Cycling/Bikes

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
SSLtech said:
Excellent 'essentials' summary.

With the multiplayer software, yes you can race... even over the internet... though the power/resistance calibration can be "cheated" downwards, and I suspect that any sort of competition tends to incentivize cheating. -On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.
Coincidentally I was thinking of exactly this kind of stuff, but for treadmills (like 20 years ago). I'm sure that has been done by now... But I could imagine a bank of treadmills at the gym that are wired together so you can compete against other runners. While most people don't race on treadmills (at the gym).

One idea that I may still pursue for my treadmill is natural speed control. I figure something like the polaroid camera distance finder connected to the speed control of my treadmill so it will manage the speed of the belt to keep me in the middle of the treadmill. A cheaper approach is a string and a pot with lever on it. Another way, I though up is to put 4 load cells under the 4 corners and impute where I am on the belt by the front to back weight distribution (but this might be distorted by odd foot-falls).   
If you do get on a bike, one thing I'd say if you've got a dodgy knee is make very very certain indeed that your legs never quite fully extend... in other words, at lowest/furthest pedal travel your leg should never QUITE be straight. the knee should ALWAYS remain ever-so-slightly flexed. -Setting the saddle high enough to 'lock' your knee at full extension can do significant damage. -Not everyone knows this, though you probably already do.
No that is news to me, while I have seen the general advice to not have the leg fully extend, but that seems kind of obvious to be able to pedal without having to shift back and forth in the seat.

Coincidentally I did get a warning from the my orthopedic doctor about the range of motion on my weight machine when doing leg-extensions. I have already added one wood block to the machine to prevent angles tighter than 90' for that station, but the doctor wants no more than 45' from horizontal max. 90' leg-x hurt my knee so I need to modify it further.

====
Speaking of knee geometry, my friend the bike mechanic has suggested that lock-in cleat pedal/shoes are good for keeping the knees in optimal alignment and reduce joint stress.

-----

Good news I did a 5 mile roll (according to the built in display) on my air-dyne this morning and it is still as boring as I remember but my knee didn't seem to complain so I remain optimistic that I can pursue cycling...
 

Maybe I need to go to grappa and rent a bike, but I don't even want to sit on a carbon fiber bike. I might like it.

JR
 
Here's how I get to work most of the summer - about 4 miles each way, but on nice days I'll take the scenic route to add some miles.

 

Attachments

  • Recumbent.jpg
    Recumbent.jpg
    268.2 KB · Views: 6
> -Setting the saddle high enough to 'lock' your knee at full extension can do significant damage.
> -Not everyone knows this, though you probably already do.


I learned. Too-tall gear and too-high seat can cause lifetime damage in a teen. Not crippling (yet), but annoying. In a way-over-20 person already gimping, aggravation could be swift.
 
I'm not a "gun person" -as I'm sure many can guess- but the one time I did hold a pistol in my hand (a colleague back in the UK was handing it in for the buy-back after the Dunblaine massacre) it was a fascinating experience. -NOT because of any sense of what it could "do", but because of the appreciation of the level of solid and absolute precision with which it was made. -The parts moved with such exactitude, without slip or slack. -The finish alone testified to an expensive process. The tactile experience was unexpectedly astonishing, and I can fully see how it can 'seduce' (specially in combination with how its use can be seen as dramatically changing the 'power' of a situation... but I digress).

It's also like those do a certain mindset can appreciate the difference between a K-mart socket wrench, and a Snap-On socket wrench. While BOTH will essentially do the exact same job, and it's the MECHANIC who really means the difference between a good job and a bad one, not the tool... There's a certain tactile or sensory pleasure from using the REAL thing.

A well-adjusted carbon bike -yes, even the off-road bikes are made in carbon now- has the power to seduce those who are inclined to notice and appreciate when they're holding a tool of quality and distinction... -Yes, I got suckered. -but I still love it.

