I am finding that I am begining to become a LD capsule snob. I am finding that except for one china capsule maker I am not liking the other china made LD capsules. I guess once you hear something good your ear/brain notes the difference.
The other capsules can sound good until you place microphones side by side and compare.
When I read at other sites about people writing how great a microphone is I often wonder if they are deaf or never heard a good microphone.
The electronics are a small challange compared to the capsule.
What is interesting is that both 3 and 6 micron capsules can sound very good so diaphram thickness might not be as important as some people believe. I think it is more the overall design
I have not given up on working on the capsules I am still tring to understand what could make a capsule better.
Modded china microphones can be good but you need a good capsule to get it to world class.
I have not heard a J.P. built china capsule. If they are better than the stock china capsules it might be in the skinning and or washer(s) thickness.
A point from this post I guess I am trying to get across. Don't be cheap with the capsule if you are building a microphone G7 etc. It might be good to buy a real neumann,MBHO or blue. If you are going to spend all that time making a tube microphone give it a good capsule. You take some of the circuit posted at the lab it can be world class. I like MBHO capsules and neuamnns I have not spent any time with a blue capsule. I might have to buy a blue M49 type to try for a u47 type microphone.
I will not build any microphone based on the Oktava 219/319 capsule I think that is just a waste of time.
I have not even started to get serious with SD because I have two Ni skinned gefells and the Ni skinned capsules are great compared to PET IMO.
Must buy KM53 KM54 ( said in Homer S voice)
The other capsules can sound good until you place microphones side by side and compare.
When I read at other sites about people writing how great a microphone is I often wonder if they are deaf or never heard a good microphone.
The electronics are a small challange compared to the capsule.
What is interesting is that both 3 and 6 micron capsules can sound very good so diaphram thickness might not be as important as some people believe. I think it is more the overall design
I have not given up on working on the capsules I am still tring to understand what could make a capsule better.
Modded china microphones can be good but you need a good capsule to get it to world class.
I have not heard a J.P. built china capsule. If they are better than the stock china capsules it might be in the skinning and or washer(s) thickness.
A point from this post I guess I am trying to get across. Don't be cheap with the capsule if you are building a microphone G7 etc. It might be good to buy a real neumann,MBHO or blue. If you are going to spend all that time making a tube microphone give it a good capsule. You take some of the circuit posted at the lab it can be world class. I like MBHO capsules and neuamnns I have not spent any time with a blue capsule. I might have to buy a blue M49 type to try for a u47 type microphone.
I will not build any microphone based on the Oktava 219/319 capsule I think that is just a waste of time.
I have not even started to get serious with SD because I have two Ni skinned gefells and the Ni skinned capsules are great compared to PET IMO.
Must buy KM53 KM54 ( said in Homer S voice)