- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 513
Yes, after all, "real" communism hasn't been tried yet. [/sarcasm]Why should we discuss new ideas when perfection has already been achieved?
View attachment 106796
View attachment 106797
Infowars
Why should we discuss new ideas when perfection has already been achieved?
View attachment 106796
View attachment 106797
Infowars
I agree, maybe you missed the sarcasm. But I don't see how that negates trying to improve on the state of many cities.Perfection is having good neighbors, but also enough property and/or trees that you can't see their houses. Urban life is for ants. IMO.
What does communism have to do with more pedestrian friendly city planning? Rent free.Yes, after all, "real" communism hasn't been tried yet. [/sarcasm]
I didn't miss the sarcasm. Having spent 27 years living in and/or commuting into Silicon Valley I have some experience with the problems. People piled on top of each other and crammed cheek to jowl doesn't leave much room for improvement. It's never going to be "good" much less great. And now the city dwellers want their energy demands to be met by converting rural spaces into ugly wind and solar farms. Not an improvement.I agree. But I don't see how that negates trying to improve on the state of many cities.
What does communism have to do with more pedestrian friendly city planning? Rent free.
Also, is that all there is to it?What does communism have to do with more pedestrian friendly city planning? Rent free.
No, that was a double entendre you didn't get. You still didn't explain what a city planning aligned with walkability over cars has to do with communism.Also, is that all there is to it?
over the top central planning is a hallmark of communism. In the US, cities could use a little more law and order.No, that was a double entendre you didn't get. You still didn't explain what a city planning aligned with walkability over cars has to do with communism.
The tenets that all these people promoting 15 minute cities and "you'll own nothing and be happy" are entirely predicated on communism.No, that was a double entendre you didn't get. You still didn't explain what a city planning aligned with walkability over cars has to do with communism.
If you are referring to the tall buildings in the pictures Volker posted, the style of architecture has nothing to do with communism. It happens that it was also adopted by communist countries.over the top central planning is a hallmark of communism. In the US, cities could use a little more law and order.
Paris, Amsterdam, Oslo, Barcelona, Basel, famous hotspots of communism in the 21st century.The tenets that all these people promoting 15 minute cities and "you'll own nothing and be happy" are entirely predicated on communism.
Zoning laws, central planning and guidelines have always been there for any city. Rethinking old concepts and focussing on a less car-centric environment doesn't make this all of a sudden communist.over the top central planning is a hallmark of communism. In the US, cities could use a little more law and order.
I'd state it much more generally: central planning is the hallmark of authoritarian/collectivist societies. Communism is but one example. The NAZIs did a lot of it. FDR moved the US fed gov that direction in significant ways.over the top central planning is a hallmark of communism.
Civil societies require some form of this. The anonymity provided by large cities makes it both more difficult to implement and enables the bad behavior. It is an unhealthy environment for many people (and I'm not talking about air quality).In the US, cities could use a little more law and order.
I think he was simply referring to the implications of re-imagining cities (to be pedestrian friendly or whatever some "authority" decides is best for "everyone").If you are referring to the tall buildings in the pictures Volker posted, the style of architecture has nothing to do with communism. It happens that it was also adopted by communist countries.
Yes, the loss of anything artistic in 99% of large scale architecture in the past 75 years is sad. And the skill of the builders (stonemasons, etc.) is apparent in these old edifices. The worst examples of bland, repetitive, concrete brutalism I've personally seen were in South Korean cities. But the Santa Cruz County offices and court buildings in Santa Cruz, California are right up there in the dehumanized structure awards.Here we call them tower blocks. Of course total abomination. Beautiful and healthier buildings were demolished to make way for them. Criminal. Some city planners have a lot to answer. Lucky to them that most of them are dead now.
I've always been a country boy. While I enjoy good architecture, none of it tops a natural scene.I`d take what AnalogPackrat posted any time.
Communism promises a lot but delivers very little. Perhaps study some more history before embracing that.I've been living in a city where you have to drive literally everywhere for the last 7 years. I'm so annoyed and over it, I just bought a condo in my hometown Chicago and I'm never looking back. If I do move somewhere again, it will be somewhere I can walk or bike to all my destinations. Cars are for the birds. My uncle died on the highway just last December driving. Green space is great too! But It's personally just not my way of life. Unless of course I could walk or bike to a downtown area and have an artist community, a pub, a cafe, a library, etc. If that's communist, then we need more lol. Besides, ideal communist would provide a social safety net that could help people that are in need all over the city. We simply aren't chickens.
When was there communism when they wasn't embargoes, U.S. backed coups, totalitarian rule that backed the communist style economy (often to protect it from outside aggression, etc? Communism at it's core threatens the ruling class of all countries all over the world and they're the ruling class for a reason, they're not going to let that stand. At this point in history we've never seen true communism at a large scale and only little glimpses of it. I've studied lots of history, and lots of economics in college.Communism promises a lot but delivers very little. Perhaps study some more history before embracing that.
JR
I'm guessing thats what you were taught in college (USA and capitalism bad)? History is littered with failed communist nations.When was there communism when they wasn't embargoes, U.S. backed coups, totalitarian rule that backed the communist style economy (often to protect it from outside aggression, etc? Communism at it's core threatens the ruling class of all countries all over the world and they're the ruling class for a reason, they're not going to let that stand. At this point in history we've never seen true communism at a large scale and only little glimpses of it. I've studied lots of history, and lots of economics in college.
There is plenty of city space to be used for solar panels. Rooftops, facades, parking lots etc.And now the city dwellers want their energy demands to be met by converting rural spaces into ugly wind and solar farms.
Paris is a 15 minute city?Paris, Amsterdam, Oslo, Barcelona, Basel, famous hotspots of communism in the 21st century.
sorry, take care and be well...I can't do this with you. If we are in the same place and you want to have a beer over it sometime, I'm game. But it's taxing to my mental health to sit on here and take unnecessary little snarky comments.
But I would like to recommend to you the Red Menace podcast. It's on spotify and here:
Enter your email address to join: