Indeed, I've been saying so for quite awhile and keep reinforcing this idea every time. My preference for the true SDC pressure omni and fig8 ribbons because those are native patterns and as such, they are much more natural sounding due to the way of forming their flat response.
That is, the fig8 is a mass controlled system with diaphragm tuned to the lowest frequency, so when going up the response naturally drops 6dB per octave. However, the forces on diaphragm get increased with the same rate each octave up--that's how we get linear response. Those times when the ribbons had limited response on top of bandwidth are long gone and modern ribbons can by far surpass fig8 dual diaphragm condenser mics response on top end (not to mention all deficiencies of low end response of the fig8 condensers). This is not to mention that ribbon because of its narrow size has BY FAR superior polar response than any condenser could possibly dream.
On the contrary, the pressure omni is a stiffness controlled system tuned to the top of the bandwidth, so its frequency response gets formed in the same manner, just opposite direction and the polar resonse is defined only by physical size of the diaphragm.
With the cardioid LDC the things are much more complicated. Since they are tuned into the midband (usually around 1000Hz) above that frequency they are mass and below are stiffness controlled. This by itself creates a huge (up to 60dB) peak, which needs to be flattened with what's called "acoustical resistance". This resistance is what responsible for more strained, compressed, and less natural sonics. Also, double diaphragm designs introduce additional challenges and problems, so in general, it is much easier to optimize and fine tune a single diaphragm capsule (also called 'vented') for frequency, phase, and polar responses.
Best, M