In the grand scheme of things UL is not a prohibitive cost factor for "real" businesses developing new products. Tooling up a slick package could cost a few times that, not to mention marketing a different new product.boji said:Can't ignore the irony of UL making it cost prohibitive to approve devices that fix known safety issues.
UL is the stopper for me because the odds of "me" getting my investment back are about zero, and I've been unsuccessful finding a deep pockets partner.
==========
In hindsight if that neon lamp screwdriver probe is UL approved, that tells me the simple 3 lamp outlet tester that doesn't work properly could be converted into a 4 lamp outlet tester that does reveal hot safety ground for a very manageable BOM cost increase (one more neon lamp, one more resistor, and one touch contact.) I still predict a couple $10K worth of jawboning to get UL to change their written standard, since that screwdriver clearly does not provide 100M of insulation resistance, more like 100K ohm.
A 4 lamp outlet tester in the same < $10 retail would be a winner and perhaps save lives. I need to run this up the right flagpole, and see if anybody salutes. Unfortunately these days that flagpole is probably in China.
That dangerous old 3 lamp tester is still an embarrassment to knowledgable electricians and a hazard to everybody else. The good news is that as time goes on there are less and less conversion of 2 wire houses to 3 wire outlets, but it is still not zero.
JR