8ch AD converter, another cheap option

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

chrissugar

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
1,315
Location
EU
I had the ADI8DS and sold it after a short time because I thought it is too expensive and the quality not that good.
Although I'm not a fan of RME converters I think this would be a better alternative for 8ch AD converter DIY.
Take this module, add a PSU, some Neutriks (maybe some buffers or transformers) and put it in a 1U rack and you have a decent AD converter that goes up to 192K has AES-EBU out, ADAT out, and word clock.
Not bad for 266Euros plus what you add.
I'm talking about the addon conversion module for the RME Octapre.
http://www.synthax.de/rmemicocta.html
http://www.rme-audio.com/english/micpreamps/octamic.htm#OCTAMICD
and for the price search at Thomann:
www.Thomann.de


chrissugar
 
Now this is hilarious. :grin:
That Bergenbier AD converter has such a big success that the thread is at page 14 and here not a single word.
I thought after this post people will throw out on the window the ADA8000 and run out to buy all the RME modules. :grin:
Sorry, I was wrong. :oops:

chrissugar
 
Don't forget why units like the ADA80000 and the Ai3 are so popular.

:roll:

... ease of use and connection to an existing system.
Word clock is all very well BUT it doesn't fit everyones situation.
192k really doesn't have anything to do with Adat Lightpipe.

SMpro is another simple choice for a DIY unit
http://www.onlinerock.com/mf_store/brands/s/SMPro_Audio/SMPro_Audio_PR-8_MKII_ADAT_Option_240161.htm
BUT no lightpipe return to clock too !!


IF you are adding a Lightpipe box to a 001 , 002 or even an HD96IO then the B unit (ADA80000) or the A unit (Ai3) offer a simple slave that is very well behaved.
AND cheaper that I can make it for.

http://www.audient.co.uk/
Audient too has an 8 Mic unit with word clock ... again no Lightpipe return/loop to clock to so must be master.

Tascam Digital desks and 02R's have the Lightpipe option.
BUT in a multiple setup things can go wrong even with clock distribution as the Opto rec and send chips often don't external sync well ... they seem to chase Lightpipe better.

:shock: ... :roll:
sorry
looks like Kev is in rave mode


LOOK at the Wavefront web page for many of the details and facts about what and how Lightpipe works.

http://www.wavefrontsemi.com/
http://www.wavefrontsemi.com/products.html ... read all the extra documents !

http://www.profusionplc.com/ to purchase these chips

Just because you have word clock doesn't mean the problems are solved.

Crystal Labs have some chips that may offer more or better features but not that I have seen work ... yet
http://www.cirrus.com/en/products/
??? is that the right site ?? looks different

A good discussion over at the Recpit and some arguing over the merits of 192k ... fascinating stuff over at PSW in Dan Lavry's forum
http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/t/2133/0
and many others
like word clock
http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/t/2133/0
this has a direct bearing on how the unit performs in a chase mode

... all too complicated to for a simple Lightpipe interface question ... especially when it is for a unit at the bottom of the food chain.

Being an early ADAT user and multiple ADAT owner with BRC I did always have ADAT Lightpipe in constant use. Korg1212 and ADAT bridge and Ai3 and ADA80000 .... and a few synths


The only multiple unit I every got reliably working in a three way link up was the ....
Digi ADAT bridge (Protools)
Opcode Studio 64 XTC
Alesis BRC
Alesis XT
Alesis XT
couple of Digi 888/24

it took multiple lightpipe cables ... word clock Dig Super Clock and simple sync cable to BRC with the 9pin sync loop back through the ADATs

:shock:

In any system greater than 2 units in a digital link up that includes lightpipe ... LOOK OUT it's not that simple to just add word clock.
Generally I think interconnecting this stuff via analog yealds better long term results.
For the simple systems ...
Lightpipe in and out is the key.
Multiple slave units all indepenadntly chasing Lightpipe sync is the go and then use analog to inter connect.


shut up Kev


:shock:

nah ..... **** it :green:

One of the popular Lightpipe units has the TL074 chip at both the input and the output. This TL074 could have great bearing on both sound and ultimate signal to noise ratio. It might also be interesting to know what operating level the AD and DA chips run at and how companies chose to apply this to the outside world.

I think this is where Alesis made some choices and ended up at lower that what many of you would call pro. ... -14 or -13dB or there abouts.


The B boys did givbe 24dBu interfacing and this can be handy when doing straight analog transfers where there is no trim adjustment available.


side step
another relatively unknown converter from :
Digital Audio Denmark ADDA 2402 24-bit Audio Converter
they don't tell the whole story in their brochure but they do go a bit deeper that some
http://www.digitalaudio.dk/reviews/adda_2402/audiomedia.PDF

A/D conversion is 24-bit, and the resolution can be decreased to 20, 18 or 16 bits by adding psychoacoustic dither. This is done by implementing the algorithms and coefficients derived in Robert Wannamaker's Psychoacoustically Optimum Dither AES paper, which a friend of mine who designs converters read when it came out and described as a mathematical nightmare. This advanced dither feature is ‘free' with the CS5397 — fortunately there are talented individuals who are able to transform advanced psychoacoustic research into silicon, and manufacturers who are willing to implement it, as it adds a great deal to the 2402's capabilities.


Robert Wannamaker's Psychoacoustically Optimum Dither AES paper ...
No I haven't read it and had no idea it existed.

bottom line is
... now I have no idea whether to describe this unit as 24 bit, 20bit ,18 bit or 16 bit.

but the Crystal Semiconductor CS5397 does support 96k 24bit.

what other features are lurking inside these chips and do manufacturers make use if them ?

All of this and the original point to a DIY lightpipe unit may have been to get more inputs for say, drums into a 002 or similar.


there are many possibilities and I have more I could say
but I'll shut up now

enjoy
:cool:
 
while were on the topic of rme, ad8000 and wordclock....

ive got a rme 96/52 soundcard with daughter card, which is 3 adat in/out and bnc in/out and built-in wordclock.

wordclock is also on the ad8000, so should i used the rme sound card, ad8000, or buy another wordclock for my master clock?
which one is best and why?

thx.
 
Hey Kev

I forgot to mention that I don't buy the 192K thing, I'm in the Dan Lavry/Paul Fridle team with this, for a long time, and even now sometimes I'm selective with the projects I do at 96k, mostly classical acoustic. (by the way Dan's and Paul's posts are my favorite ones at Prosoundweb)
I just wrote what RME advertise because people complained about the B box doing only 48k. I think 96K is a good thing.

Yes Kev, I knew about the SMPro, it was mentioned before and it is cheap but it has only ADAT, the RME has also AES-EBU for all the 8 channels, and high sample rate will work with AES. The wordclock is very good if you use the AES outs.
Also you asume that most of people have ADAT connection but I think lots of them have also/only AES.
I don't see this as an addon to a Yamaha mixer, but a good solution for those who own a soundcard without analog ins like the RME Hammerfall DSP and others.

I already read the Wavefront docs and some others related to ADAT.
As I said before the wordclock is a necessary thing for AES connection, and this module has the AES. AES for this price? If you find another board with AES and ADAT and high sample rate at this price please inform me.

In my opinion the fact that the B box for the same price has already a box, connections and a PSU is not an advantage. I think it is a diference of class between the two and the RME alows you to make a DIY project from start, not trying to fix something.

chrissugar
 
hi,

Digital Audio Denmark ADDA 2402 24-bit Audio Converter is awesome. Only beaten by a Prism in my book. The Prism is MUCH more expensive. It is on my shopping list if I can't aford the Prism.

Blah,

Andy P
 
hi guys, I'll weigh in here...

first of all, asm, I have the rme 9652, the original one, not the HDSP, and I also have two ADA8000s and a tascam DM24 digital mixer. I use lightpipe for sync on everything and never have any problems.

The only minor issue I have is the fact that the DM-24 likes to notify me whenever the sample rate changes when it's on external sync, and I have to manually respond to it and flip it from 44,1 to 48k or whatever... Nuendo likes to jump samplerates around a lot, which makes the card change, and if I'm using the card as master, then I have to constantly babysit the mixer's sync. That said, I am moving away from using the mixer these days, as I'm trying to portablize my studio, and having the two ADA8K boxes is very convenient, I let the card be master and they sync right off their ADAT return cable.

Now, what I would really like to have is the option to do 96k, as I understand it you have to do some sort of bitsplitting mess to carry 96k over ADAT, and that you end up with 4 channels per pipe. I dunno that I'd use it all the time, as I really like having 24 channels available, but it'd be nice to be able to do 12 channels of 96k for more delicate work.

We've danced around this issue a lot in the past, but how close are we to designing a nice DIY 4 * 24/96 A/D? I'd love if we could build something pretty much exactly like the ADA8K box, only 4 ins, 4 outs, ADAT in and out, and 96k all the way.
 
[quote author="asm"]which one is best and why?[/quote]

need the exact configuration
and even so I obviously haven't been in front of your exact situation so is impossible to know for sure.

.. 3 adat in/out and bnc in/out and built-in wordclock ...

with one ADA80000 I'd be tempted to start with just two Lightpipes ... that will give the loop and have the ADA8000 in slave to the rme 96/52 soundcard with daughter card in control from the host software.

Now you will ask the question ... will the rme 96/52 sound better with an external like the Big Ben ?
Perhaps .. but only you can decide and it will need to add to the system without upsetting things.

Even before you add the External Clock you could try a clock lead from Card to ADA8000 ....
Will the ADA8000 still be happy ... perhaps but I don't think it will be better.

HERE IS THE RUB.

add the second ADA8000 to a second Lightpipe port. The unit in total slave mode will probably work fine as both will chase Lightpipe independent of each other.

Add the Big Ben to the sound card and things may still be fine ... but Big Ben to both ADA's and things may go very wrong.

These things need to be checked. Don't just assume all clocks will get resolved.


Chris

it's all good
and I did figure that you already had the WaveFront documents and that you were in the in the Dan Lavry/Paul Fridle thread. I said most of that for the other readers. Devil's Advocate stuff.

the RME has also AES-EBU for all the 8 channels, and high sample rate will work with AES. The wordclock is very good if you use the AES outs.

YEP

To DIY a serious unit and give a great deal of time to a design ... it must include AES.
4 channels of 96k on ADAT is not yet a standard and may never be.
SO
I think the cheap units offer great value for money for increasing the number of inputs and outputs to the


If you find another board with AES and ADAT and high sample rate at this price please inform me.

YEP
not yet ... or at least not one we can buy at a worthwhile DIY price.

In my opinion the fact that the B box for the same price has already a box, connections and a PSU is not an advantage. I think it is a difference of class between the two and the RME allows you to make a DIY project from start, not trying to fix something.

What is so wrong with the B unit ?
... err which RME unit ?
Does the RME use the WaveFront chips ?


[quote author="strangeandbouncy"] Digital Audio Denmark ADDA 2402 24-bit Audio Converter is awesome. Only beaten by a Prism in my book. The Prism is MUCH more expensive. It is on my shopping list if I can't aford the Prism. [/quote]

YEP
... the reason I brought that one up was more about the secret stuff inside the chips.
What else is lurking around inside chips that manufacturers either use or not use ...and how would we know without looking very deep inside.


[quote author="tmbg"] ... and I also have two ADA8000s and a tascam DM24 digital mixer. I use lightpipe for sync on everything and never have any problems. [/quote]

Yeah .. that external sync thing ... when using a 001 it just doesn't work and you have to set the DM to internal and have PT/001 in slave mode ...
NOW
you can't record into the 001 via spdf from an ISA430 ... it doesn't have a usable clock input ??

Back to the DM24.
The internal Adat card works well BUT the TDIF to ADAT external box has a word clock output and when you try to use both ... or three Lightpipe streams it all gets flakey !!


:shock:
phiew ???
 
yeah, that was something I was worried about... Originally my plan was to get a TDIF-ADAT converter box so I could actually use all 16 live channels on the DM24 for recording independently as opposed to just bussing to 8 channels, but I couldnt ever find one at a reasonable price.

