JW
Well-known member
I've been building some API 536 channel strips into my Yamaha console.
I have a couple questions about the pan circuit.
I've attached a schematic drawing of how Yamaha did it (after their final opamp) It's sort of similar to API, but in an effort to make it even closer to API to see what the difference was, I wired up a 10K pan pot how they (API) did. I attached this schematic as well. It's exactly the same as the API 536 schematic I've come across, but no stereo bus. Instead, it goes into just 8 program buses, with 33K mix resistors.
Anyway, I'm running into a problem of the "pan in" circuit being too low in volume in comparison to "pan off". I see that the 1K (mix level) pot can be used to adjust the level right before the pan pot. I'm assuming this is a trim to match the levels between pan on/pan off. But even with this 1K trimmer zeroed out, I'm about 3dB below the "pan off" circuit.
It seems to be to be an obvious solution to place this 1K trimmer in the "pan off" circuit instead, to trim that down to match "pan on" and then trim the whole thing up a bit with the DOA.
It begs the question, why did API put the trimmer there? In what circumstance would a DOA driving a 10K pot actually be higher in level (and subsequently need to be trimmed down?) in comparison to no pan pot at all? Seems like the trimmer should naturally be on the "pan off" circuit.
In fact, in the Yamaha schematic, I see that 330 ohm series resistor doing just that (I think?)
(Another thing to note, and which I am curious about. Yamaha has the resistors that are going from the pan pot's wipers to ground (1.8K in Yamaha's case) on the 'common' side of the pan switch, which also puts them in the circuit when pan switch is off. API only has them in circuit when pan is switched on. )
I have a couple questions about the pan circuit.
I've attached a schematic drawing of how Yamaha did it (after their final opamp) It's sort of similar to API, but in an effort to make it even closer to API to see what the difference was, I wired up a 10K pan pot how they (API) did. I attached this schematic as well. It's exactly the same as the API 536 schematic I've come across, but no stereo bus. Instead, it goes into just 8 program buses, with 33K mix resistors.
Anyway, I'm running into a problem of the "pan in" circuit being too low in volume in comparison to "pan off". I see that the 1K (mix level) pot can be used to adjust the level right before the pan pot. I'm assuming this is a trim to match the levels between pan on/pan off. But even with this 1K trimmer zeroed out, I'm about 3dB below the "pan off" circuit.
It seems to be to be an obvious solution to place this 1K trimmer in the "pan off" circuit instead, to trim that down to match "pan on" and then trim the whole thing up a bit with the DOA.
It begs the question, why did API put the trimmer there? In what circumstance would a DOA driving a 10K pot actually be higher in level (and subsequently need to be trimmed down?) in comparison to no pan pot at all? Seems like the trimmer should naturally be on the "pan off" circuit.
In fact, in the Yamaha schematic, I see that 330 ohm series resistor doing just that (I think?)
(Another thing to note, and which I am curious about. Yamaha has the resistors that are going from the pan pot's wipers to ground (1.8K in Yamaha's case) on the 'common' side of the pan switch, which also puts them in the circuit when pan switch is off. API only has them in circuit when pan is switched on. )