multiply the base perimeter of the pyramid and multiply it by the same number you get the equatorial circumference of the earth...egyptologist are aware of this but say it is simply a coincidence...and they base the age of the pyramids upon the dream stone in front of the Sphinx which is an obvious addition added at a later time...speaking of which there is obvious water erosion at the base of the Sphinx pretty much the same kind of water erosion that carved the Grand Canyon...which most archeologist deny is possible...the upper parts of the Sphinx show no signs of this type of erosion, and archeologist claim it is due to wind and sand...its like they are in complete denial of obvious things because the timelines do not meet up with the accepted story.
My point is archeology shows some pretty strong evidence of ancient culture vastly advanced to what the assumed science is telling us is possible (for instance some of the jewelry found in the Tepe locations has perfectly drilled minute holes in the beads through very hard obsidian and other rocks---coming from sites where science tells us these were hunter/gatherers with no advanced technologies)...and these kind of technologies and astrologically significant monuments are all over the world in precisely located sites (all on meridians that are multiples of the number 72)...societies that seem to indicate an advanced culture dating back nearly 20,000 years that seems to have been lost in various 26,000 year cataclysmic earth cycles ( a repeating pattern in the geology of earth)...
I wonder what is to be made of the evidence and why the reticence to accept optional ideas regarding human development?
We do have human skulls that have been dated to 160,000 years ago that are exactly the same as modern skulls, yet history will suggest that modern culture is the most advanced we have ever been and that is roughly about 6,000 year old...
The fact that pyramid is off less than a degree kinda disposes the idea that aliens had anything to do with it in my book...if you came form outer space and helped build that monument it would not be off at all...the degree of less than 1% makes me think it is purely human, but on a scale of advancement that makes modern culture seem weak in comparison.
What if there were cultures far more advanced than we are willing to admit who were wiped out by cataclysmic events so that ONLY monuments and myth survived...?
If there was a storm to hit America only 3 magnitudes bigger than Katrina it would wipe out 100 major cities and take years and years to rebuild...(Parts of New Orleans are still not rebuilt)...go up one more magnitude and you take out 1000 cities and the chance of modern culture surviving moves waaay down to single digit percentages...and if you want to see how quickly civilisation can be lost simply park a car in a forest and come back in 10 years...in 100 years it will be completely unusable in 200 it will be gone.
Basically there is very compelling evidence of a very advanced culture PRIOR to what all my history teachers and most modern scholarship suggest...
For instance if you simply goggle "When were th epyramids of Giza built" you will get the MAJORITY of hits saying between 2550-2490 BC...and if you follow the standard model of human development in Gobekli Tepe you will be told that the people of that era were "hunter gatherers"...and did not have advanced technology of any kind...but the evidence clearly on the ground indicates a much older society with very advanced technologies BEFORE these dates and an inclination to date things based on archeological timelines developed in the 1950's and strongly adhered to with no chance of questioning them.
I believe in science, I believe the majority of scholars but it seems to me that there are some obvious bias in the scientific community where long held beliefs are not allowed to be questioned...
For instance the great pyramid of egypt takes up about 13 acres and is almost perfectly aligned (true north not simply magnetic north) NESW within half a degree...not only that but if you take its height and width it is an exact representation of the dimensions of the earth (on a scale of 1/43,200) in fact if you measure the height of the pyramid and multiply by 43,200 you get the polar radius of the earth, then if you multiply the base perimeter of the pyramid and multiply it by the same number you get the equatorial circumference of the earth...egyptologist are aware of this but say it is simply a coincidence...and they base the age of the pyramids upon the dream stone in front of the Sphinx which is an obvious addition added at a later time...speaking of which there is obvious water erosion at the base of the Sphinx pretty much the same kind of water erosion that carved the Grand Canyon...which most archeologist deny is possible...the upper parts of the Sphinx show no signs of this type of erosion, and archeologist claim it is due to wind and sand...its like they are in complete denial of obvious things because the timelines do not meet up with the accepted story.
My point is archeology shows some pretty strong evidence of ancient culture vastly advanced to what the assumed science is telling us is possible (for instance some of the jewelry found in the Tepe locations has perfectly drilled minute holes in the beads through very hard obsidian and other rocks---coming from sites where science tells us these were hunter/gatherers with no advanced technologies)...and these kind of technologies and astrologically significant monuments are all over the world in precisely located sites (all on meridians that are multiples of the number 72)...societies that seem to indicate an advanced culture dating back nearly 20,000 years that seems to have been lost in various 26,000 year cataclysmic earth cycles ( a repeating pattern in the geology of earth)...
I wonder what is to be made of the evidence and why the reticence to accept optional ideas regarding human development?
We do have human skulls that have been dated to 160,000 years ago that are exactly the same as modern skulls, yet history will suggest that modern culture is the most advanced we have ever been and that is roughly about 6,000 year old...
The fact that pyramid is off less than a degree kinda disposes the idea that aliens had anything to do with it in my book...if you came form outer space and helped build that monument it would not be off at all...the degree of less than 1% makes me think it is purely human, but on a scale of advancement that makes modern culture seem weak in comparison.
What if there were cultures far more advanced than we are willing to admit who were wiped out by cataclysmic events so that ONLY monuments and myth survived...?
If there was a storm to hit America only 3 magnitudes bigger than Katrina it would wipe out 100 major cities and take years and years to rebuild...(Parts of New Orleans are still not rebuilt)...go up one more magnitude and you take out 1000 cities and the chance of modern culture surviving moves waaay down to single digit percentages...and if you want to see how quickly civilisation can be lost simply park a car in a forest and come back in 10 years...in 100 years it will be completely unusable in 200 it will be gone.