PZM design and assembly

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Svart

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
5,134
Location
Atlanta GA USA
There have been a few threads about PZMs and their theory but it's time to get in depth here.

I bought some PZM parts in theblackmarket recently and got them working fairly well but have decided to build another set using a different method.

The PZMs I currently have are 1'x1' pieces of 1/4 acrylic, clear because we all know dyes throw off your sound..l :green:

but seriously, these are made with standard electret mic elements that face the acrylic. As I understand it, the proper way is to face the elements out FROM the acrylic and have a blocking/reflective surface a set distance out from the capsule.

Now, I have not been able to find what the proper distance the block over the capsule should be from the capsule itself, or from the acrylic sheet. I drilled a hole in the sheet that allows the placement of the electret capsule AT the same height as the acrylic. Most I have seen recess this slightly, and I wonder if there is a proper distance for this too.

I am using JFET based amps for the linkwitz modded capsules which are pana wm61s.

I roughed out a small bit of plastic for the block over the capsule and it works pretty good but I get a honky hype in the upper mids that is not there when the block is not there leading me to believe there is going to be a proper distance for it to be from the capsule/acrylic sheet.

Also I understand that acrylic has been deemed a good material for the sheet, moreso than wood or metal. Does this carry over to the block also? would a change in material of the block change the overall sound? I am going to eventually build a huge pair of sheets to hang for room mics once the details are hammered out.



many questions need to be discussed here!

:thumb:
 
> face the elements out FROM the acrylic and have a blocking/reflective surface a set distance out from the capsule.

Huh?

The base theory involves an infinitely large hard wall, and a small mike a small distance from it, "large" and "small" being more or less than a half wavelength.

Half wavelength at 20Hz is 28 feet or 7 meters. A smaller wall will be omni in the bass and hemispherical at some higher frequency, about 500Hz for your 1' plate in free space.

Half wavelength at 20KHz is 0.34" or 9mm. Ideally your sound entrance is smaller, and its distance from the wall is smaller. (In practice, 1" distance is really quite fine, the HF combfilter is inoffensive.)

Crown mounted their PZM capsules "facing" the wall in part for protection, and in part because they used hearing-aid capsules that had a big ring in the top octave, which they "fixed" by filling the gap with foam.
 
What we have are three different ways to do very-nearly the same thing. There is enough difference to keep the theorists busy. The difference is all in the top octave, and with small diaphragms will be completely lost in the real world of recording.

You can also throw a 635A on a slab of foam. This works astonishingly well.

Go by what is easiest, or most sturdy, or looks the most impressive.
 
thanks guys, I would like to actually build one of each as close to perfect as possible and then test each one but I can't seem to find actual formulae for certain measurements.

any ideas where I could look?
 
Back
Top