I have to say that my son's bike is astonishing from a tactile point of view. -This weekend, up in Tallahassee he FINALLY managed to beat his long-time rival (he's finished second about nine times to him, usually about 30 seconds back, but once getting as close as 2.6 sec.) and looking at the split times, the bike sector was where about two-thirds of the damage was done. -The other fella I think gassed himself trying to keep him from opening up too much of a gap, instead of trying to reel him in on the run, where I think he might have stood a better chance...

But then my son has a 13.5lb bike, (including a set of extremely light wheels, which makes sprint acceleration very striking indeed) and he actually accelerates faster than I can keep up with him... (the little bastard!) -I have to watch for him on the sprints, which he has a habit of calling out when he's already got a run on me!

I had a really rewarding time changing the bike to fit him. -I switched the crankset for a 162.5mm set (they're usually 170mm or so) and from a 53/39 tooth chainring set to a 50-34. -His little legs don't need to be struggling to spin through the larger circle (knees!) and making the lever length shorter means that it's better to reduce the gearing. Replacing the bottom bracket (bearing set inside the frame that the crank shaft passes through) was a VERY enjoyable experience... It's just so lovely to work on precision-fit stuff like that... and it means using very carefully-machined tools, which is rewarding in its own way also.
 
Oh, I mentioned eariler that my son was competing in the state qualifier for the national kids' triathlon championships, but I never posted any updates:

He did indeed qualify for the nationals, so at the end of August I'll be driving the bikes up to Des Moines. (ROAD TRIP!) -Should be fun. -I'm sure he won't have much of a chance, but I don't suppose he'll finish last, either.
 
For my intentions a lighter weight bike will have to be pedaled further to get the same work out. I am trying to support my eating and drinking habit. Not race or even go too fast. ;D

I am not a tool or gun snob, but bought a craftsmen tool set as a kid...I have even had craftsmen tools break or wear out after decades of use.. Tools can be too cheap to work right.

  I never felt like the M-16 was an example of high precision, while I expect it was precise enough to work... despite double feeding and jamming on the rifle range... :eek: The design included a forward assist lever to manually advance the bolt if the gas assist was inadequate (like from a mis-fire?). That just made a double feed jam even tighter and harder to clear.  :'(

I believe personal firearms are not an area to go budget, nor talk too much about. Speak softly, etc.  8)

JR
 
Have you see these, John? Could be a compromise between running and cycling - with the added bonus of seeing people's faces when they think 'what the **** is that?'
 
thermionic said:
Have you see these, John? Could be a compromise between running and cycling - with the added bonus of seeing people's faces when they think 'what the **** is that?'

I have never seen one in person... I an vaguely aware of the concept, I think there may even be antique versions of the technology.

Stationary elliptical machines are supposed to be easy on the joints, but so are normal bikes.

=====
Yesterday I modified my weight machine, so the leg extension station would limit the range of knee joint angle. My ortho advised against too tight of a knee angle when lifting. I now stop the weight bar at about 60' from horizontal but even that is too much bend. With a light weight setting, I can feel a rough spot or catch in my knee joint at about 45' from horizontal. I may need to just avoid that one exercise entirely, or stick to only light weights. I did determine the hard way before the full range of motion and heavier weight leg extensions aggravates my knee arthritis.  :'(

----

Today I will try for 10 miles (indicated) on my stationary bike... it will bore me silly but confirm that my knee can bike.

Here is a video of a friend's not boring bike commute.  http://youtu.be/3eXbtZ1uixY

JR   
 
Nice video. I just got one of those small Go-Pro competitors (actually straight-swapped it for a set of bolt-on Aero handlebars which came with an older bike, which I never used, and couldn't sell) and will probably start recording rides from now on, for the same reason that I've been recording all of my drives using an automatic DashCam for a little over a year now.

I noticed that Garmin have made a camera which also links to your ANT+ sensors and GPS file, to provide a burn-in of map route, location along that route, speed (mph), heart rate (bpm), cadence (rpm) and power output (Watts)... Looks like Shimano have just released a competitive device, so that might create a little competition.

