Tubetec said:It seems likely that two different transformer winders might have slightly different approaches ,maybe one will show better on test than the other due to different core materials or winding techniques .
Certainly, but not very much on LF response. Certain winding techniques used for decreasing stray capacitance actually result in increasing the DC resistance of the winding, which could affect le LF response, and particularly LF distortion, in a negative way.ruffrecords said:Winding techniques ... can affect several parameters which have a direct effect on frequency response, balance and output impedance.
abbey road d enfer said:Certainly, but not very much on LF response. Certain winding techniques used for decreasing stray capacitance actually result in increasing the DC resistance of the winding, which could affect le LF response, and particularly LF distortion, in a negative way.
That's exactly what I understood. My comment was more directed to our "ordinary readership".ruffrecords said:Agreed. I was thinking more of HF response, insertion loss and longitudinal balance.
Not really. The magnetic flux (and resultant induction) is directly related to the ratio of Ampere.turns vs. cross section. More turns would result in less max Amps, for an identical net result.There is probably more to be gained by keeping the core cross section the same and changing the lamination so as to increase the bobbin height to allow more turns
That is possible; however the resulting increase of the magnetic core's reluctance would probably increase the leakage inductance.or the same number of turns of thicker wire.
It all starts with u(t)=L.di/dtI am a great believer in nothing is hard to understand once you break it down into a series of smaller understandable chunks.
But more turns means more volts before saturation is reached.abbey road d enfer said:Not really. The magnetic flux (and resultant induction) is directly related to the ratio of Ampere.turns vs. cross section. More turns would result in less max Amps, for an identical net result.
That is true; this would be also the case when just increasing the number of turns on an unchanged core. The inductance would be higher, so the optimum load source would be higher; in short, the output would not be 600r, it would be 1k or whatever. Measurements on 600r load would not be as good, due to resistive and leakage losses. With an elongated core, you could put more copper, which would reduce the resistive losses, but not increase the poweer transfer capability nor the leakage.ruffrecords said:But more turns means more volts before saturation is reached.