Project Veritas Exposes Pfizer Executive Discussing Mutating Covid-19

[living sounds]

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/06/health/covid-217-shots-hypervaccination-lancet/index.html

A man in Germany got 217 Covid shots. He's fine.

 

[crazydoc]

Where is this data? I've been curious about that. Not talking phone calls to the 1-800 party line.....

Well, you have to accept calls to poison control as data since many of the OD's will not need medical intervention. Here's a poison control bulletin from 9/2021 showing ivermectin exposure cases and outcomes for that year. I note that cases fell after August, when the FDA tweet came out. Not many cases, but well worth a "You are not a horse" tweet.
https://piper.filecamp.com/uniq/yyQHzDB8N11tCbpv.pdf

Here's a study of Oregon ivermectin OD's that were seen in a medical setting - significant percent taking animal dewormers.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36374218/

Wonder where these overdoses stand in comparison to say, aspirin....

Aspirin and tylenol OD's are much more common - they are over the counter, cheap, and mainly accidental ingestion by children or suicide attempts.

 

[scott2000]

Thanks for the data... Study leaves a bit to be desired..
I remember when all this stuff kicked off and I had mentioned my brother in law, he's Peruvian, who got covid pretty bad and was given some ivermectin from his Dr. in Peru. I think it was for cows. I'd have to look back in the thread....He was was freaking out because he was told to swig an entire small bottle or something.
In his case, he was 90% better the next day... Totally fine 2 days after taking it... But who knows... Those PCR tests in the beginning seem to have some controversy.. maybe he actually had worms..lol

Couple of neighbors down the road have covid right now....

 

[AnalogPackrat]

Ivermectin has still not been shown conclusively to have a beneficial effect on the treatment or prophylaxis of covid.

Ivermectin has become a controversial potential medicine for coronavirus disease 2019. Some early studies suggested clinical benefits in treatment of infection. However, the body of evidence includes studies of varying quality. Furthermore, some trials have now been identified as potentially fraudulent.
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/9/2/ofab645/6509922

So a two year old study is the latest and greatest? No other data post 2021 need be considered by "the science."

The drug in human doses can still have serious side effects, and in animal formulations caused increased ER visits for OD's.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ivermectin-oral-route/side-effects/drg-20064397

By your own subsequent admission in a later post, very few of these "ODs" required medical intervention. And the cases fell off, not because of the FDA memo, but because they banned its use.

The FDA posts were inappropriate (though funny), and were I think mainly concerned with people treating themselves with animal formulations.

Inappropriate and not funny.

They took them down with no admission of wrongdoing.

Which isn't the same thing as being wrong. No surprise that another huge Federal bureaucracy hasn't been made accountable for their misdeeds.

From the stipulation of dismissal:
Neither this Stipulation of Dismissal nor the actions described herein shall constitute an admission or evidence of any issue of fact or law, wrongdoing, misconduct, or liability on the part of any party to this litigation. March 21, 2024 Case 3:22-cv-00184 Document 74 Filed on 03/21/24 in TXSD Pag

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24495557-fda-stipulation-of-dismissal

Yay! The bureaucracy survives unscathed!

 

[57sputnik]

WRT Ivermectin efficacy last updated March 21, 2024: https://c19ivm.org/

 

[57sputnik]

Secret Docs Reveal Germany's Public Health Agency Warned Lockdowns Cause More Harm Than Good

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...-agency-warned-lockdowns-cause-more-harm-good

Virologist Klaus Stöhr, once the WHO pandemic commissioner, said the revealed protocols once again show that the “risk assessment was not based on data.” According to Stöhr, “his hair stood on end when it came to (Germany’s) pandemic plan.” Stöhr also commented on the fact that the RKI protocols uncovered that experts were telling the government that there is little data to support widespread mask adoption for the public. “And the fact that what was known about FFP2 masks was completely ignored is just two small building blocks.” There was “a lot more data available where it was seen that the work was not based on evidence,” he said. The scientist referred to “curfews, border closures, 2G/3G (areas restricted based on vaccination status), and the side effects of lockdowns” as further examples of this. Stöhr noted that “these are all things that were known – including that the vaccines could not halt the spread of the virus.” He said that the vaccines could not end the pandemic, and it was “clear from the beginning that the vaccine couldn’t do that.” He is now calling for a commission or review process to avoid the mistakes made by the government during the Covid-19 era in the future. Virologist Hendrik Streeck, who was appointed to the RKI expert council, also stated: “I’m very surprised that entire pages about vaccinations, for example, were blacked out,” he said to Welt. “And I wonder what it says, why the public shouldn’t see it.”

Once again the "conspiracy theorists," such as myself, were right all along. We listened to the people who were silenced by their governments and made our own decisions.