A friend has just started using his... posted a video online:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-kTnErYWpA

Looks like he started and stopped it a few times, hence the subsequently-computed route in the upper-right-corner is discontinuous, and he doesn't have a power sensor paired, so no Wattage displayed, but everything else looks like it's there...

 
> pistol ... appreciation of the level of solid and absolute precision with which it was made.

I've casually been around guns and gun factories.

IMHO, maybe like JR, the average gun is machined as poorly as possible and still get bought. My dad's 1940s Mossberg carbine feels very nice outside but has some real hasty/crude work inside. I perforated a lot of paper with that gun and it *does* work well. A **** of a lot better than this new bench-vice I just bought (however dad did use the Mossberg for potting crows and he may have worked the rough edges off).

But the standard military and personal weapons are low-bid. The bid samples work nicely, then when they get the contract they ramp-up the cutting speed to trim costs.

Then there are two branches. Boutique production which may be nicely finished all through (or maybe only on the surface); and throw-away pieces at insanely low price.

Getting off that subject: you sometimes find gorgeous machining inside cars/trucks. Gearboxes especially, cuz bad gears and forks will tear themselves apart in weeks. I just got a 1967 Ford 4500 tractor. There's some "good enuff" stampings, and some really wonderful parts.

Yeah, some high-price bike parts are machined by guys who get-off on beautiful parts as much as we do. But you also find some nice work on 1960s-1980s budget bikes, at least where it matters.
 
I appreciate learning about the guns thing... -The only one I've ever touched was striking and 'seductive' specifically in the sense of being a gorgeously-machined instrument. -I had extended that experience to assume that many or all guns might be that way, but it's probably still very like bikes, insofar as the rides that they sell at Target and Wal-Mart are low-bid, mass-produced and cheap, but the higher-cost items at specialist stores are an altogether different experience.

Craftsman ratchets; I've had a few fail. -Now the warranty seems to be more of a numbers game just to get the sales, rather than a declaration of quality. On the other hand, I've got a few Snap-On screwdrivers and ratchets. -They're almost invariably a different experience to handle and use. -While I can screw up a job with either of them, I do enjoy handling the better made tools while I'm over-torquing the head studs!  ;)

First bike I bought when I got back into cycling after a 20-something year break was a 1980's low/mid-market Specialized. 1986 Sirrus, to be specific. Downtube shifters, 6-cogs, steel frame, but well made. I gave it a halfway-decent makeover, about the only thing I didn't bother with was the brake and shifter cables, but they were working fine. -It cleaned up nicely, but it gave you the sense of being well-made and more than adequate for the task. -But it was no competition for the first full carbon frame I rode, and I stopped riding it as soon as I rode (and immediately bought) my Madone SuperLight. Mind you, I sold it for what I paid, and learned plenty about the changes since I'd last ridden, and what I should look for in a new bike.
 
SSLtech said:
I appreciate learning about the guns thing... -The only one I've ever touched was striking and 'seductive' specifically in the sense of being a gorgeously-machined instrument. -I had extended that experience to assume that many or all guns might be that way, but it's probably still very like bikes, insofar as the rides that they sell at Target and Wal-Mart are low-bid, mass-produced and cheap, but the higher-cost items at specialist stores are an altogether different experience.
Just like any product category there is a continuum of premium to cheap crap. For hand-guns the very cheapest category aka "saturday night specials", were legislated out of existence because of the strong association with violence and crime. Waiting periods and background checks attempts to filter out the people who try to buy a gun in anger with intentions of doing bodily harm.

Some people buy guns for personal protection and for them reliability is a concern, you don't want to have to worry about a weapon that might not fire when needed.

The category of gun owners that I do not understand, is the "boy's toys" segment. IMO the popularity if the AR-15 is purely because of the visual similarity to the M-16 military weapon. I had a roommate who owned an AR-15 back in the '70s and I thought it was silly since I was fresh out of the army and didn't look at weapons as something to play with.

