bluebird
Well-known member
pucho812 said:We have ap script for matching them
Audio design would be so much easier if we just had one ear on our forehead. One speaker, no matching, no panning circuits...
pucho812 said:We have ap script for matching them
But if we didn't have two ears, our distant ancestors would have been eaten by saber tooth tigers when they couldn't determine what direction the animal noises were coming from.bluebird said:Audio design would be so much easier if we just had one ear on our forehead. One speaker, no matching, no panning circuits...
JohnRoberts said:But if we didn't have two ears, our distant ancestors would have been eaten by saber tooth tigers when they couldn't determine what direction the animal noises were coming from.
JR
It is a little crazy to argue about hypotheticals, and I am pretty sure the single ear in the middle of this imaginary forehead, could discriminate front/back from frequency shading traveling around the head, but I wouldn't speculate further about pinnae transforms without knowing the shape of the hypothetical single front facing ear. (We'd have to redesign all the surround sound effects. : )ruffrecords said:Maybe not. My prof did some research on how ears discriminate front/back and up down as part of a project to help blind people see with ultrasound. He discovered the reflection from the shoulders are crucial in determining up/down and the shape of the ear and the differences in delays for sound from the front and the back are necessary fro front back discrimination. So I single ear can tell front/back and up down. Two also gives you left/right. So two cooperative one eared humans standing back to back would have been able to detect a sabre toothed tiger from any direction.
Cheers
Ian
Enter your email address to join: