Referring to the two bottle with 5879 input sage:
[quote author="PRR"]> I always wanted to build a pentode pre too
Just FYI: NYDave's plan has you buy a Pentode and then convert it to a Triode. A waste of two grids!
However, triode is better here: Pentodes have noise issues, and we don't want the tremendous gain that a pentode is capable of. He picked that particular 5879 tube because it was manufactured for audio applications, including low-noise when triode strapped. There are a half-ton of other triodes you could use instead, but you may have to buy several extras and select for low noise. With 5879, you are unlikely to run into a hisser, and it isn't expensive. (It has also been featured in some notoriously famous audio gear, but so what?)[/quote]
I'm not seeing this mentioned anywhere else here; sorry if it is and I missed it: The antique literature almost always refers to triode connected pentodes as having noise advantages over regular triodes. There must be something to it, given the predominance of triode connected pentodes in pro gear before 1955 or so. Still seen in the Langevin, Gates and Collins preamps up until the 1960's.
I'd guess that as more and more loop feedback got used, the desire/need to stick with triode connected pentodes for noise purposes lessened. I'd also bet that the move towards a pentode front end followed by a triode connected pentode output stage had a lot to do with gain compensation for the increasing use of loop feedback, and the desire to still hit that magic 40 db mark with two stages.