Just for the record my criticism of the M-16 was more about design than build quality it looked like it was well manufactured but it never attracted the love and respect from soldiers at least back in the 60-70s when it replaced the M-14. While soldiers appreciated the lighter weight on long marches, that was about the only plus. What is the point of "rock and roll" (full automatic) with an 18 shot clip? Etc. it was popular practice to carry as many extra loaded clips as you could beg, borrow, or steal (in the field).  Braaap... new clip,, Braaap... new clip,  Braaaap.. new clip.... silence while you refill the clips. 

Craftsman ratchets; I've had a few fail. -Now the warranty seems to be more of a numbers game just to get the sales, rather than a declaration of quality. On the other hand, I've got a few Snap-On screwdrivers and ratchets. -They're almost invariably a different experience to handle and use. -While I can screw up a job with either of them, I do enjoy handling the better made tools while I'm over-torquing the head studs!  ;)
Yes, I saw that shift a few decades ago, back in the 50's /60's Craftsman was the real deal, then some sharp pencil types worked out the actuarial angles about what percentage would actually call them on the lifetime guarantee. When they made craftsman cheaper they left the door open for snap-on to occupy a premium space. Not clear who made more money over their lifetime but if anything craftsman is in decline now, not helped by the decline of Sears. 
First bike I bought when I got back into cycling after a 20-something year break was a 1980's low/mid-market Specialized. 1986 Sirrus, to be specific. Downtube shifters, 6-cogs, steel frame, but well made. I gave it a halfway-decent makeover, about the only thing I didn't bother with was the brake and shifter cables, but they were working fine. -It cleaned up nicely, but it gave you the sense of being well-made and more than adequate for the task. -But it was no competition for the first full carbon frame I rode, and I stopped riding it as soon as I rode (and immediately bought) my Madone SuperLight. Mind you, I sold it for what I paid, and learned plenty about the changes since I'd last ridden, and what I should look for in a new bike.
I saw a  26" bike with knobby tires at Walmart yesterday for $88... I kept shopping.  8)

JR
 

Attachments

  • image001-2.jpg
    image001-2.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 10
Well I broke down and bought a bike.

181221.jpg


I found one used at the closest bike shop (25 miles away) for a few hundred dollars.

I am still dialing it in and getting used to it. I had to adjust the seat post more than 2" higher, and I doubt I'll use all 21 speeds. It already has a comfy "old man" seat.

I took it out for one 3 mile ride yesterday, cut short by rain, and my knee did not give me any sharp pain, like it does after more stressful activity** but it did complain a little. I'll have to see if that reaction gets worse or quiets down after more and longer rides.  Three miles is not much of a test. 

We don't have bike trails or paved shoulders in rural MS so I need to stick to back roads and be alert.

JR

** I gave up my gym membership but they wanted me to show up and sign paperwork. Since I had to show up in person I figured I would play one last time. The good news is I won my last game ever, ;D bad news is I was limping for two days after that. :'(
 
 
Interesting frame... the crank is set forward from the base of the seat tube. The seat tube itself is also fairly reclined.

Likely more for comfort/cruising than any particularly hard exercise, since having the saddle so far rear of a plumb line through the crank means that if you start to push hard, you'll also push the butt backwards... a wide saddle might limit rearward slippage, but also presses into the back of the legs, so definitely built for comfort. One significant advantage is that the 'standover' height is nice and low... no need to tippy-toe when stopped.

The 21-speed should be thought of as three 'ranges' of seven. -You don't usually do a lot of switching of the front chainrings at the crank... instead you usually pop it on the one that makes the seven cogs at the rear make sense... The tiny chainring is only really for climbing hills, the biggest chainring is good for descents, and the middle or large chain rings are the ones to go with on the flats.

