> Less winding capacitance means more leakage inductance and vice versa.
Not really. Inductance goes by number of turns. Capacitance goes by the bulk of the winding.
> a few nF. ...in the range of a few pF. ...a rise at high frequency.....
Vague. How much is "few"? How high is "high"?
Get good numbers. Plot on Reactance Chart. Also plot nominal mike impedance.
The "few nF" job seems to resonate near 200KHz and 300 Ohms. This is a decade above the audio band, and not far off from mike impedance, so I would not expect trouble.
The "few pF" job *appears* to ring at >1MHz(!) and 25K. I feel sure this is a measurement error. C is more likely "few hundred pFd". This plots 200KHz and 2.5K, higher than mike, so not well damped.
Not really. Inductance goes by number of turns. Capacitance goes by the bulk of the winding.
> a few nF. ...in the range of a few pF. ...a rise at high frequency.....
Vague. How much is "few"? How high is "high"?
Get good numbers. Plot on Reactance Chart. Also plot nominal mike impedance.
The "few nF" job seems to resonate near 200KHz and 300 Ohms. This is a decade above the audio band, and not far off from mike impedance, so I would not expect trouble.
The "few pF" job *appears* to ring at >1MHz(!) and 25K. I feel sure this is a measurement error. C is more likely "few hundred pFd". This plots 200KHz and 2.5K, higher than mike, so not well damped.