Soundcraft 2400 - Ceramic Capacitors - Negative Tempco

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dr nEon

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
232
Location
Grate Britain
Hi folks..

I have a Soundcraft question which I can't find the answer to anywhere, despite endless googling...

In the Soundcraft 2400 circuit (and other related models), there are little 100pF ceramics in the transistor buffers within the EQ circuit, between collector and base - these are the Cdom or miller caps, right?  In my desk, these are all orange tipped ceramic plate types, meaning that they have a negative tempco, N150.

On one of my spare channels, I noticed that one of these ceramics is physically cracked in half , and I need to replace it.  So my question is, is it OK in this circuit to replace it with a modern little multilayer c0g type, or must it be N150?

This has got me thinking...there are other ceramics elsewhere in the channels that are black tipped NP0 , but always, in these buffers, are the N150 type.  So why would that be?  I've read about how negative tempco types are sometimes utilised to take advantage of the neg temp effect, stabilising RF and IF stages, tuned circuits for drift etc... up in radio land.  Would Soundcraft have particularly  specified the use of N150 types for this reason, or is it more likely that they used them because they were close to 'ideal' , and dirt cheap?

I'd be interested to hear some opinions from some of you gurus as to whether I can ignore the tempco spec.

Cheers,

nEon.
 
As they use the same value, same configuration in both low-mid and high-mid, I think it would be safe to assume that tempco is of no significance...

jakob E.
 
Ahh..yes, of course!... I hadn't thought of it, that way.  Thanks for the clarity, Jakob!

I don't know what other differences exist between the np0 and n150 dielectrics (linearity, distortion etc..) but  I guess that  - given the job they are doing in this circuit -  using the np0  in place of a n150 dielectric,  won't change the sound of the channel...this would be cool!

Cheers!

nEon.
 
A 100pFd cap will be "perfect" (unlike huge values of ceramic).

I'd suspect that N150 happened to be common (most available) when 99.9% of 100pFd caps were used to tune wound coils to RF frequencies with half-percent drift as the set warmed up.  NP0 should be fine for audio.
 
Back
Top