My take on the subject of insulation resistance is that the weakest link in the chain is always going to be the limiting factor.
In the case of the Vf14 it used a low loss base material and underwent special testing for suitability in high grid resistance situations such as tube mics . The Ef14,which is a very similar valve wont always perform as well in place of the Vf14,and careful selection will be nesessary to find a usable specimen. Insulation resistance between the pins of the tube being the limiting factor no amount of special precautions/or exotic materials is likely to improve matters a great deal.In models like the Neumann M49 and M50,which used an all glass sub mini wire ended tube ,plexiglass is used to good effect.
I did notice that the original post decrying my work on the B-2 tube mic conversion was edited later, criticisms constructive or deconstructive I have no issue with ,being accused of lying is another matter completely.
Anyway I hope this post finally puts a lid on it ,and hope we can move on to a more constructive approach
In the case of the Vf14 it used a low loss base material and underwent special testing for suitability in high grid resistance situations such as tube mics . The Ef14,which is a very similar valve wont always perform as well in place of the Vf14,and careful selection will be nesessary to find a usable specimen. Insulation resistance between the pins of the tube being the limiting factor no amount of special precautions/or exotic materials is likely to improve matters a great deal.In models like the Neumann M49 and M50,which used an all glass sub mini wire ended tube ,plexiglass is used to good effect.
I did notice that the original post decrying my work on the B-2 tube mic conversion was edited later, criticisms constructive or deconstructive I have no issue with ,being accused of lying is another matter completely.
Anyway I hope this post finally puts a lid on it ,and hope we can move on to a more constructive approach