I don’t think anyone believes they are or sure what the technology is.Please pardon a naive question I mean with the best intention: Why do we believe these will be actual VF14s? What is the technology behind them?
Anyone wanna wager how that they’ll charge for it; after the $30k 670?I have 'inside information' that Telefunken is planning to recreate a VF14.
Now let's hope that it will be a real one, not a glass tube inside the housing of a metal tube, like they did before...
I don't see any way it could be anything but quite expensive. Beyond the fact that the price for an original is equivalent to a boat payment or an actual small boat, I doubt there is a wide enough market to support a big run of theseAnyone wanna wager how that they’ll charge for it; after the $30k 670?
I have 'inside information' that Telefunken is planning to recreate a VF14.
Now let's hope that it will be a real one, not a glass tube inside the housing of a metal tube, like they did before...
No way, really. They can ask some vaccum tube factories to do it (how many left worldwide?), but they will not build a factory to do them themselves.I have 'inside information' that Telefunken is planning to recreate a VF14.
Now let's hope that it will be a real one, not a glass tube inside the housing of a metal tube, like they did before...
Because by now very few people will have a point of reference haha…swapping 6072s and hearing the difference is still quite easy …but vf14s not so muchIf most people don’t even like new-construction 6072s, why would any company expect new-construction VF14s to get the seal of approval?
True. I guess at some point (fairly soon), *any* VF14 is better than none.Because by now very few people will have a point of reference haha…swapping 6072s and hearing the difference is still quite easy …but vf14s not so much
THIS.No way, really. They can ask some vaccum tube factories to do it (how many left worldwide?), but they will not build a factory to do them themselves.
Also, to my guess, a 701 production would be more interesting and more profitable. I wonder how many top mic brands would love to buy them...
This and if someone somehow manages to do it, it will be incredibly expensive. I can't really see the point. I'm happy about every tube that rises from the dead, but it has to remain affordable, otherwise the existing alternatives are much more interesting. Tubes for microphones usually means selection...this theme comes up on a regular basis, some tech-optimists thinking "how hard could it be, it's old technology"
But I think the making of really good audio/signal tubes is pretty much a lost art
That's (unfortunately) the only 'Telefunken' we have nowadays...Oh, wait. Telefunken no longer exists. So you mean Telefunken USA?