Hi,
Thanks for the nice words about the site.
Sadly, I never got my questions here answered but that was 4 years ago and it doesn’t matter any more. At the time, I was working on a NEVE-based preamp design (http://www.moxtone.com/Dual_microphone_preamplifier.htm) and decided to use a substitute Sowter transformer that I had at hand but the results I was getting were not quite what I expected. When I biased the output transistor (using standard procedure, as explained by Mike in his preceding post), I got rather disappointing THD- and bandwith-related readings so I wanted to find out what the nominal transistor current (which is also the transformer magnetization DC current) specified by the manufacturer actually was. Later on, I decided to switch to another brand, which turned out to be a good move, and happily forgot all about the original transformer.
As regards the 6C33 tube, my experience with it has been mixed. The tube can be purchased relatively cheaply but its implementation is far from trivial as it places huge demands on the output transformer and the driver stage of the amplifier, plus it requires a high filament current. The 6C33 tube amplifier shown on my site is an original design by Erno Borbely, slightly adjusted to my own needs. Honestly, I am not overly satisfied with its performance (both sound- and measurement-wise) but the amplifier is very stable and I’m sure it has plenty of tweaking potential (I’ll have to revisit this project someday, time and money permitting). Another issue worth noting with regard to this tube is a relatively high dependence of anode current upon temperature. For instance, when I had an Ayon Spark 6C33 tube amplifier brought in for service a few days ago, I measured a rise of the anode current by over 100% (from 80 to 180mA!!) during the few minutes required for the amplifier and tubes to reach their operating temperature. The Ayon Spark uses fixed bias, which is generally avoided by designers precisely because of the huge current drift. On the other hand, auto-bias would require insanely powerful cathode resistors and cause the amplifier to heat up even more. It’s a no win situation really. Another issue with the 6C33 is its socket that needs to be replaced quite frequently, due to high temperature oxidation. AFAIK, the Russians used this tube in their MIG planes (power supply regulators) and replaced the sockets together with tubes (after about 1,000 hours).
I am not a guitar amp expert so take my opinion as just that but I don’t believe the 6C33 would be the best choice for a guitar amp, and here’s why:
- the 6C33 would require a very complex driver stage to drive it into saturation;
-the output transformer would have to be very complex as well because of the high DC current;
-the 6C33 has been designed to withstand large mechanical loads and vibration whereas guitar amps actually benefit from some mechanical-acoustical coupling-feedback.
I don’t think I have ever seen a 6C33 septar socket adapter. Besides, I’m not sure if there are that many tube testers out there that can actually measure the 6C33 (Ia=200mA, Ua=180V, Vh=12V, Ih=3,5A!!!). Why not improvise an adhoc measurement setup of your own to test the tube, which is precisely what I did back in the day.
Mind you, it isn’t my intention to dissuade you in any way from your guitar project. I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the possible issues and areas of concern should you choose the 6C33 for the project.
So far, I can’t say that I have noticed any significant differences between the Svetlana and Reflektor production runs. IMO, any one will be fine as long as the tube is protected from constant overload and kept at max. 80% of total dissipation.
Regards,
Milan