Fortunately the B boxes came along and made my life easier. Now I don't have to drag that monstrous DM24 to remote sessions :)
 
(side topic)
just found this thread...
and i just love it when Kev is in hypermode :thumb:

Great post geezer, thanks! :guinness:

btw more reading and pics on those nice Danes:

http://www.sydec.be/Products/Details/ID/fd5d4206-2d96-45c8-b83d-347b3fb1b8d4/ADDA+2408-R/

Tony
 
Ha!
Nice thread for a couple of questions that spook round my head right now!
I recently purchased a couple of adat soundcards at a VERY low budget and i think they're very fine for building up a quality daw (i.e. 2x Sonorus StudI/O that can be synced thru a direct bus with one of them having a Wordclock/ADAT timecode module, these do have s/mux for 96khz mode, you surely can guess why :grin: :wink: which i wanna use for the main daw and one Steinberg VSL-2020 i plan to use as an effects engine or mobile recording card optionally in a mobile rack computer).
Plenty of adat interfaces though(main daw 4x adat IO, rack daw 2x adatIO and one wordclock I/O per computer) for under 200 bucks...
First i thought of just buying ada-8000s step by step and be happy...
But since i plan to actually USE all the GDIY pre and comp projects really in production :grin: i'm after some high end options for mastering purposes.
And since i'm seeming to be on budget forever looked into ad da diy projects here and elsewhere...
i stumbled upon the sm pro audio adat option card and actually i'm considering syncing problems appearing...
so my questions:
1. does anybody know the quality of the sonorus clock? (the possibilities with the sonorus card read amazing, like transparent samplereate conversion and advanced syncing possibilities to and from nearly everything going in or out, even spdif...so i consider this one to be the worthiest master clock of my cheapies...)
2. i heard that the ada-8000 gains alot of quality sync'd with a good master clock, can someone confirm this?

and now to diy really:

3. the ready-built sm pro A08 only has unbalanced -10dB ins, is there enough space in the box to add a direct balanced option via stereo rca additionally to the pad/balancing ckt? (the converter itself is natively balanced, right? :grin: ) This box costs just 40? more than the blank option card btw.

4. An additional quality DA circuit seems to be easy to diy, there are lots of sophisticated projects already done by the hifi geeks (ok, mostly/only 44.1khz but seriously to consider anyway). These range from ss stuff with multiple TDA15xx devices up to tube da's! (everything here, look at this :shock: http://www.jogis-roehrenbude.de/Leserbriefe/CD-Player-Projekt/CD.htm, sorry, 99% german language for explanation but pic's schem's pcb's and interesting links...
). One can interface with i2s or spdif with the "Mini-DAC 4xTDA1543", the design would be easy to tweak to other needs, the TDA15xx's are dead cheap, seem to sound good and are easy to obtain.
Would it be possible to combine something like this with something like mikkels (now functioning and tested some days ago!) adat receiver design from the apogee da thread ???

5.May this be of some use to run the sm pro unit in lightpipe slave mode (connecting the sm pro board's clocking in one box to such a diy da board? OK, maybe just for 44.1/48 khz but maybe interesting for us non 96khz guys?

Poooh, i hope i didn't messed up everything, my head is really brainstorming at the moment....

thanks in advance to everybody clearing up things a little bit

and happy diy to everyone

Martin :? :? :?
(just some diy thoughts...)
[/url]
 
[quote author="smallbutfine"]One can interface with i2s or spdif with the "Mini-DAC 4xTDA1543", the design would be easy to tweak to other needs, the TDA15xx's are dead cheap, seem to sound good and are easy to obtain.
Would it be possible to combine something like this with something like mikkels (now functioning and tested some days ago!) adat receiver design from the apogee da thread ??? [/quote]
Yes, you could easily interface the ADAT receiver with the 1543 DACs. Only one small change would be nescessary (the 1543 needs I2S, the AL1402 supplies left justified).

I have some TDA1543 here somewhere, so I guess I could make a test... The 1543 can do up to 96kHz BTW, or even 192kHz with 48FS bit clock rather than the standard 64FS.

Best regards,

Mikkel C. Simonsen
 
Now that makes me really curios!!!! :shock: :grin:
CD diyers say the TDA15xx sound more "lively" than pcm's...
on my order list for next reichelt buy.
:cool:
thank you very much for the fast reply!


Martin

Btw: do you think one can even parallel more of the TDA1543 "piggybacking style???" to achieve better specs?
 
[quote author="smallbutfine"]Btw: do you think one can even parallel more of the TDA1543 "piggybacking style???" to achieve better specs?[/quote]
Like this? http://www.dddac.de/ma_dac21tower.htm :grin:

Best regards,

Mikkel C. Simonsen
 
Back
Top