With a knee to shepherd, 'harder' gears stress the joints... so if in doubt, or if you feel that one ratio is a little too high, but the next one along is a little too low, make the decision to go with the 'easier' gear and either spin up the pedaling slightly, or allow the bike to slow. -Don't try to 'make the work harder' and 'climb out of it' with the pedals... that puts a load on the knees that you should avoid.

But other than that, just get out and ride! I need to follow my own advice on that one...

My son is down in Miami this morning competing in another triathlon... I was SUPPOSED to be down there taking bikes and riding with him etc, but I managed to break a plastic coupling on my car which feeds vacuum to the brake servo... so now I have a huge vacuum leak and no brakes... -And that's the only one of my cars which fits a bike rack...
So my wife has taken his bike and him down, I'm just following it via text updates...
I feel stupiud for having borked the car, but the piece was just brittle after 120,000 miles, and it snapped in my hand. -I'll get the car trailered to the dealership later today, and they can fix it... -I shouldn't be allowed near the engine bay for a while, I think!
 
Yup, I think It's called a "foot forward" design or something like that... I am definitely in it for comfort not speed.  8) Yup I get it about the ranges.. Lowest range is fine for now. I don't want to be going too fast on these back roads and encounter car traffic.

I also had to re-center the wheels to stop the brakes from dragging. When I put the wheels back on after carrying it home, I was not aware of the importance of centering.

I did experience some mild knee pain about a day after riding, but I will give it a few more tries next week. Hopefully it will quiet down. 

While I was at the bike store I picked up some replacement pedals for me neighbor's grandson's bike, that had one broken pedal. I was having a way too hard time getting the new pedals on until I learned that the two pedals have alternate left-hand and right-hand screw threads. I did not remove the broken left-hand pedal and the right side was normal so I was trying to attach the left hand pedal using right hand action. I had a 50-50 chance of picking the correct pedal for each side but was not lucky there either.

For any still reading along this far, the left side pedal is marked with a bunch of small lines to tell it from the right side.

JR

 
Ah yes...

I managed to kill the engine on my Audi this weekend... (plastic vacuum hard-line 'manifold'-cluster which feeds the brake servo etc. -I was attempting to replace with the correct new part, but a hose-barb broke off the block manifold... also plastic.) and so it had to be trailered to the dealership.

To get it ready for winching onto the trailer, I pulled the towing eye out of its storage slot in the trunk. -I popped off the front bumper cover. -Then I spent quite a while trying to screw it in, before realizing that it was a left hand thread!

Like a USB connector -the flat one, I think it's called the 'A' version. -There's a 50-50 chance of plugging it in the right way, but the occasion of the first attempt being wrong is invariably 75% or greater!

By the way, that DIY vacuum line repair, which I thought would save me some money? -I just got a call asking for permission to proceed with the repair. -$700.
 
Just came across this thread, here are my bikes, the daily runner first.  I used to get 20 miles a day on this but I'm down to ten now due to a change of job :(


I run it freewheel but it's got a flip flop hub.  Tried the fixed gear thing for one ride and realised there are better ways to kill myself.  Way too long in the tooth to relearn how to ride a bike.  I do love the single speed though, it's simplicity itself, get on it and ride.

Now, the full carbon race bike, a few years old now but it's in good nick, I've put some miles away on this.  Giant TCR Advanced 2 2010.  105 and Ultegra.


 
> go with the 'easier' gear

+2 (+1 for each knee).

> Interesting frame...

Indeed. They call it "Flat Foot Technology(R)". http://www.electrabike.com/bikes/townie

> re-center the wheels to stop the brakes from dragging

They don't give brake details. But in general, you set the axle *solid* in the fork and frame; the nuts won't hold it over bumps. Derailers traditionally have a hanger which upsets the rear; also wheel-dish and frame offset. Get the front of the tire in-line with the seatpost within a few mm, it is fine.

Then there is some other way to center the brakes around the rims. On center-bolt side-pull, you slightly-slack the back nut then whack the back bracket. Center-pull brakes, you can slide the center-pull left/right a bit. Fancy models will have stop-screws so you can set freeplay the same both sides.

I do not have to tell you that if the brake drags it should drag evenly all around. Cars, you cut the drum/disk to get this. Bikes you screw the spokes until it is plane or you collapse the wheel. For what you paid, there should be a 28-day tune-up where their mech will straighten the wheel if you ask. You prolly want to get the spoke-wrench, because you can do better in an idle hour than the shop guy will in 5 minutes.

Considering the "lazy" frame and your un-demanding riding, I'd get the rear brake working crisp and let the front brake be slacker. (Vice-versa on a hunch-over bike and high speeds.)
 
PRR said:
> go with the 'easier' gear

+2 (+1 for each knee).

> Interesting frame...

Indeed. They call it "Flat Foot Technology(R)". http://www.electrabike.com/bikes/townie

> re-center the wheels to stop the brakes from dragging

They don't give brake details. But in general, you set the axle *solid* in the fork and frame; the nuts won't hold it over bumps. Derailers traditionally have a hanger which upsets the rear; also wheel-dish and frame offset. Get the front of the tire in-line with the seatpost within a few mm, it is fine.

Then there is some other way to center the brakes around the rims. On center-bolt side-pull, you slightly-slack the back nut then whack the back bracket. Center-pull brakes, you can slide the center-pull left/right a bit. Fancy models will have stop-screws so you can set freeplay the same both sides.
The bike was checked out by the shop before I got it. I removed the wheels to fit it inside my car. When I put the wheels back on I apparently did not pay enough attention to centering them.
I do not have to tell you that if the brake drags it should drag evenly all around. Cars, you cut the drum/disk to get this. Bikes you screw the spokes until it is plane or you collapse the wheel. For what you paid, there should be a 28-day tune-up where their mech will straighten the wheel if you ask. You prolly want to get the spoke-wrench, because you can do better in an idle hour than the shop guy will in 5 minutes.
The brakes (both wheels)  were dragging but just on one side and evenly as far as I can tell. All better now, since I dialed it in...
Considering the "lazy" frame and your un-demanding riding, I'd get the rear brake working crisp and let the front brake be slacker. (Vice-versa on a hunch-over bike and high speeds.)
Both work fine now.

Yesterday I took it for a 5-6 mile ride with plenty of hills. Got an OK work-out and even with the wide seat I was ready for the ride to be over at the end. I kept it in the lowest front sprocket and just coasted when going too fast to pedal in 7th gear. The good news is that my knee seems to tolerate the bike (knock on wood)... The knee is making new different noises when I walk, but no new pain. Getting old sucks, but is better than the alternative. :D

JR

PS: I may take a look at shifter alignment, it is a little uncertain about catching 2nd gear. The higher gears are stable so not sure what is off. Maybe lower gears are more sensitive to alignment
 
Jim50Hz, Nice bikes.

I've avoided the 'fixie'/single-speed thing, though working at a university, and with a thriving local 'hipster' population, the bike racks are FULL of them.

The Giant looks nice. -Another local shop is a dealer, and they seem to be priced very well indeed... not to mention they do quite a bit of sub-contract manufacture for other name brands, so they're more pervasive than most people realize.

John,

Rear derailleur (shifter) alignment: There are bunches of YouTube videos on the subject, but before fiddling, and getting the 'feel' of what's a "big adjustment" versus a "small tweak", make sure that you learn about the two limit screws do... in particular the screw which limits the travel of the derailleur INWARDS (towards the spokes). Once those limit screws are set (and they not always are) then you should never need to touch them again, but the inward travel limit is critically important to set FIRST in my experience, because if it allows too much inward travel, then future cable tensioning experiments can drag the chain "past" the big cog, where it drops down between the cog and the spokes... chewing up the spokes if the bike is in motion. (freewheeling won't help you, if the spokes are moving, they're grinding against the chain!) -So SET THAT FIRST.

