pucho812
Well-known member
Well it's that time of year again, fire season.
The latest in electrical companies managing California is, they have decided to turn the grid off leaving hundreds of thousands without power purely on high risk fire days. While I do get why, they are trying to avoid the massive destruction we had last year., I don't see it as option for the long run. What I don't understand is not one person was charged not one company held accountable in the whole grand scheme of things. Sure PG&E agreed to pay 11 billion in insurance for the damages but they also get to raise the rates to get it all back according to our state government. I don't understand why they can't address the problem, or at least show that they are attempting to address the problem vs the band aid of just turn the grid off for a few days.
The latest in electrical companies managing California is, they have decided to turn the grid off leaving hundreds of thousands without power purely on high risk fire days. While I do get why, they are trying to avoid the massive destruction we had last year., I don't see it as option for the long run. What I don't understand is not one person was charged not one company held accountable in the whole grand scheme of things. Sure PG&E agreed to pay 11 billion in insurance for the damages but they also get to raise the rates to get it all back according to our state government. I don't understand why they can't address the problem, or at least show that they are attempting to address the problem vs the band aid of just turn the grid off for a few days.