C
ClaudeTucker
Guest
Cyril now has a site featuring his Wireless World Articles
http://uk.geocities.com/[email protected]/index.html
http://uk.geocities.com/[email protected]/index.html
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :sad:I had available three 4.9metre long development cables having nominal RF impedances of 30 ohm, 16 ohm and 14 ohm. I selected the 14 ohm impedance, my highest capacitance cable, labelled as #55 made using Raychem 55A0111 wire. With 440pF/metre, it has slightly more than double the Supra 2.0 capacitance, perhaps that might produce a measurable distortion difference. This 440pF/metre presents a very modest capacitance compared to some commercially available cables which have more than 1500pF/metre.
With this cable and 3 volts 1kHz drive into the 4.7 ohm/25mH test load, something was clearly wrong. Distortions increased almost 30 fold to now measure some -60dB second and third harmonic, so immediately switched off the power supply, but too late, both power supply rail 4A fuses blew as the amplifier disappeared in smoke. The output devices, several small signal devices, PCB tracks and five of the small signal section resistors were destroyed. The 100nF capacitor and 10 ohm resistor in the Zobel network and the output inductor, when removed and measured, were undamaged.
Why tantalums? Why not aluminium lytics? Their performance has improved to a point they are comparable - or even better - in many aspects. Is there a "technique" for paralleling components?tv said:Now I need to find a technique to parallel tantalums and cog/npo m-layers to minimize distortion and up the vfm.
Enter your email address to join: