ruffrecords
Well-known member
I think I may have found a possible solution to this problem. Here is a link to the type I originally used:
http://uk.farnell.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&langId=44&urlRequestType=Base&partNumber=1749245&storeId=10151
These are Panasonic ELC-18B series. Looking at the datasheet fro the ELC series I see there is an E version which looks like this:
http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/elc18e682l/inductor-6800uh-0-39a-10-radial/dp/2423581?categoryId=700000005459
Would I be right in thinking that this form of enclosed construction would have far less of an extraneous field and hence far less mutual inductance, perhaps even to the point where its effect is second order?
Cheers
Ian
http://uk.farnell.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&langId=44&urlRequestType=Base&partNumber=1749245&storeId=10151
These are Panasonic ELC-18B series. Looking at the datasheet fro the ELC series I see there is an E version which looks like this:
http://uk.farnell.com/panasonic-electronic-components/elc18e682l/inductor-6800uh-0-39a-10-radial/dp/2423581?categoryId=700000005459
Would I be right in thinking that this form of enclosed construction would have far less of an extraneous field and hence far less mutual inductance, perhaps even to the point where its effect is second order?
Cheers
Ian