Nope, that's a K47. You can tell because the backplate holes don't exceed the edge of the diaphragm.I have this in a Cad GXL 3000 that I didn't remeber I had. But the capsule is bought from Microphone parts for sure, maybe 15 years ago. When a look at the K67 at their site it has the white surrounding. Might be a RK87?
If you like the sound of it you could use it. It's sort of hard to comment on what to use in one because it's a tube mic hasn't been made in decades so they all sound different. If you want to believe the manual the U47's cardioid response should be a smooth 3-4 dB from 2K-10K, then rolling off at what looks like 12K. The RK47 is something like +4 or 5 dB at 5K, but it doesn't have the boost in the after that (at least from the measurements I've seen). Personally I don't like the way the RK47 sounds, I don't know how to describe it, but I think it has a sort of muddy boxy midrange honk and I find it always sounds like there's been a ton of processing like when you see people use programs like Voicemeter to "make a $25 microphone sound like a $1000 microphone" or whatever they say on YouTube. I think it's a downgrade in a lot of mods, and I cringe when I see a bright but solid microphone get "upgraded" with an RK47 (like the edge terminated Rode mics or some of the Blue mics).Ok, good. I am starting a U47 build at the monent, so I could possibly try it there?
Quote
I do apreciate that. I bought a U47 type mic from Dave Pearman in ca 2005. It sounded great, but at the time I was a kind of "it must be original"- nerd, so I sourced an original Bv8 transformer, original Neumann capsule and 3 VF14 tubes, and I must say it was much, much more difficult to source items in i those days. I came a cross a body from Wagner. Then I sent it all to the master Peter Drefahl in Germany to assemble it. But in the end, in recording, the mic didn't nessarily sound better then other, cheaper mics. So I find it very difficult to decide what tube/capsule/parts should be in a mic. It depends on the audio you put into it. And also the ear that listens?If you like the sound of it you could use it. It's sort of hard to comment on what to use in one because it's a tube mic hasn't been made in decades so they all sound different. If you want to believe the manual the U47's cardioid response should be a smooth 3-4 dB from 2K-10K, then rolling off at what looks like 12K. The RK47 is something like +4 or 5 dB at 5K, but it doesn't have the boost in the after that (at least from the measurements I've seen). Personally I don't like the way the RK47 sounds, I don't know how to describe it, but I think it has a sort of muddy boxy midrange honk and I find it always sounds like there's been a ton of processing like when you see people use programs like Voicemeter to "make a $25 microphone sound like a $1000 microphone" or whatever they say on YouTube. I think it's a downgrade in a lot of mods, and I cringe when I see a bright but solid microphone get "upgraded" with an RK47 (like the edge terminated Rode mics or some of the Blue mics).
Yeah, I'm in the same boat. I find because there's such a boost and then a sharp decline they sound kind of lo-fi. I'm glad I only paid $40 for it. It's hard for me to look at any of those capsules when 3U Audio and Takstar exist. I think the K67 and Chinese edge terminated capsules from that factory can be decent, but the companies I mentioned just seem to beat them.I still have some K47 from WGT I have never found a place where to use them for years, they sound nothing like real K47/49
Enter your email address to join: