Hello people,
I am making some plans for a simple mixer to accommodate an easy listening setup for 2 record players.
With this setup I want to be able to play one after the other record without the 'silence' of switching records (taking the needle off etc.) to
keep the listening sessions more fluid and uninterrupted. While I'm at it, I'd add a mono/stereo switch for the moments I'd play a mono record
(for people who are wondering, mono records sound better in mono).
This mini-mixer will consist of 2 volume pots (one for the left record player, one for the right), a mono/stereo switch and a direct source connection
for a 3rd record player. This will be fed into the phono stage I have on my amplifier.
I would like to keep the signal as clean as possible, not running it through big capacitors, opamps etc. If that's possible is of course the question I'll hope
to find out with this.
Possible issue 1:
Since I have a good tubed phono stage, I'd like to keep this mixer as passive as possible. I'm not sure if a small signal which an element picks
up lets itself be passively attenuated. I have seen phonostages with a 100k Log input so I can't figure out why it shouldn't, but still I'd like it confirmed.
Then, what would be a good potentiometer value? 25K, 50K 100K?
The element I have is an MM Goldring Elektra (load resistance 47k, load capacitance 150-400pF so I guess I have to get a 50K pot for it?).
Possible issue 2:
The merging of signals. which I made grey on the schematic since I am not sure if I'm able to just connect the signals and be done with this.
I have seen a tubecad issue on mixers that separatesthe channels using a tube. The Tube CAD Journal: Vacuum tube mixers
I am just wondering, is this necessary, can I go without? What would be the consequences of either choice?
If there would be just very little crosstalk, I could make a 'signal lift' before the volume pot to completely silence the other channel?
I'm curious to see reactions on this, thank you very much!
I am making some plans for a simple mixer to accommodate an easy listening setup for 2 record players.
With this setup I want to be able to play one after the other record without the 'silence' of switching records (taking the needle off etc.) to
keep the listening sessions more fluid and uninterrupted. While I'm at it, I'd add a mono/stereo switch for the moments I'd play a mono record
(for people who are wondering, mono records sound better in mono).
This mini-mixer will consist of 2 volume pots (one for the left record player, one for the right), a mono/stereo switch and a direct source connection
for a 3rd record player. This will be fed into the phono stage I have on my amplifier.
I would like to keep the signal as clean as possible, not running it through big capacitors, opamps etc. If that's possible is of course the question I'll hope
to find out with this.
Possible issue 1:
Since I have a good tubed phono stage, I'd like to keep this mixer as passive as possible. I'm not sure if a small signal which an element picks
up lets itself be passively attenuated. I have seen phonostages with a 100k Log input so I can't figure out why it shouldn't, but still I'd like it confirmed.
Then, what would be a good potentiometer value? 25K, 50K 100K?
The element I have is an MM Goldring Elektra (load resistance 47k, load capacitance 150-400pF so I guess I have to get a 50K pot for it?).
Possible issue 2:
The merging of signals. which I made grey on the schematic since I am not sure if I'm able to just connect the signals and be done with this.
I have seen a tubecad issue on mixers that separatesthe channels using a tube. The Tube CAD Journal: Vacuum tube mixers
I am just wondering, is this necessary, can I go without? What would be the consequences of either choice?
If there would be just very little crosstalk, I could make a 'signal lift' before the volume pot to completely silence the other channel?
I'm curious to see reactions on this, thank you very much!