Other than the two limit screws (which there's typically no reason to ever mess with, once correctly set) then there's only two other adjustments: cable tension (where the pulleys sit in relation to each gear with the indexed "clicks") -which is the most common thing to adjust, and back-tension. (leave this one well alone for now... it's easier to mess up than set right, until you're familiar with regular use. -Again, there are plenty of "instructible" videos out there, some done by people with better understanding than others, and some done by people with better ability to communicate their understanding than others. -Certainly, you can probably assess both skills for yourself.

Be aware that staying in the smallest chain ring at the front means that the smallest cogs at the rear will probably result in a little 'chatter'... Viewed from above, when the chain is in the middle ring at the front, it's only asked to "bend" a little bit to "reach" all seven cogs at the rear... -the chain should be more or less straight and "unbending" when on the 4th (middle) cog, and in the middle front ring... and in the smallest front ring, the chain is probably pretty straight on let's say the second-largest rear cog... but if you shift all the way to the smallest rear cog, the chain links are asked to "bend" at the most severe angle as they leave the front ring, and then "bend back" as they engage with the cog at the back.

-Bear in mind that when I say "bend" here, I mean "deflect" or "deviate"... they don't actually 'bend' in terms of the metal in the chain links truly bending!

Anyhow, having the chain all the way to the left at the front (small ring) and all the way to the right at the back (small cog) is known as "cross-chaining", and is acceptable, but not ideal. -If you find that you're spending ALL your time in that combo, -or most of it- then you should shift up to the middle ring, when a similar (if not essentially identical) ratio can probably be achieved by stepping the rear cog up towards the middle. -Likewise, using the chain ring at the front all the way to the right (the big ring) when coupled with the cog all the way to the left at the rear (the low speed cog) is also an example of "cross-chaining", and it's fine for brief spells if you're using the large ring because you're zipping round everywhere... but similarly, if you find yourself spending all day in that combo, it's time to consider a spell on the middle chain ring, mated to a smaller rear cog.

Also, chain clatter noise can come from the front derailleur guide. -Since it acts on the "tight" side of the chain (not the "slack side, as does the rear derailleur) then there is no way to use a jockey wheel, so it has to form a narrow 'gate' through which the chain passes. -Its job is to forcibly "drag" the chain over to the next ring when you need to shift, but to then sit in a position which -ideally- doesn't 'rub' against the chain sides... This is often a 'compromise' since the 'deflection' of the chain as you switch rear cogs, and the chain 'bends' and changes path, often causes the chain to rub slightly, again most commonly at 'cross-chain' combinations.

DO NOT fiddle with any adjustments on the front derailleur. -Not until you're at least well familiar with other adjustments. Instead, you MIGHT find that your FRONT shifter controls (be they twist-grip, paddle-shift, or 'trigger and thumb-lever' types) may have small "in between" clicks among the main indexes... -If so, these are to allow you to "trim" the position of the front derailleur to quiet chain-rub during cross-chain combinations.

Anyhow, that's probably more than you need to know right now, but certainly, the rear shifting is generally just a matter adjusting of the cable tension. There should usually be one thumbscrew at the cable entry to the rear derailleur, and also one at the shifter end of the cable... they both do the same thing, so don't worry. -The difference is that you can only reach the shifter one when you're riding, so it's common for a shop-tech to 'center' the front one to allow for adjustment both ways, then to make the 'basis' adjustment at the rear thumbscrew, while the bike is on the stand.

Some bikes have plastic "spoke protector discs" (also known as "dork discs") to protect against spoke-grinding from misadjusted rear limit screws and over-adventurous thumbscrew-twiddling. some people remove them because they get dirty/cloudy/nasty looking. If you have one, do not remove it unless you've checked that the inner limit screw is set so that your chain CANNOT drop over towards the spokes.

My son actually managed third place in the Miami triathlon this weekend... first place was the national champion, so I'm inclined to let that slide... but he thinks he wants to up his training to see if he can claim that second place... -I'm game! :)
 
Back
Top