Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Project Specific Discussions
Dynamic Processors
Drip drip drip, ------
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support GroupDIY:
Message
[QUOTE="JohnRoberts, post: 1013342, member: 4409"] We need a proper definition of what the product (SKU) being sold is, and then what does the customer think they are getting for his/her money? In my judgement customer expectations for the kit business have changed over the several decades I have been involved/paying attention. Back in the 70s when I started selling kits the consumers were trying to save money by providing their own cheap labor to acquire some functional product at a significant discount below retail. This business model got upset by factory automation dramatically reducing the labor content. By the 80s there were commercial SKUs being sold for less than my parts cost. :unsure: For education the vast majority of my customers were not in it for the education but I marketed most kits via construction articles in Popular Electronics that involved a lucid description of operational theory and in some cases design equations. This accidentally created an opportunity for college students who were tasked with changing an existing design for course credit. After I figured this out I included more design equations and sold more kits to college pukes trying to get course credit easily. Now I am less sure about what kit buyers are motivated by. I remain unsure about some thirst for education. If you want to learn how to design stuff, figure out how products work by repairing them. For extra credit repair them without schematics. Then design some simple stuff yourself. Nowadays with most functions integrated into ICs circuit design involves reading the manufacturer's app notes and copying it correctly. Amusing to me was one popular kit author (now RIP) who screwed up even that, but at this point it doesn't matter. If clones are of questionable merit, what does that say about clone kit's? JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Project Specific Discussions
Dynamic Processors
Drip drip drip, ------
Join the conversation!
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
It's FREE!
Participate in both public and private conversations with people that share your interest
Start new threads
See less ads
Enter your email address to join:
Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.
There's already a member associated with this email address. Please
log in
or
retrieve your password
.
Already a member?
Click here to log in
Don't like ads?
Did you know that registered members can turn off the ads?
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join:
Thank you! Please check your email inbox to continue.
There's already a member associated with this email address. Please
log in
or
retrieve your password
.
Already a member?
Click here to log in
Top