[SOLVED]Motor transistors keep dying on me

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I serviced an 80-8 years ago with a similar issue and it turned out to be a regulator, but I don't recall where in the circuit.
I maintain one of those machines for a local studio...next time I'm there I'll take a look at the manual and if I have time measure some values at the motors.
 
@inkster thanks a lot! That would be very helpful. This is the single most confusing issue I've met, and I have worked on both my machines extensively.
 
There are no regulators directly affecting the motor though, as they are supplied AC directly from the transformer. And my measurements show the correct DC voltages on the reel control card
 
I think I will do that then. It's not like I'm losing anything by putting new ones in even if it turns out something else was the culprit.
 
Yes, C111 or C112 (as they're just connected point to point under the chassis it's difficult to say which one of those two exactly), so I changed both of them for two that can handle s little higher voltage
Have you replaced CR1 and CR2? As I mentioned before these are capacitor resistor networks (0.01uF + 120R) and will probably look like this type.

1731626523627.png
I replaced a lot of these in photo-flash units (from early '80s) for a friend of mine who was a photographer. If there is space replace them with much higher voltage rating.
 
Last edited:
There is still no explanation for you getting a reading of 300V. This should be impossible. The motors should have separate supply windings on the transformer. Have you checked between those windings for leakage?
 
I have explained that. It is due to the capacitors being charged through two separate windings on t=0 and summing. They then discharge and settle at 150V. See below

1731630819502.png
 
Have you replaced CR1 and CR2? As I mentioned before these are capacitor resistor networks (0.01uF + 120R) and will probably look like this type.

View attachment 139989
I replaced a lot of these in photo-flash units (from early '80s) for a friend of mine who was a photographer. If there is space replace them with much higher voltage rating.

If those are the same construction as their (Rifa's) metallized paper X2 mains capacitors, those are ticking time-bomb and they WILL (destructively) fail 😬

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=04e68c913ef2a454&q=rifa+fail&udm=2
 
@sahib no I haven't changed them. They haven't exploded but may be a good idea to replaced just in case.

@tk@halmi yes I'm thinking of changing motor caps. A little difficult to find perfect replacements, but maybe it's ok to change them with caps that are slightly different value? Like a 1uF off
 
If those are the same construction as their (Rifa's) metallized paper X2 mains capacitors, those are ticking time-bomb and they WILL (destructively) fail 😬

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=04e68c913ef2a454&q=rifa+fail&udm=2
Indeed. And with a mighty bang. Here is the proof.

1731658425138.jpeg



What is interesting is that the CR components are 0,1 uF and not 0,01 like in the schemos
That is not a problem. 0.1uF is fine. But I strongly recommend that you replace them all because of their age now. And again use much higher voltage rating.
 
Semiconductors generally fail from overheating or over-voltage. 5W emitter resistors suggest some power in the area. If not overheated (literally melting the silicon) voltage spikes could punch shorts between collector emitter. Can I ASSume the bad transistors measure shorted collector-emitter? Less common failure modes are open bases (from excessive base current). Back in the 60s as a junior technician I would grind the tops off metal can transistors to look for voltage spike punch throughs (visible as a dot where the collector-emitter is shorted, with some local melting around the dot from the heat caused by that short. )

I see a RC spike snubber, and a CR snubber (?), across the transistors. Dried out caps in the snubber circuit could diminish effectiveness. I am not even sure what a CR component is maybe some kind of capacitor?

Good luck

JR
It is possible to clip the base tension with some diodes in series and the collector tension with voltage dependent resistors.
 
So today I put new transistors in there. I first mounted one and tried running the motor for quite some time -- success. But after mounting the second transistor and running the motors again, they both failed. I checked so that there were no shorts from case to chassis before. This just makes me go insane. It's such a simple fault but I just. can't. find. the issue. I just want to get this over with and have my machine up and running again. Any further advice is very welcomed. Willing to try anything at this point.

Edit: I also replaced the spark killers CR1 and 2
 
Would I be correct in assuming that you replaced Q102 first and the supply motor run fine.

But when you fitted Q103 both transistors failed.

If so, this time do the reverse.

Fit Q103 and run the take-up motor to see if that is going to run ok by itself.

If it does then fit Q102 to see if both transistors fail again.

Also don't have tape on the machine.
 
@sahib I tried your advice, and weirdly enough the transistors are now intact. Sadly take up won't move and I've narrowed it down to something being off in the logic, as the driving transistors don't get the proper voltage. It's around 1.2v in ffwd and judging by the voltage coming to the base of the supply power transistor in rwd, it should be around 10-11v. Oy vey, this is a never ending journey. But at least the transistors don't blow anymore. Next thing is trouble shooting the logic... It's a bit difficult to get to the various measuring points
 
Back
Top