This isn't about Title 2, it's about the 2010 Open Internet Order (FCC 10-201 and FCC-15-24A1):pucho812 said:Nothing in title II prevents the internet providers from doing tier pricing which appears to be the main argument for net neutrality.
No Paid Prioritization.
Paid prioritization occurs when a broadband provider accepts payment (monetary or otherwise) to manage its network in a way that benefits particular content, applications, services, or devices. To protect against “fast lanes,” this Order adopts a rule that establishes that:
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization.
“Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity.
I'm not understanding....FCC 15-24 was adopted in Feb of 2015, a year after that court case was decided. The language between FCC 15-24 and the prior 2010 OIS language was largely the same.pucho812 said:
Enter your email address to join: