Yes, the hole pattern is specific to the k47 capsuleView attachment 131589View attachment 131590
Have I found something actually close to K47 capsule?
It was also cheap enough to be counted as RK87 tier
Yes, but the Chinese k47 capsules have a boost in the medium/mid-high area more pronounced than a correct K47, by a few dB.It sounds more nasal, shrill.Single-diaphragm K47-type, for your U47fet
@kingkorg spent money, time, put a lot of work into measuring many types of capsules, including cheap ones.
IIRC, if needed for experiments something cheap, (which has more pronounced mids, but still has the character of k47) he recommended
https://a.aliexpress.com/_ExgrqtV
These chinese k47, even though not accurate, because they use the correct acoustic principle, and construction, are still in the same family, and will give that sound. Excess boost can be corrected with an EQ. It's not like you're trying to EQ k67 to sound like a k47.I ordered two of those to try out, just this morning.
I don’t think anybody really expects the Chinese stuff to sound exactly like the original, but a Chinese K47 is still closer to a real K47 - which are all over the place, in any case - than a Chinese K67 is.
The single-diaphragm versions *might* be looser in QC than the double-sided ones, since matching is of some consequence.
As you say, @kingkorg took the time to compare the various iterations. There is a considerable benefit in taking advantage of such efforts, so generously shared.
It's not that i recommended those capsules, it's just that i can't find anything particularly wrong with them besides that boost. As i can measure them, it's easy to correct for that error. Some had issues with these, like particles stuck underneath, and collapsed, damaged diaphragms.
I find this K47 (and CK12 types for that matter) capsules are absolutely better made than the RK87 capsules. Better consistency for sure, I had one RK87 although cheaper arrived with overtorqued diaphragm on one side which I managed to fix by slightly loosening one screwHow close the actual frequency response is (or isn't) to the original though, is a whole different thing...
Enter your email address to join: