JohnRoberts said:
Sorry if I triggered you... if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it may be a duck. There appears to be some funny business going on in multiple larger cities.
A study conducted by Princeton University regarding the BLM protests concluded that
"In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity. Peaceful protests are reported in over 2,400 distinct locations around the country. Violent demonstrations, meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations — under 10% of the areas that experienced peaceful protests."
https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf
Yes, there was 'some funny business in some cities'. But it is not representative of BLM (see above).
A couple weeks ago I went to the BLM website to try to get a sense of their goals, and their top banner was "defund the police".
We talked about the "defund the police" slogan before. It doesn't mean to get rid of a police force, but to start structural changes.
Since you have been repeatedly been willing to dismiss almost everything Trump says as mere hyperbole I wonder why you don't grant equal indulgance to the other side?
But you are comfortable suggesting that this shooting was a false flag incident.
No, I didn't.
As I wrote, I have no idea what happend with that shooting and thus wouldn't comment. I was talking about the bigger picture.
To paraphrase my thoughts (again, not on this incident but on events in recent months): I wouldn't consider it unheard of, that unrest hase been stocked by those who profit from it most. It has happened before and will likely happen again. Here in Germany the Nazis burned down the Reichstag and blamed it on the Communists...
Back to BLM once more, there is no evidence of a higher incidence of violent crime because of the protests:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-09/don-t-blame-police-protests-for-homicide-spikes