guitarrock04
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 60
I recently picked up a Montgomery Ward Standard Model guitar amp, 25-JDR-2484 at a local guitar show. It is a very neat looking and sounding amp that I picked up for a reasonable price. I've been unable to locate any information specific to this model, but this appears to have been built by Danelectro, and I've found a very similar schetic here:
http://danguitars.com/uploads/dano_special.pdf
Mine is the same, minus the tremolo circuit, and has a tone stack prior to V1, more like this example:
http://www.webphix.com/schematic%20heaven/www.schematicheaven.com/bargainbin/airline_wards_gdr-8513a.pdf
I am overall pleased with the tone of this amp, but would simply like more of it. It stays clean no matter what, I can only just get it to start to break up with a Les Paul and controls dimed.
I have a few questions, to make sure I understand the schematic, and am also open to any opportunities for improvement.
First and foremost, I interpret V2 as a triode-strapped cathodyne phase inverter. Why bother? Is there any technical benefit to this arrangement? Perhaps they found it more economical to use another 6SJ7 since it was already on the shelf?
V1 is grid leak biased, yeah? 15M is a sizeable resistor value! I'm not familiar with this bias strategy, and am trying to wrap my head around how this affects the gain and response of the stage. This arrangement still permits cathode-current feedback, correct? Perhaps I'm better off to update this with typical bypassed cathode bias for higher gain from V1.
V1 screen grid bias is a rather nifty means, pulling voltage from the cathodyne cathode bias resistor. I'm not sure I understand quite how this affects tone, though. Typical screen grid bias is take from the high tension supply through a dropping resistor. Assuming a similar nominal voltage, would the layout here provide a similar response? I'm inclined that the cathodyne bias method here provides some unique means of negative feedback.
Any thoughts, corrections, observations are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
http://danguitars.com/uploads/dano_special.pdf
Mine is the same, minus the tremolo circuit, and has a tone stack prior to V1, more like this example:
http://www.webphix.com/schematic%20heaven/www.schematicheaven.com/bargainbin/airline_wards_gdr-8513a.pdf
I am overall pleased with the tone of this amp, but would simply like more of it. It stays clean no matter what, I can only just get it to start to break up with a Les Paul and controls dimed.
I have a few questions, to make sure I understand the schematic, and am also open to any opportunities for improvement.
First and foremost, I interpret V2 as a triode-strapped cathodyne phase inverter. Why bother? Is there any technical benefit to this arrangement? Perhaps they found it more economical to use another 6SJ7 since it was already on the shelf?
V1 is grid leak biased, yeah? 15M is a sizeable resistor value! I'm not familiar with this bias strategy, and am trying to wrap my head around how this affects the gain and response of the stage. This arrangement still permits cathode-current feedback, correct? Perhaps I'm better off to update this with typical bypassed cathode bias for higher gain from V1.
V1 screen grid bias is a rather nifty means, pulling voltage from the cathodyne cathode bias resistor. I'm not sure I understand quite how this affects tone, though. Typical screen grid bias is take from the high tension supply through a dropping resistor. Assuming a similar nominal voltage, would the layout here provide a similar response? I'm inclined that the cathodyne bias method here provides some unique means of negative feedback.
Any thoughts, corrections, observations are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance