Ahh yes - maybe following the mains wall outlet convention - stops people licking the exposed pinsDon't forget the temporary decision by German and Austrian engineers to use female sockets for outputs and male for inputs. E.G. the first AKG BX20.
Ahh yes - maybe following the mains wall outlet convention - stops people licking the exposed pinsDon't forget the temporary decision by German and Austrian engineers to use female sockets for outputs and male for inputs. E.G. the first AKG BX20.
That's exactly the justification they had given.Ahh yes - maybe following the mains wall outlet convention - stops people licking the exposed pins
They should put spikes in front of speaker stacks at concerts - stop the headbangers putting their heads into the speakers - like magpie spikes on a bike helmet.Protecting humans from themselves is a full time gig for some safety agencies.
In audio there are considerations about speaker voltage that gets large enough to shock the meat puppets, but music not being continuous (mostly) is not much risk of humans getting stuck to a speaker lines.
JR
Modern solid state power amps are voltage sources that exhibit low output impedance relative to speaker loads, so are effectively bridging outputs (load is nominally 10x source impedance). Vacuum tube power amps exhibit higher output impedance than solid state so use transformers to better match speaker loads to the power tube's source impedance.Only power amps and long line drivers need to be impedance-matched to the load, because you want to make sure that maximum power is transferred to the load, which means maximum voltage AND maximum current.
With input audio devices, however, including outboard line-level gear, you are transferring voltage, not power (look up Ohm's law, voltage dividers). Here, the rule is that the input impedance of the next unit in chain needs to be considerably higher than the generating unit. For example our preamps (Sonic Farm Audio) have a mic input impedance switchable between 1, 2.4 and 10kΩ. There is no perceived level change when switching between them, only with the dynamic mics, whose impedance increases with frequency, there will be a little bit of a high end rolloff at 1k and 2.4k settings, which is the purpose of that switch.
Another example is an audio interface, any brand. As a rule of thumb, the line inputs on those are always solid state, no transformers, and most of them have an input impedance between 5 and 20kΩ. Engineers would go nuts if they had to impedance-match all those line-level units.
Tube stages do have a high output impedance, but the final output of those unit always has a low one, typically below 600Ω. This is achieved either by a step-down transformer or a solid-state buffer. I prefer the second solution, it's more elegant, preserves the tube sound and requires less gain at the tube stage.
One of the most important consideration of mic preamps is noise performance, which has its own impedance matching rules, but this is an issue that designers need to take care of, not the user. Typically, tube and FET stages have a much higher input impedance than transistors, and so mic input transformers in those preamps have a much higher transfer ratio (1:10 or even 1:20). Mic input transformers provide a totally noiseless gain, but they multiply the source (in this case mic) impedance by the square of the transfer ratio, so 100 to 400 times. The "source" impedance seen by the tube/FET will thus be (for a 200Ω mic) 20k or even 80k. Because you can easily achieve a tube/FET stage input impedance of 2.2MΩ or even higher, the signal transfer to the tube will still be optimum. Just don't overdo the transfer ratio, because the input capacitance of the tube/FET stage will start to roll off the high end. There you go, now you can even get into the preamp design.
Power amps and long lines are different animals that require different strategies.Only power amps and long line drivers need to be impedance-matched to the load, because you want to make sure that maximum power is transferred to the load, which means maximum voltage AND maximum current.
That's correct. I remember quite well the amps described in "radio" magazines, that boasted no output xfmr.In the early days of my apprenticeship at Philips there was a lot of gear around that had high impedance speakers - 600Ω - 1KΩ.
I think if they hung on to the speaker cables they’d catch on. I think Rola and Magnavox and Philips all made high impedance speakers. Would’ve been fun to watch the cone of an 8Ω speaker if you plugged it into the extension speaker jack .That's correct. I remember quite well the amps described in "radio" magazines, that boasted no output xfmr.
hey didn't really catch on, though.
back in the 70s I actually made a road trip down to Arlington VA from CT to do a physical patent search to find and look at that Phillips bass feedback patent and others. This was before we could just let our fingers do the walking on the WWW to search patents.In the early days of my apprenticeship at Philips there was a lot of gear around that had high impedance speakers - 600Ω - 1KΩ. These were used in early radiograms and stereograms and there were also 8Ω, 16Ω and 32Ω speakers that had transformers mounted to the basket that ran directly from the tube output stage. Some speaker boxes had transformers in the box - no transformers in the amps.
Philips also developed “motional feedback” speakers in the early ‘70s - they employed a piezo accelerometer mounted on the bass driver dustcap which fed back to the amp to correct LF errors. They were the RH544’s - used on Pink Floyd’s The Wall, The Final Cut, The Division Bell and Roger Waters album Pros &Cons of Hitchhiking.
Yes they do. It doesn't matter in practice, though.Interconnect cables don't have a 'characteristic impedance',
Characteristic impedance is unrelated to frequency.even if they are hundreds of miles long. Cables only approach their advertised 'Radio Frequency Characteristic Impedance' at frequencies above several hundred kilohertz.
Yeah - it’s amazing though, through electronics magazines how quickly word travelled. We were a workshop for Philips warranty and after warranty service and also part of the EDAC and ELA divisions of Philips which involved tech feedback and design testing for tape decks and cassette machines, the first video disc 12” platter machines, Philips proprietary tape noise reduction system DNL (Dynamic Noise Limiter) which they were trying to jam into a car cassette system, Rotor Sound - a solid state stereo Leslie which I think went nowhere, motional feedback speakers and a whole raft of TV innovations. We got a lot of free stuff to “soak test” - run it till it breaks - or not. We got all the latest electronics mags free. Staff price for any components we wanted with no limitations was 20% (1/5) of RRP. We used to get free picture tubes which were rejects if more than 3 phosphors were out (screen fringe only - if centre areas they were rejected with any number). Built my own K9 26” telly in time for the arrival of colour TV first transmission (test) - 1972 Olympics.back in the 70s I actually made a road trip down to Arlington VA from CT to do a physical patent search to find and look at that Phillips bass feedback patent and others. This was before we could just let our fingers do the walking on the WWW to search patents.
JR
Enter your email address to join: