Diving deeper into microphone and impedance theory; Neutral Electron and the Metatronic Configuration in the Balanced Impedance Circuit, possible?

[OneRoomStudio]

This lecture is actually quite good, and accurate as far as I can tell (I didn’t listen to the whole thing). There doesn’t seem to be any mention of “metatrons” or anything like that at all. If something like that existed, don’t you think the people who were smart enough to discover subatomic particles and develop quantum physics would have mentioned it?

 

[gyraf]

I am going to answer this on the assumption that it is all asked in good faith and that OP is not just trolling.

Wow. That was a genuinely patient and well-thought-out explanation, outlining the content and implications of the question in a very precise but still kind way. Respect.

You a teacher by any chance?

/Jakob E.

 

[abbey road d enfer]

One must accept the fact that, although quantum physics and mathematics are very real, their effects are seldom apparent in everyday life, just like relativity.
Audio electronics and acoustics are quite pedestrian relatively.

 

[berret]

Wow. That was a genuinely patient and well-thought-out explanation, outlining the content and implications of the question in a very precise but still kind way. Respect.

You a teacher by any chance?

/Jakob E.

X2, Respect!

 

[Newmarket]

I am going to answer this on the assumption that it is all asked in good faith and that OP is not just trolling.

1. a previously unnoticed effect.

......
Not everyone agrees that loading a microphone with such a heavy load sounds "special." If the microphone is not transformer coupled (and sometimes when it is) that will generally introduce much higher distortion, and will cut the level in half (6dB), which usually results in 3dB to 6dB worse noise performance. That is why it is almost universally recommended to have a load impedance of at least 10x the microphone source impedance.
The results of loading a microphone with a low load impedance is relatively easy to explain with frequency response differences vs. load, and distortion spectrum. Lossless flow of energy and a quantum field of attraction around a neutral electron are not involved.

Agree with all that. Although tbh I'm not sure it was worth your time to write it all
And - yeah - some unfounded / confused comments about transducer impedance matching.

 

[ccaudle]

You a teacher by any chance?

Not by profession, but I have several children, so a bit by necessity.

 

[Philbo King]

Psychedics again? Maybe reduce the dose...

 

[s wave]

I agree that most of audio

One must accept the fact that, although quantum physics and mathematics are very real, their effects are seldom apparent in everyday life, just like relativity.
Audio electronics and acoustics are quite pedestrian relatively.

True ~ but I do believe that acoustics (sound-vibration theory) is one of the most complicated physics and has areas that should still be pioneered. I often heard talk in recording studios that all we need to worry about (of focus on) is the limit of what the human ear can hear up to around 20khz. I was often shunned when I suggested that this kind of perception may limit a potential artistic tool. Taking a 3D sound environ and translating that to an electrical circuit and played back in a 3D sound environment has many lil twists and turns. Is it not true; that, a 40khz sound affects a 10khz sound? So it may be advantageous to make use of this in sound capture and then production. Say with with recording cymbals at a higher hz rate and sampling etc.

Tesla often pinpointed incredibly useful areas of study in the instant an experiment was turned on or off. Something like superluminal theory/effects may still have a productive artistic impact on music production of the near future.

Feedback use was basically non existent in the early era of the music industry... but when focused on, and people started controlling the effect it became an integral part and art from the 60's onward.

I know zero-point theory is a flashpoint for many. (same with quantum thought too I guess) Here is a good basic discussion on stack about electronic circuits I perused https://electronics.stackexchange.c...trons-actually-flow-when-a-voltage-is-applied . Discussions like that one and this one can be eyeopening for some odd reason.

This raises another question - Has anyone done or found a succinct study or article on what happens to an audio signal that passes through a cold wire vs a heated wire? Here is a cool article on the internal life of a vacuum tubes https://audioxpress.com/article/the-internal-life-of-vacuum-tubes

I find all of this very fascinating and learn much from all here on Group Diy daily ty...

 

[ccaudle]

Is it not true; that, a 40khz sound affects a 10khz sound?

Two things have to be true for that statement to be true: the path can transmit 40kHz without high attenuation, and the path must contain a non-linearity which can generate intermodulation products.
In audio electronics both of those are often the case, in acoustics very rarely are either of those conditions present at normal audience distances. At close distances acoustic attenuation is not as high, but air is mostly linear until very high amplitudes.

Something like superluminal theory/effects

That has been very well studied over the last 100 years. The only superluminal behavior ever observed seems to be quantum entanglement, which is not relevant to macroscopic events like sound vibrations. That is not controversial.

I know zero-point theory is a flashpoint for many

I do not understand what you mean by "flashpoint" in this context, but quantum fluctations are relevant at very high energy levels or exceedingly high gravitational gradients. Presumably you are not concerned about playing music or recording audio at a very close distance to the event horizon of a black hole, so again I fail to see why you would bring up something completely irrelevant.

Not every buzzword you come across in a popular science physics text has any relevance to everyday life.