I recommend that you connect AGND and DGND together directly at the ADC. Treat
this node as an analog return path and route it separately over a wide ground
plane back to the power supply. Do the same for any other ADCs you have in the
system, connect AGND and DGND together directly at the IC and route it
separately back to the power supply. This will mean that you have separate
ground return paths for each ADC.
Back in the early days of machine insertion for PCBs, they actually used zero ohm resistors in place of jumpers.Sometimes they will also be labelled as a resistor and then a 0 ohm resistor is installed
you can buy smd inductors. When I put a class D amp IC in my drum tuner I put inductors in series with the output in combination with Cs to gnd.i never used a bead, although i have seen them in circuits.
any recommended brand? for SMD.
They (analog and digital gnd pins on the converter IC) generally need to be connected with a low impedance. Putting a ferrite bead in between is probably a bad idea in general. The vendor datasheet or app note is usually a good starting point, but don't assume the app note schematic is the optimum that can be achieved. You would be much better off keeping the return impedance as low as possible, meaning full board ground plane with direct connections from pins to plane, and segregate analog and digital return currents by spacing on the PCB rather than separating the copper. High frequency return currents will follow the path of least inductance, so you can control where the currents flow in the ground plane by how you route the signal and power.they ultimately need to get connected to work.
The ferrite bead produces a high impedance at high frequencies, so for audio frequencies its basically a short but keeps those dirty digital edges out of the analog ground. I reckon its not the most elegant solution.... But in this case, (looks like that chip is an ADC), analog and digital grounds might be best left connected like you mention, I am thinking more of a micro controller or something like that.They (analog and digital gnd pins on the converter IC) generally need to be connected with a low impedance. Putting a ferrite bead in between is probably a bad idea in general. The vendor datasheet or app note is usually a good starting point, but don't assume the app note schematic is the optimum that can be achieved. You would be much better off keeping the return impedance as low as possible, meaning full board ground plane with direct connections from pins to plane, and segregate analog and digital return currents by spacing on the PCB rather than separating the copper. High frequency return currents will follow the path of least inductance, so you can control where the currents flow in the ground plane by how you route the signal and power.
The problem with zero ohm resistors is that there is no such thing as a zero ohm resistor, specially at high frequencies. Or better put, a zero ohm resistor is not a zero ohm impedance.
some answers from stack exchange:
View attachment 93899
http://www.analog.com/en/content/raq_groundingadcs/fca.html
than i found what
https://ez.analog.com/data_converters/high-speed_adcs/w/documents/2665/ad9243-grounding
It goes beyond having zero resistance, they have parasitic inductance and capacitance, at high frequencies they present a high impedance, that was my point, not the fact that you need a super conductor.True but so what ? No conductor eg pcb track is 'Zero Ohm'
Well - I've (obviously not) tried using a 1206 superconductor. But found it hard to solder
It goes beyond having zero resistance, they have parasitic inductance and capacitance, at high frequencies they present a high impedance, that was my point, not the fact that you need a super conductor.
I know one or two professional PCB designers that would disagree with you on the severity of this issue, and Im not talking about stuff in the GHz range, these resistors can also wreck havoc when it comes to EMI, zero ohm resistors should be avoided in digital circuits with fast rise/fall times, period, clock speed is not the biggest issue, but fast transition times.Obviously I was joking about the superconductor. The parasitic capacitance from end to end is essentially bypassed by the (very very near) zero ohm resistance. There is series inductance but with a metal film type it is very small - down in the nH range. I don't think anyone is using wirewounds for zero ohm links.
Sadly after he died, his web-page disappeared. I used the Internet Archive to store most of the interesting pages on my hard drive.Henry Ott (RIP - he died last year) used to have some very good stuff on this on the web but I don't think it's available now ?
When I designed RF amps a mere 0.5 mm of extra conductor length would alter the entire circuit dramatically, accurate models of passive components need to be used for simulation, you can't assume a linear and lumped parameter model for the passive components
Enter your email address to join: