UTC LS10X in reverse as output trafo ?

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Silvas

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
727
Location
Chia, Colombia
Hello guys,

Has someone tried it in such application in a tube gainstage ? Just a thought i had despite the high ratio... Thanks !
 
I mean, why?  You just have a really expensive desirable input you want to use incorrectly?  Yeah, it’ll pass signal, but not wound for that purpose. 
 
EmRR said:
I mean, why?  You just have a really expensive desirable input you want to use incorrectly?  Yeah, it’ll pass signal, but not wound for that purpose.

Why ? Curiosity ! That's exactly the kind of answer i was looking for ! Thanks a lot !! I might part with them too ;-)

 
I am not familiar with that specific transformer but generally input transformers pass much less power than output transformers, so more magnetic flux means more core material, more copper, etc.

JR
 
use to call this ol guy on the phone and he would hold me hostage reciting all these transformer tidbits from memory, so i would write them down,

compiled the notes in the pic below,

one thing he said was the LS-10X had the same lams as the smaller A-10, it was just a bunch of nested shield cans in a big case,

i never hacked one so no first hand experience,

if it is the 31 UI lam, then you can calculate the flux, as it probably has the same tuns as the A-10, which is 8800 turns of #43

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/0e07cc59-2f5a-481f-967d-12c7363b86fa/downloads/1ctumb47q_789019.png?ver=1566021456329

a 0.39" stack of 31 UI at 8800 turns = 4.3. KGauss, nickel will take 5 KG before saturation,

max input voltage on the pri side will = ten times that on the secondary, so that transformer will take 24 volts on the secondary if used backwards, certainly enough headroom to be used as an output, but your signal will be stepped down 10:1 instead of 4:1 for your typical tube output rig, but you can amplify that,

what about the increased current on the secondary over what it usually sees?

DCR will save you there,  secondary DCR on A-10 is 1600 per coil, so 3200 series.

24 volts / 3200 = 7.5 ma, #43 is speced at 4.8 ma, which can usually be doubled or tripled, so yes, you can use the LS-10X  as an output transformer and it might sound very nice if it sounds anything like the A-10 used frontwards.

phase shift at 20 hz -  3200 DCR / 250 K XL @ 20 Hz = 0.0127  arc tan 0.0127 = 0.72 degrees, not bad.
(assume 2000 Henries sec ind @ 20 Hz)



 

Attachments

  • doc.JPG
    doc.JPG
    476.9 KB
DCR is different from an A-10.

My example measurements are:

LS-10X
62 : 3100 DCR

A-10
69 : 2500 DCR

It’s usually A and HA that are considered ‘same coil’. 

 
I have tested LS-10X and A-10 in the exact same mic preamp, as the input transformer. Coils paralleled on primary and secondary, so wired 1:10.  Secondary feeding the grid directly, unloaded. So no impedance loss. The LS-10X is flat out to 40Khz. A-10 is down 1.5dB at 20Khz relative to 1Khz. They also sound different.
 
the LS-10X could have a fatter stack meaning less turns, less DCR, less capacitance which would increase hi end,
 
Back
Top