Motown Direct Amplifier-inspired Preamp?
- Thread starter untune
- Start date
Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:
Dave there us a 68K on both grids of the 6N1P and a 15K on the 6BX7 and a 20 pf dogbone cap on the f/b resistor but a ceramic would work just as well.
A Jensen 4:1 output would probably sound awesome in this circuit.
A Jensen 4:1 output would probably sound awesome in this circuit.
Last edited:
This is the schematic as it stands today:-
The 6N1P was a Russian tube introduced in 1954, I'm not sure if it was imported into the US before the Motown amp was made.
The ECC88/6DJ8 was introduced into the US in 1957. We cannot be sure if we have duplicated the original circuit but it looks like we have matched the spec. Thanks CJ.
best
DaveP
The 6N1P was a Russian tube introduced in 1954, I'm not sure if it was imported into the US before the Motown amp was made.
The ECC88/6DJ8 was introduced into the US in 1957. We cannot be sure if we have duplicated the original circuit but it looks like we have matched the spec. Thanks CJ.
best
DaveP
Attachments
Last edited:
capacitorless
Well-known member
Not to derail, but I'm just (thanks, Dave & CJ!) finding out about the 6N1P, as a possible replacement for the ecc88 type. Is this a superior device in this particular circuit?
I know there's more filament draw, just wondered about the other parameters.
I know there's more filament draw, just wondered about the other parameters.
Do nickel core outputs sound better to you in general, despite higher price for Ni, or just in particular applications like this mic amp/DI where majority would go for steel core? I like them a lot, despite slightly higher distortion if Ni core isn't quite a bit bigger than the same steel core.
If Davep, Ian, you and others think it is appropriate, we could have OEP also make some typical tube output ratios. One OT the offered to me as a sample had 80Ni core with 2:1 ratio, i will certainly call them soon and post the test (electronic and listening).
Strange, schematic only opens if i quote that post.This is the schematic as it stands today:-
The 6N1P was a Russian tube introduced in 1954, I'm not sure if it was imported into the US before the Motown amp was made.
The ECC88/6DJ8 was introduced into the US in 1957. We cannot be sure if we have duplicated the original circuit but it looks like we have matched the spec. Thanks CJ.
best
DaveP
Disco Volante
Well-known member
Works fine here. Great work!
Good question, what looks like typical Soviet datasheets with Cyrillic on the left and Latin on the right are not dated, Svetlana datasheet came later. Search of US made gear with 6N1P doesn't show much gear older than ~24 years, same is with gear from Western and Central Europe, at least i could not find anything much older, or remember older schematics by known Western companies. EI Nis from Yugoslavia didn't make this model, i'm pretty sure Yugoslav army didn't use it either, despite importing lots of Western tubes like Siemens, RCA, Telefunken, etc.
I will check the other place with more members from ex Soviet countries and post here.
you can support either Ukraine or Russia, depending on who you buy from.
the 6N1P was a leftover from a Reddi DI build.
We don't have the Motown schematic and don't want to upset ACME by reversing their box, which isn't the same anyway (6V6 instead of a 6BX7), so this is just an effort to make a nice sounding Guitar/Bass DI with hopefully the same output tube as the original. It is not an overdrive or chorus or delay pedal, so no drastic change to the tone of the instrument will occur. However, it does provide a nice tone that will transmit over a long cable to a mixing board, so good for the studio or a live situation. The difference between plugging straight into the board or using the DI can be heard quite well, at least on my cheap Yamaha mixer.
And i do not think it will make you into Joe Messina, Chank , Robert White or James Jamerson, but it might get you closer to maybe laying down some tracks in the Motown vein than say putting a 57 on a Twin Reverb,
It's nice that Dave's circuit has that high end response as it will maybe help things stand out in the mix, or compensate for a lo-fi reel to reel machine. Who knows what the engineers did to the signal after it went into the control room, that is another part of the equation for sure.
the 6N1P was a leftover from a Reddi DI build.
We don't have the Motown schematic and don't want to upset ACME by reversing their box, which isn't the same anyway (6V6 instead of a 6BX7), so this is just an effort to make a nice sounding Guitar/Bass DI with hopefully the same output tube as the original. It is not an overdrive or chorus or delay pedal, so no drastic change to the tone of the instrument will occur. However, it does provide a nice tone that will transmit over a long cable to a mixing board, so good for the studio or a live situation. The difference between plugging straight into the board or using the DI can be heard quite well, at least on my cheap Yamaha mixer.
And i do not think it will make you into Joe Messina, Chank , Robert White or James Jamerson, but it might get you closer to maybe laying down some tracks in the Motown vein than say putting a 57 on a Twin Reverb,
It's nice that Dave's circuit has that high end response as it will maybe help things stand out in the mix, or compensate for a lo-fi reel to reel machine. Who knows what the engineers did to the signal after it went into the control room, that is another part of the equation for sure.
Last edited:
Dave one thing you might add to the schemo is another 1/4" out so that the musician can use his amp and the DI at the same time.
ruffrecords
Well-known member
While we are looking at alternative output tubes, the Pultech MB-1 mic pre, which must be of a similar era to the Motown, used a 12AU7 cathode follower with the two triodes in parallel.
Cheers
Ian
Cheers
Ian
And the Pultec MEQ-5 amp circuit is nearly identical to the MB-1 but uses 6AQ5 which is similar to 6V6
Wavelength
Well-known member
Just my 2 pennies...
I am pretty sure even though the data sheet for the 6N1P says 1M grid resistance max that several people over on DIYAUDIO saw some grid current when used that high. That coupled with the 68K grid stop (which seems a little excessive) might cause grid current which will lead to microphonics.
In general 6DJ8 is an ok tube by any means, 6922 and some of the EURO ECC88 are much better. Sonically the 6N1P is a bit sterile in the circuits I built.
That output is crazy, parallel 6BX7 (I have a bunch) could drive probably close to a watt of power.
I am pretty sure even though the data sheet for the 6N1P says 1M grid resistance max that several people over on DIYAUDIO saw some grid current when used that high. That coupled with the 68K grid stop (which seems a little excessive) might cause grid current which will lead to microphonics.
In general 6DJ8 is an ok tube by any means, 6922 and some of the EURO ECC88 are much better. Sonically the 6N1P is a bit sterile in the circuits I built.
That output is crazy, parallel 6BX7 (I have a bunch) could drive probably close to a watt of power.
