Script said:
Free phase meter plug-ins?
Over the last couple of years I tested a few of these free plug-ins -- some are just too lame, others give readings that don't seem right... some wouldn't even recognize if there was an 'audible' problem. I also have that Edison thing: yet another (unreliable) reading :-\ [--> Withered parts, leaking caps?]
So sometimes I end up cross-checking the different readings and also do the time-proven switch-to-mono compatibility check. It's surprising that some commercial electronic music CDs by independant labels actually have massive phase (L-R polarity) problems. But since this music doesn't get much airplay anyway (if at all), some labels/engineers don't seem to care and, if they are aware of the problem, seem to accept out-of-phase as yet another sonic flavour
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big grin :D :D"
. For CD-only releases this might be OK, to some degree at least -- and especially if switching to mono still yields satisfying results --, for vinyl however it's deadly.
Interesting to hear about the Edison. Curious, how do you know its reading is inaccurate?
What are you using as your 'trusted reference' ?
The two Edisons I have show different readings, indeed does give me that the feeling that they're
then most likely both off, but IIRC there's an internal adjustment, maybe it's just a matter
of calibration.
And let's actually first start by saying what we demand of a phase meter.
A highly accurate response on steady state signals ? Or little more than
some idea 'how mono' or 'how stereo'or 'how over-stereo' our mix is ?
Well, I am pretty sure I cannot spend $2000 plus for a precision hardware phase meter right now, but a DIY high-precision phase meter project and PCB would be great.
I don't think there's a need to spend that much on a phase-meter.
How much accuracy do you need ? Risking to sound like an advertisement
for that Mancini/Harris/Intersil-circuit, it claims 1% acc.
Need more for audio ? I doubt it.
So then little reason to use a more elaborate circuit than this one. While not revolutionary, note that it's 'smart' by using matched comparators (the transistor-array). Low parts count then results, while still having good accuracy.
While sure nice to have a PCB for it, that circuit is in essence just
three IC-packages, so putting it on veroboard (or the likes) is easy.
The only spot where a dedicated PCB might be nice is for the transistor-array,
which doesn't seem to come in 0.1" pitch, but SMD-only. I'm using an adapter-board
to regular pitch for it and the rest will be on vero.
The suggested ground plane in the Application Note might be ignored
when only using it for audio.
Bye,
Peter