PRR said:
> thing about air conditioning is that it dehumidifies the indoor air at the same time as cooling it,
I'm running the A/C more to knock-down the damp than for cooling.
I designed it "small" so-that it would run long enough to de-damp.
Still it can be "cold" before it gets dry. Industrially we would re-heat cold dry air. I'm now realizing that >half the "warm enough?" days on the Maine coast, what I really want is a dehumidifier-- knocks down the water without cooling. Then run the A/C for the final bit of comfort.
(I have a dehumidifier-- down cellar. It runs half of May-October to control the mold.)
I actually have two dehumidifiers that I run 24x7 (one day time, the other for night time) to keep indoor black mold in check (mold can't live with humidity below 40-50%). These dehumidifiers can add significant heat, no problem in the winter, but not very desirable in the summer (in MS).
My smart air conditioner "economy" settings shuts down at night when outdoor temps are falling, so my nighttime dehumidifier easily grabs a gallon of water over night while heating up the casa. In the day time hours my air co basically grabs all the free water so my day time dehumidifier just coasts not collecting enough water to empty.
The A/C compressor came with dire warnings not to install it indoors. Duh? Well actually I suspect I "could" have let it blow the heat in the cellar. At summer-start it is below 60F down there. I suspect a heavy summer worth of A/C heat-dump could approach 80F (limited by vast conduction to 56F ground). The A/C would "short" through the floor but that's pretty stout thermally. And it would take the dip out of the following winter's cellar cold, maybe. (If the ground stayed still, it would hold heat. I do suspect considerable groundwater seepage under/past the cellar floor.)
Just do it.... If it sounds smart it probably is. You are smarter than the average bear.
[edit] maybe... if there is adequate air turnover to move the heat required. [/edit]
I have recently started setting my air conditioner thermostat lower in the day time to get more water extraction from the air conditioner than the dehumidifier (with it's inadvertent heat) which I can during summer months. Since doing that my daytime dehumidifier doesn't get squat moisture. My next experiment is to defeat the energy saving feature on the air conditioner, so it will run more overnight and pull water then so the night time dehumidifier can work less, introducing less heat indoors.
[edit] OK the experimental results came in almost immediately... I could literally see the humidity increase on my temp/humidity monitor, as the fan kept running after the compressor cycled off. In hindsight, the air moving across the damp compressor coils just evaporated that moisture back into the room air. So back to energy saver mode. :-[ I wish I could defeat the hysteresis and paying attention to outdoor temperature direction of change, but that's life. [/edit]
The summer economics of energy saving may suggest my not using the smart thermostat at all, and just let the air conditioner manage simple indoor temperature. Winter is different with both dehumidifiers pulling water that the air conditioner doesn't get when not running.
JR
PS: My third dehumidifier, a slick Peltier based unit that was supposed to be quiet had a fan so A) it wasn't quiet, B) broke several times (fan once and PS twice) and C) when working didn't grab much moisture... I already don't miss it. Sad when a clever design concept fails to deliver. I am sucker for high technology, but it should at least work better than low tech.